Perceptions of patients and healthcare providers on BRCA testing in early-stage breast cancer: Qualitative research findings

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jagadeswara Rao Earla, Emily Mulvihill, Josh Lankin, Lauren Howell, Alexandra Kissling, Jaime Mejia, Xiaoqing Xu, Kathryn Mishkin
{"title":"Perceptions of patients and healthcare providers on BRCA testing in early-stage breast cancer: Qualitative research findings","authors":"Jagadeswara Rao Earla,&nbsp;Emily Mulvihill,&nbsp;Josh Lankin,&nbsp;Lauren Howell,&nbsp;Alexandra Kissling,&nbsp;Jaime Mejia,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Xu,&nbsp;Kathryn Mishkin","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on motivators and barriers to genetic testing among patients with cancer has yet to evaluate the impact of targeted treatments. This study examined the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) on patient decision-making around genetic testing, specifically <i>gBRCA</i> (germline BReast CAncer gene) testing, in early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Semi-structured telephone interviews were performed in the United States with female patients diagnosed with eBC (<i>n</i> = 7 tested and 5 untested) in 2017 or later, and HCPs treating eBC patients, including medical oncologists (<i>n</i> = 12) and genetic counselors (GCs) (<i>n</i> = 8). Patients and HCPs were recruited via panel databases between January and February 2023. Patients, oncologists, and genetic counselors were asked about influences on BRCA testing and the selection of adjuvant genetically targeted treatment for patients with BRCA. Data were analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches using content analysis. Patients and HCPs saw having complete information about their breast cancer and treatment options as driving patients' choice to undergo genetic testing. Patients and oncologists also recognized the influence of physician recommendations to test and the importance of patients being able to share testing results with family. Reluctance to test was linked to perceived lack of benefit for the patient's family, fear of losing insurance coverage, and increasing patient worries. HCPs indicated that testing is further impeded by patients' distrust of the medical community and the limited availability of genetic counselors. Patients were interested in treatments with high efficacy that would lower the chance of cancer recurrence, including targeted therapies. In choosing both testing and treatment, patients value information that can empower them to achieve their goals of normalcy and remission. Oncologists and GCs can respect patients' values and goals by engaging them in the decisions for testing and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on motivators and barriers to genetic testing among patients with cancer has yet to evaluate the impact of targeted treatments. This study examined the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) on patient decision-making around genetic testing, specifically gBRCA (germline BReast CAncer gene) testing, in early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Semi-structured telephone interviews were performed in the United States with female patients diagnosed with eBC (n = 7 tested and 5 untested) in 2017 or later, and HCPs treating eBC patients, including medical oncologists (n = 12) and genetic counselors (GCs) (n = 8). Patients and HCPs were recruited via panel databases between January and February 2023. Patients, oncologists, and genetic counselors were asked about influences on BRCA testing and the selection of adjuvant genetically targeted treatment for patients with BRCA. Data were analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches using content analysis. Patients and HCPs saw having complete information about their breast cancer and treatment options as driving patients' choice to undergo genetic testing. Patients and oncologists also recognized the influence of physician recommendations to test and the importance of patients being able to share testing results with family. Reluctance to test was linked to perceived lack of benefit for the patient's family, fear of losing insurance coverage, and increasing patient worries. HCPs indicated that testing is further impeded by patients' distrust of the medical community and the limited availability of genetic counselors. Patients were interested in treatments with high efficacy that would lower the chance of cancer recurrence, including targeted therapies. In choosing both testing and treatment, patients value information that can empower them to achieve their goals of normalcy and remission. Oncologists and GCs can respect patients' values and goals by engaging them in the decisions for testing and treatment.

Abstract Image

患者和医疗保健提供者对早期乳腺癌BRCA检测的看法:定性研究结果
对癌症患者进行基因检测的动机和障碍的研究尚未评估靶向治疗的影响。本研究考察了患者和医疗保健提供者(HCPs)对早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者基因检测决策的看法,特别是gBRCA(种系乳腺癌基因)检测。在美国对2017年或之后诊断为eBC的女性患者(n = 7检测和5未检测)以及治疗eBC患者的HCPs进行了半结构化电话访谈,包括医学肿瘤学家(n = 12)和遗传咨询师(GCs) (n = 8)。患者和HCPs在2023年1月至2月期间通过小组数据库招募。患者、肿瘤学家和遗传咨询师被问及BRCA检测和BRCA患者辅助基因靶向治疗选择的影响。数据分析使用演绎和归纳方法使用内容分析。患者和HCPs认为,掌握有关其乳腺癌和治疗方案的完整信息是促使患者选择接受基因检测的原因。患者和肿瘤学家也认识到医生对检测建议的影响,以及患者能够与家人分享检测结果的重要性。不愿进行检测与患者家属认为缺乏益处、担心失去保险覆盖范围以及患者担忧增加有关。HCPs指出,患者对医学界的不信任和遗传咨询师的有限可用性进一步阻碍了检测。患者对能够降低癌症复发几率的高效治疗方法感兴趣,包括靶向治疗。在选择检测和治疗时,患者重视能够帮助他们实现正常和缓解目标的信息。肿瘤学家和GCs可以通过让患者参与检测和治疗的决策来尊重患者的价值观和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信