Dead or Alive? Challenges in Discriminating Dietary From Host-Associated Community via RNA and DNA Metabarcoding in a Filter Feeder

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Isabelle Junk, Lina Frank, Nina Marschel, Henrik Krehenwinkel
{"title":"Dead or Alive? Challenges in Discriminating Dietary From Host-Associated Community via RNA and DNA Metabarcoding in a Filter Feeder","authors":"Isabelle Junk,&nbsp;Lina Frank,&nbsp;Nina Marschel,&nbsp;Henrik Krehenwinkel","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA metabarcoding has found application in a range of research areas by simplifying the collection of high-quality field data in a cost-efficient way. In biodiversity studies, environmental DNA metabarcoding of filter feeders like mussels and sponges has recently gained attention. Due to their continuous filtering activity, they accumulate a high amount of genetic signatures from their environment in their tissue. However, it can be difficult to separate genetic signatures of ingested dietary taxa from endobiotic ones originating from parasites or commensals living within the host. This issue parallels a broader problem in environmental DNA-based biodiversity studies: the inability to differentiate between DNA derived from living and dead organisms. A recent attempt to address this problem is using environmental RNA metabarcoding, which is believed to specifically represent the live and active community of an ecosystem. Therefore, we tested whether endobionts, as metabolically active organisms, can be distinguished from dietary taxa, as the presumed dead community, in a parallel RNA and DNA metabarcoding approach. We targeted nuclear 18S rDNA and rRNA to amplify mussel-associated communities (dietary and endobiotic taxa) in samples of <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i> and <i>Mytilus edulis</i>. Our results do not reveal any presence/absence or abundance pattern in the RNA and DNA library that could be used to distinguish dietary from endobiotic signatures. However, we found that over 40% of all genetic signatures were detected by RNA only and that those accounted for &lt; 4% of the total reads. This study thus demonstrates the outstanding sensitivity of RNA metabarcoding in comparison to DNA metabarcoding and suggests that using (environmental) RNA may be a way of capturing a larger proportion of the biodiversity in a given ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70188","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA metabarcoding has found application in a range of research areas by simplifying the collection of high-quality field data in a cost-efficient way. In biodiversity studies, environmental DNA metabarcoding of filter feeders like mussels and sponges has recently gained attention. Due to their continuous filtering activity, they accumulate a high amount of genetic signatures from their environment in their tissue. However, it can be difficult to separate genetic signatures of ingested dietary taxa from endobiotic ones originating from parasites or commensals living within the host. This issue parallels a broader problem in environmental DNA-based biodiversity studies: the inability to differentiate between DNA derived from living and dead organisms. A recent attempt to address this problem is using environmental RNA metabarcoding, which is believed to specifically represent the live and active community of an ecosystem. Therefore, we tested whether endobionts, as metabolically active organisms, can be distinguished from dietary taxa, as the presumed dead community, in a parallel RNA and DNA metabarcoding approach. We targeted nuclear 18S rDNA and rRNA to amplify mussel-associated communities (dietary and endobiotic taxa) in samples of Dreissena polymorpha and Mytilus edulis. Our results do not reveal any presence/absence or abundance pattern in the RNA and DNA library that could be used to distinguish dietary from endobiotic signatures. However, we found that over 40% of all genetic signatures were detected by RNA only and that those accounted for < 4% of the total reads. This study thus demonstrates the outstanding sensitivity of RNA metabarcoding in comparison to DNA metabarcoding and suggests that using (environmental) RNA may be a way of capturing a larger proportion of the biodiversity in a given ecosystem.

Abstract Image

死还是活?通过RNA和DNA元条形码在滤食性动物中区分饲粮与宿主相关群落的挑战
环境DNA元条形码通过以经济高效的方式简化高质量野外数据的收集,在一系列研究领域得到了应用。在生物多样性的研究中,贻贝和海绵等滤食性动物的环境DNA元条形码最近受到了人们的关注。由于它们持续的过滤活动,它们在组织中积累了大量来自环境的遗传特征。然而,很难将摄取的膳食分类群的遗传特征与寄主体内的寄生虫或共生生物的内源性分类群区分开来。这个问题与基于环境DNA的生物多样性研究中的一个更广泛的问题相似:无法区分来自活生物体和死生物体的DNA。最近一项解决这个问题的尝试是使用环境RNA元条形码,它被认为是生态系统中生活和活跃的社区的具体代表。因此,我们采用平行RNA和DNA元条形码的方法,测试了作为代谢活性生物的内生生物是否可以与假定死亡的膳食分类群区分开来。我们以核18S rDNA和rRNA为目标,扩增了多态贻贝(Dreissena polymorpha)和贻贝(Mytilus edulis)样品中的贻贝相关群落(饮食和内源性分类群)。我们的研究结果没有揭示任何RNA和DNA文库中的存在/缺失或丰度模式,可以用来区分饮食和内源性特征。然而,我们发现超过40%的遗传特征仅由RNA检测到,这些特征占总读取量的4%。因此,该研究表明,与DNA元条形码相比,RNA元条形码具有突出的敏感性,并表明使用(环境)RNA可能是捕获给定生态系统中更大比例生物多样性的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信