Behaviour change techniques reported in intervention studies of alcohol and tobacco use: a rapid review.

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2025.2554182
Anuijan Chandran, Scott Veldhuizen, Kamna Mehra, Terri Rodak, Danial Vagharfard, Michelle Pham, Laurie Zawertailo, Jurgen Rehm, Christian S Hendershot, Peter Selby, Nadia Minian
{"title":"Behaviour change techniques reported in intervention studies of alcohol and tobacco use: a rapid review.","authors":"Anuijan Chandran, Scott Veldhuizen, Kamna Mehra, Terri Rodak, Danial Vagharfard, Michelle Pham, Laurie Zawertailo, Jurgen Rehm, Christian S Hendershot, Peter Selby, Nadia Minian","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2025.2554182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines recommend addressing alcohol and tobacco use simultaneously, but few providers offer brief alcohol interventions routinely, and these behaviours are often treated separately. While several interventions targeted dual use, there remains a gap in identifying behaviour change techniques (BCTs) designed to modify processes controlling dual use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify commonly used BCTs in interventions targeting both alcohol and tobacco use, their modes of delivery, and explore which BCTs are associated with smoking cessation and/or alcohol reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Cochrane recommendations, a rapid review to identify BCTs showing promise for reducing dual use was conducted. Using an eligibility criteria, we retrieved relevant papers from databases and used the Behavioural Change Taxonomy V1 tool to identify BCTs showing promise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight articles of the initial systematic search of 2987 papers met the criteria for full article review. Goal setting, action planning, and pharmacological support were the most common BCTs identified. Most studies (33, 87%) had a low or moderate risk of bias. Of these 33 studies, 13 studies (39%) reported statistically significant outcomes of reduction or cessation in smoking behaviour and alcohol consumption. Face to face (25, 76%) was the most common intervention delivery method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical trials identify goal setting, action planning and problem solving to address the dual use of tobacco and alcohol. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to evaluate the true impact of these programmes. Future studies should minimally include these BCTs and study the interactional effects of these BCTs on the efficacy of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"2554182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2025.2554182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend addressing alcohol and tobacco use simultaneously, but few providers offer brief alcohol interventions routinely, and these behaviours are often treated separately. While several interventions targeted dual use, there remains a gap in identifying behaviour change techniques (BCTs) designed to modify processes controlling dual use.

Objective: To identify commonly used BCTs in interventions targeting both alcohol and tobacco use, their modes of delivery, and explore which BCTs are associated with smoking cessation and/or alcohol reduction.

Methods: Following Cochrane recommendations, a rapid review to identify BCTs showing promise for reducing dual use was conducted. Using an eligibility criteria, we retrieved relevant papers from databases and used the Behavioural Change Taxonomy V1 tool to identify BCTs showing promise.

Results: Thirty-eight articles of the initial systematic search of 2987 papers met the criteria for full article review. Goal setting, action planning, and pharmacological support were the most common BCTs identified. Most studies (33, 87%) had a low or moderate risk of bias. Of these 33 studies, 13 studies (39%) reported statistically significant outcomes of reduction or cessation in smoking behaviour and alcohol consumption. Face to face (25, 76%) was the most common intervention delivery method.

Conclusion: Clinical trials identify goal setting, action planning and problem solving to address the dual use of tobacco and alcohol. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to evaluate the true impact of these programmes. Future studies should minimally include these BCTs and study the interactional effects of these BCTs on the efficacy of the intervention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在酒精和烟草使用的干预研究中报告的行为改变技术:快速审查。
背景:临床指南建议同时处理酒精和烟草使用问题,但很少有提供者定期提供简短的酒精干预措施,这些行为通常是分开处理的。虽然一些干预措施针对双重用途,但在确定旨在修改控制双重用途过程的行为改变技术(bct)方面仍然存在差距。目的:确定针对酒精和烟草使用的干预措施中常用的bct及其交付模式,并探索哪些bct与戒烟和/或减少酒精使用相关。方法:根据Cochrane的建议,对bct进行快速评估,以确定bct有减少双重使用的希望。使用资格标准,我们从数据库中检索相关论文,并使用行为改变分类法V1工具识别有希望的bct。结果:初步系统检索的2987篇论文中有38篇符合全文评审标准。目标设定、行动计划和药理学支持是最常见的bct。大多数研究(33.87%)具有低或中等偏倚风险。在这33项研究中,13项研究(39%)报告了减少或停止吸烟行为和饮酒的统计显著结果。面对面(25.76%)是最常见的干预交付方式。结论:临床试验确定了目标设定、行动计划和解决问题的方法,以解决烟酒双重使用问题。需要进行系统的审查和荟萃分析,以评估这些规划的真正影响。未来的研究应尽量不包括这些bct,并研究这些bct对干预效果的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信