Association of Antipsychotic Dose with Surrogate Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nicole M Sarisky, Collin M Clark, Stephanie Seyse, Nicole E Cieri-Hutcherson, Ashley E Woodruff
{"title":"Association of Antipsychotic Dose with Surrogate Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Nicole M Sarisky, Collin M Clark, Stephanie Seyse, Nicole E Cieri-Hutcherson, Ashley E Woodruff","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01250-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antipsychotics are frequently used in hospitalized older adults to manage agitation and delirium, despite limited supporting evidence and known risks. While guidelines recommend low doses and short durations, high doses remain common. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-versus high-dose antipsychotics in hospitalized adults aged ≥ 65 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients from two hospitals within a single health system between August 2021 and August 2023. Patients were included if they received inpatient administration of haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone and excluded for prior antipsychotic use, benzodiazepine use, psychiatric comorbidities, or prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients were stratified into low- and high-dose groups. Low doses were haloperidol 0.5-1 mg, olanzapine 2.5-5 mg, quetiapine 12.5-25 mg, risperidone 0.25-1 mg, or ziprasidone 10-20 mg, and doses were considered high if they were above the criteria for a low dose. The primary outcome was a surrogate marker of efficacy: antipsychotic redosing within 6 h. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), antipsychotic continuation at discharge, and possible antipsychotic-associated adverse events through 90 days post discharge as assessed through index and readmission records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with antipsychotic redosing within 6 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 305 patients were included (low dose: n = 176; high dose: n = 129). Redosing within 6 h occurred at similar rates in low versus high groups (n = 25 [14.2%] versus n = 18 [14.0%], p = 0.950). Multivariable regression showed haloperidol use (compared with quetiapine) was associated with higher odds of redosing. Adverse event rates were numerically higher in the high-dose group, including a greater incidence of inpatient pneumonia and mortality, though most deaths occurred in patients receiving palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low- and high-dose antipsychotics demonstrated similar short-term efficacy, but higher doses may carry increased risk of adverse events in hospitalized older adults. Clinicians should prioritize low-dose regimens and evaluate the necessity of antipsychotic use in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01250-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antipsychotics are frequently used in hospitalized older adults to manage agitation and delirium, despite limited supporting evidence and known risks. While guidelines recommend low doses and short durations, high doses remain common. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-versus high-dose antipsychotics in hospitalized adults aged ≥ 65 years.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients from two hospitals within a single health system between August 2021 and August 2023. Patients were included if they received inpatient administration of haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone and excluded for prior antipsychotic use, benzodiazepine use, psychiatric comorbidities, or prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients were stratified into low- and high-dose groups. Low doses were haloperidol 0.5-1 mg, olanzapine 2.5-5 mg, quetiapine 12.5-25 mg, risperidone 0.25-1 mg, or ziprasidone 10-20 mg, and doses were considered high if they were above the criteria for a low dose. The primary outcome was a surrogate marker of efficacy: antipsychotic redosing within 6 h. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), antipsychotic continuation at discharge, and possible antipsychotic-associated adverse events through 90 days post discharge as assessed through index and readmission records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with antipsychotic redosing within 6 h.

Results: A total of 305 patients were included (low dose: n = 176; high dose: n = 129). Redosing within 6 h occurred at similar rates in low versus high groups (n = 25 [14.2%] versus n = 18 [14.0%], p = 0.950). Multivariable regression showed haloperidol use (compared with quetiapine) was associated with higher odds of redosing. Adverse event rates were numerically higher in the high-dose group, including a greater incidence of inpatient pneumonia and mortality, though most deaths occurred in patients receiving palliative care.

Conclusions: Low- and high-dose antipsychotics demonstrated similar short-term efficacy, but higher doses may carry increased risk of adverse events in hospitalized older adults. Clinicians should prioritize low-dose regimens and evaluate the necessity of antipsychotic use in this vulnerable population.

住院老年人抗精神病药物剂量与替代疗效和安全性结局的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
抗精神病药物常用于住院老年人控制躁动和谵妄,尽管支持证据和已知风险有限。虽然指南建议低剂量和短时间,但高剂量仍然很常见。本研究评估了低剂量与高剂量抗精神病药物在≥65岁住院成人中的疗效和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2021年8月至2023年8月间来自单一卫生系统内两家医院的患者。纳入住院期间服用氟哌啶醇、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮或齐拉西酮的患者,排除既往使用抗精神病药物、苯二氮卓类药物、精神合并症或长期入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者。患者被分为低剂量组和高剂量组。低剂量为氟哌啶醇0.5-1毫克、奥氮平2.5-5毫克、喹硫平12.5-25毫克、利培酮0.25-1毫克或齐拉西酮10-20毫克,如果剂量高于低剂量标准,则被认为是高剂量。主要结局是疗效的替代指标:6小时内抗精神病药物重新给药。次要结局包括住院时间(LOS)、出院时抗精神病药物的持续时间,以及出院后90天内可能出现的抗精神病药物相关不良事件(通过指数和再入院记录进行评估)。结果:共纳入305例患者(低剂量:n = 176;高剂量:n = 129)。低剂量组和高剂量组在6小时内重新给药的发生率相似(n = 25[14.2%]对n = 18 [14.0%], p = 0.950)。多变量回归显示氟哌啶醇的使用(与喹硫平相比)与更高的再给药几率相关。高剂量组的不良事件发生率更高,包括住院肺炎和死亡率的发生率更高,尽管大多数死亡发生在接受姑息治疗的患者中。结论:低剂量和高剂量抗精神病药物表现出相似的短期疗效,但高剂量可能会增加住院老年人不良事件的风险。临床医生应优先考虑低剂量方案,并评估在这一弱势群体中使用抗精神病药物的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信