Liu Ziqing, Cao He, Li Zhangjie, Yu Qiangqiang, Sang Lan, Duan Chaoyang
{"title":"Effects of cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy : A randomized controlled pilot trial.","authors":"Liu Ziqing, Cao He, Li Zhangjie, Yu Qiangqiang, Sang Lan, Duan Chaoyang","doi":"10.1177/10538127251381073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251381073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251381073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.