Aileen P Wright, Allison B McCoy, Kimberly Garcia, Peter J Embí, Walter K Clair, MacRae F Linton, Adam T Wright
{"title":"Impact of PREVENT Cardiovascular Risk Equations on Statin Eligibility by Subgroup and Risk Thresholds: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Aileen P Wright, Allison B McCoy, Kimberly Garcia, Peter J Embí, Walter K Clair, MacRae F Linton, Adam T Wright","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09858-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Replacing the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) with the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs (PREVENT) equations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is projected to reduce statin eligibility, prompting discussion of lowering the risk threshold used with PREVENT. The potential impact on statin eligibility in different subgroups is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of replacing PCEs with PREVENT equations on statin eligibility for a real-world population of primary care patients, incorporating social deprivation index (SDI) and lowering the ASCVD risk thresholds for statin eligibility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis comparing 10-year ASCVD risk scores and statin eligibility using the PCEs and PREVENT equations within a primary care population. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex, and race. Risk thresholds for statin eligibility were varied to assess the effect on eligibility.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients who visited a Vanderbilt primary care clinic in 2023.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Estimated 10-year ASCVD risk and proportion of patients eligible for statin therapy using the PCEs vs. PREVENT equations.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>In 50,123 patients, the mean 10-year ASCVD risk was significantly lower with PREVENT compared to the PCEs (3.6 vs. 7.5, p < 0.0001). In 36,430 patients not on statins, PREVENT reduced statin eligibility by 78.2%, with the largest reductions in women (82.6%), patients aged 40-49 (97.8%), and Black patients (81.2%). Lowering the statin eligibility threshold from 7.5 to 3% led to a 27.5% overall increase in eligibility rather than 78.2% reduction. However, gaps between subgroups expanded, and younger and Black patients retained relative reductions in eligibility (e.g., 4.7% decrease in statin eligibility among Black patients compared to a 32.7% increase among White patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world primary care population, replacing the PCEs with the PREVENT equations would significantly reduce statin eligibility at the 7.5% threshold. Lowering the risk threshold would increase overall eligibility but disproportionately affect eligibility within certain subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09858-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Replacing the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) with the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs (PREVENT) equations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is projected to reduce statin eligibility, prompting discussion of lowering the risk threshold used with PREVENT. The potential impact on statin eligibility in different subgroups is unknown.
Objective: To assess the impact of replacing PCEs with PREVENT equations on statin eligibility for a real-world population of primary care patients, incorporating social deprivation index (SDI) and lowering the ASCVD risk thresholds for statin eligibility.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis comparing 10-year ASCVD risk scores and statin eligibility using the PCEs and PREVENT equations within a primary care population. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex, and race. Risk thresholds for statin eligibility were varied to assess the effect on eligibility.
Participants: Adult patients who visited a Vanderbilt primary care clinic in 2023.
Main measures: Estimated 10-year ASCVD risk and proportion of patients eligible for statin therapy using the PCEs vs. PREVENT equations.
Key results: In 50,123 patients, the mean 10-year ASCVD risk was significantly lower with PREVENT compared to the PCEs (3.6 vs. 7.5, p < 0.0001). In 36,430 patients not on statins, PREVENT reduced statin eligibility by 78.2%, with the largest reductions in women (82.6%), patients aged 40-49 (97.8%), and Black patients (81.2%). Lowering the statin eligibility threshold from 7.5 to 3% led to a 27.5% overall increase in eligibility rather than 78.2% reduction. However, gaps between subgroups expanded, and younger and Black patients retained relative reductions in eligibility (e.g., 4.7% decrease in statin eligibility among Black patients compared to a 32.7% increase among White patients).
Conclusions: In a real-world primary care population, replacing the PCEs with the PREVENT equations would significantly reduce statin eligibility at the 7.5% threshold. Lowering the risk threshold would increase overall eligibility but disproportionately affect eligibility within certain subgroups.
背景:预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的合并队列方程(pce)被替换为心血管疾病事件预测风险(prevention)方程,预计会降低他汀类药物的使用资格,从而引发降低使用prevention的风险阈值的讨论。不同亚组对他汀类药物适格性的潜在影响尚不清楚。目的:通过纳入社会剥夺指数(SDI)和降低他汀类药物适格性的ASCVD风险阈值,评估用PREVENT方程替代pce对现实世界初级保健患者他汀类药物适格性的影响。设计:横断面分析,比较初级保健人群中10年ASCVD风险评分和他汀类药物适格性,使用pce和PREVENT方程。按年龄、性别和种族进行亚组分析。改变他汀类药物适格性的风险阈值以评估其对适格性的影响。参与者:2023年到范德比尔特初级保健诊所就诊的成年患者。主要测量方法:使用PCEs和PREVENT方程估计10年ASCVD风险和适合他汀类药物治疗的患者比例。关键结果:在50123例患者中,与pce相比,使用prevention的平均10年ASCVD风险显著降低(3.6 vs. 7.5, p)。结论:在现实世界的初级保健人群中,用prevention公式代替pce将显著降低他汀类药物在7.5%阈值下的适格性。降低风险阈值将增加总体资格,但对某些亚组的资格影响不成比例。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.