Anti-TNF Therapies Promote a Proximal-to-Distal Healing Pattern in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Emily C L Wong, Parambir S Dulai, John K Marshall, Vipul Jairath, Walter Reinisch, Neeraj Narula
{"title":"Anti-TNF Therapies Promote a Proximal-to-Distal Healing Pattern in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.","authors":"Emily C L Wong, Parambir S Dulai, John K Marshall, Vipul Jairath, Walter Reinisch, Neeraj Narula","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colonic mucosa, extending proximally from the rectum. However, the segmental pattern of healing in UC remains unclear. Endoscopic improvement (EI), a key therapeutic endpoint, is typically assessed using the Mayo endoscopic score (MES), which scores the worst affected area and may miss partial/segmental healing. This study evaluates healing patterns in UC and compares conventional MES with a 3-segment MES approach for detecting treatment effects in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post hoc analysis of HIBISCUS I/II and GARDENIA trials was conducted in UC patients with moderate-to-severe disease (MES >2 up to the descending colon). The primary outcome was the proportion of anti-tumor necrosis factor-treated participants achieving MES ≤1 in the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum at week 10. Secondary outcomes included conventionally measured EI, segmental MES improvements, clinical response, and Patient-Reported Outcome 2 (PRO2) normalization. Outcomes were compared between adalimumab, infliximab, and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 300 participants, 217 received infliximab or adalimumab, while 83 received placebo. Healing followed a proximal-to-distal pattern, with the highest EI in the descending colon and the lowest in the rectum. Infliximab-treated patients continued this trend at week 54. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy significantly improved EI vs placebo (42.9% vs 19.3%; P < .001). No segmental MES approach outperformed conventional MES for detecting treatment effects. Combined endpoints (MES ≤1 + PRO2 normalization) better captured therapeutic benefits than PRO2 alone (28.6% vs 13.3%; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UC healing follows a proximal-to-distal pattern. Conventional MES remains superior for detecting treatment effects over segmental MES. Further studies should explore alternative endoscopic scoring methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colonic mucosa, extending proximally from the rectum. However, the segmental pattern of healing in UC remains unclear. Endoscopic improvement (EI), a key therapeutic endpoint, is typically assessed using the Mayo endoscopic score (MES), which scores the worst affected area and may miss partial/segmental healing. This study evaluates healing patterns in UC and compares conventional MES with a 3-segment MES approach for detecting treatment effects in clinical trials.

Methods: A post hoc analysis of HIBISCUS I/II and GARDENIA trials was conducted in UC patients with moderate-to-severe disease (MES >2 up to the descending colon). The primary outcome was the proportion of anti-tumor necrosis factor-treated participants achieving MES ≤1 in the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum at week 10. Secondary outcomes included conventionally measured EI, segmental MES improvements, clinical response, and Patient-Reported Outcome 2 (PRO2) normalization. Outcomes were compared between adalimumab, infliximab, and placebo groups.

Results: Among 300 participants, 217 received infliximab or adalimumab, while 83 received placebo. Healing followed a proximal-to-distal pattern, with the highest EI in the descending colon and the lowest in the rectum. Infliximab-treated patients continued this trend at week 54. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy significantly improved EI vs placebo (42.9% vs 19.3%; P < .001). No segmental MES approach outperformed conventional MES for detecting treatment effects. Combined endpoints (MES ≤1 + PRO2 normalization) better captured therapeutic benefits than PRO2 alone (28.6% vs 13.3%; P = .006).

Conclusions: UC healing follows a proximal-to-distal pattern. Conventional MES remains superior for detecting treatment effects over segmental MES. Further studies should explore alternative endoscopic scoring methodologies.

抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗促进中重度溃疡性结肠炎近端到远端愈合模式。
背景:溃疡性结肠炎(UC)是一种结肠粘膜慢性炎症性疾病,从直肠向近端延伸。然而,UC的节段性愈合模式尚不清楚。内镜改善(EI)是一个关键的治疗终点,通常使用Mayo内镜评分(MES)进行评估,该评分对受影响最严重的区域进行评分,可能会错过部分/节段性愈合。本研究评估UC的愈合模式,并在临床试验中比较传统MES和3段MES方法来检测治疗效果。方法:对HIBISCUS I/II和GARDENIA试验在中重度UC患者(MES >2至降结肠)中进行事后分析。主要终点是抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗的参与者在降结肠、乙状结肠和直肠第10周达到MES≤1的比例。次要结果包括常规测量的EI、节段性MES改善、临床反应和患者报告结果2 (PRO2)正常化。比较阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和安慰剂组的结果。结果:在300名参与者中,217名接受英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗治疗,83名接受安慰剂治疗。愈合遵循近端到远端模式,降结肠的EI最高,直肠的EI最低。英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者在第54周继续这一趋势。与安慰剂相比,抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗显著改善了EI (42.9% vs 19.3%); P结论:UC愈合遵循近端到远端模式。传统MES在检测治疗效果方面仍然优于分段MES。进一步的研究应探索其他内窥镜评分方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信