The Changing Transplant Landscape in the Era of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Word of Caution

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Julie Semenchuk, Eliza Tuff-Gordon, Xiayi Ma, Jenna Sykes, Stephanie Y. Cheng, Meghan Aversa, Cecilia Chaparro, Elizabeth Tullis, Anne L. Stephenson
{"title":"The Changing Transplant Landscape in the Era of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Word of Caution","authors":"Julie Semenchuk,&nbsp;Eliza Tuff-Gordon,&nbsp;Xiayi Ma,&nbsp;Jenna Sykes,&nbsp;Stephanie Y. Cheng,&nbsp;Meghan Aversa,&nbsp;Cecilia Chaparro,&nbsp;Elizabeth Tullis,&nbsp;Anne L. Stephenson","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically changed the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, including in those who require lung transplantation. The objectives of the study were to describe the cohort demographics and outcomes of primary lung transplant recipients before and after the availability of ETI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a descriptive study of lung transplants performed at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program for CF during two time periods: 2019 (pre-ETI era) and 2021–2023 (post-ETI era). All subjects were referred from the Adult CF program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Data were obtained from chart review and the Toronto Lung Transplant database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival probability at 1 year post-transplant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 22 lung transplants performed in 2019 (19 [86.4%] primary and 3 [13.6%] re-transplants) compared to 11 lung transplants (8 [72.7%] primary and 3 [27.3%] re-transplants) in the post-ETI era. In primary transplant recipients, median age was 29.4 years (Range 18.6–67.6 years) in 2019 compared to 30.0 years (Range 19.1–64.0 years) in 2021–2023. In the post-ETI era, none of the individuals had a deltaF508 variant, compared to 84% in 2019. One-year survival probability was lower in the post-ETI era (62.5% vs. 84.2%, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Lung transplant recipients in the post-ETI era were more complex with high-risk characteristics and had worse post-transplant outcomes. This study highlights the importance of further investigation to better understand the impact of ETI on transplant referral patterns, recipient characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes in the CF population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70317","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically changed the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, including in those who require lung transplantation. The objectives of the study were to describe the cohort demographics and outcomes of primary lung transplant recipients before and after the availability of ETI.

Methods

This is a descriptive study of lung transplants performed at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program for CF during two time periods: 2019 (pre-ETI era) and 2021–2023 (post-ETI era). All subjects were referred from the Adult CF program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Data were obtained from chart review and the Toronto Lung Transplant database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival probability at 1 year post-transplant.

Results

There were 22 lung transplants performed in 2019 (19 [86.4%] primary and 3 [13.6%] re-transplants) compared to 11 lung transplants (8 [72.7%] primary and 3 [27.3%] re-transplants) in the post-ETI era. In primary transplant recipients, median age was 29.4 years (Range 18.6–67.6 years) in 2019 compared to 30.0 years (Range 19.1–64.0 years) in 2021–2023. In the post-ETI era, none of the individuals had a deltaF508 variant, compared to 84% in 2019. One-year survival probability was lower in the post-ETI era (62.5% vs. 84.2%, respectively).

Conclusion

Lung transplant recipients in the post-ETI era were more complex with high-risk characteristics and had worse post-transplant outcomes. This study highlights the importance of further investigation to better understand the impact of ETI on transplant referral patterns, recipient characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes in the CF population.

Abstract Image

在Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor时代不断变化的移植景观:一个警告
elexaftor /tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI)极大地改变了囊性纤维化(CF)治疗的前景,包括那些需要肺移植的患者。该研究的目的是描述原发性肺移植受者在使用ETI之前和之后的队列人口统计学和结果。这是一项描述性研究,对多伦多肺移植项目在2019年(eti前时代)和2021-2023年(eti后时代)两个时间段进行的CF肺移植进行了研究。所有受试者均来自多伦多圣迈克尔医院的成人CF项目。数据来自图表回顾和多伦多肺移植数据库。Kaplan-Meier法用于估计移植后1年的生存率。结果2019年共进行肺移植22例(原发19例[86.4%],再移植3例[13.6%]),而后eti时代共进行肺移植11例(原发8例[72.7%],再移植3例[27.3%])。在初级移植受者中,2019年的中位年龄为29.4岁(18.6-67.6岁),而2021-2023年的中位年龄为30.0岁(19.1-64.0岁)。在后eti时代,没有人携带deltaF508变体,而2019年这一比例为84%。eti后的1年生存率较低(分别为62.5%和84.2%)。结论后eti时代肺移植受者更为复杂,具有高危特征,移植后预后较差。这项研究强调了进一步调查的重要性,以更好地了解ETI对CF人群移植转诊模式、受体特征和移植后结局的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信