Artificial intelligence in engineering education research: Using machine learning models to predict undergraduate engineering students' persistence to graduation

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ibukun Osunbunmi, Taiwo Feyijimi, Stephanie Cutler, Yashin Brijmohan, Lexy Arinze, Viyon Dansu, Bolaji Bamidele, Jennifer Wu, Robert Rabb
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in engineering education research: Using machine learning models to predict undergraduate engineering students' persistence to graduation","authors":"Ibukun Osunbunmi,&nbsp;Taiwo Feyijimi,&nbsp;Stephanie Cutler,&nbsp;Yashin Brijmohan,&nbsp;Lexy Arinze,&nbsp;Viyon Dansu,&nbsp;Bolaji Bamidele,&nbsp;Jennifer Wu,&nbsp;Robert Rabb","doi":"10.1002/jee.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Attrition of engineering students continues to be a concern in higher education. Despite indications that students who opt to leave engineering programs may go on to make meaningful contributions in other fields more aligned to their interests, it remains essential to support those who choose to stay in engineering with the necessary resources, mentorship, and enabling environments to thrive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores predictors of persistence to graduation for students in a College of Engineering (CoE), examining pre-college preparation (SAT scores), academic performance in core courses, demographic factors, and engagement in co-curricular activities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed a 10-year dataset (fall 2007 to fall 2016) from a US R1 university's CoE, comprising 16,292 observations. Machine learning techniques, including dimensionality reduction (forward, backward, and unidirectional stepwise regression), explainable artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling (K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and gradient boosting), were applied to identify significant predictors of persistence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Key predictors of persistence included students' GPAs in their first two years and SAT math. Additional factors, although not consistently ranked highly by all models, include performance in PHYS 211, CHM 110, and MAT 140 (Physics 1, Chemistry 1, and Calculus 1, respectively). Demographics and engaging in co-curricular activities also contribute to persistence, although not as significantly as academic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings from the machine learning models extend Tinto's theory of persistence, and identify key factors that predict engineering students' persistence to graduation. We recommend that institutions engage in strategic planning and policymaking as part of their collective effort to reduce engineering student attrition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Attrition of engineering students continues to be a concern in higher education. Despite indications that students who opt to leave engineering programs may go on to make meaningful contributions in other fields more aligned to their interests, it remains essential to support those who choose to stay in engineering with the necessary resources, mentorship, and enabling environments to thrive.

Purpose

This study explores predictors of persistence to graduation for students in a College of Engineering (CoE), examining pre-college preparation (SAT scores), academic performance in core courses, demographic factors, and engagement in co-curricular activities.

Methods

We analyzed a 10-year dataset (fall 2007 to fall 2016) from a US R1 university's CoE, comprising 16,292 observations. Machine learning techniques, including dimensionality reduction (forward, backward, and unidirectional stepwise regression), explainable artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling (K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and gradient boosting), were applied to identify significant predictors of persistence.

Results

Key predictors of persistence included students' GPAs in their first two years and SAT math. Additional factors, although not consistently ranked highly by all models, include performance in PHYS 211, CHM 110, and MAT 140 (Physics 1, Chemistry 1, and Calculus 1, respectively). Demographics and engaging in co-curricular activities also contribute to persistence, although not as significantly as academic factors.

Conclusion

Findings from the machine learning models extend Tinto's theory of persistence, and identify key factors that predict engineering students' persistence to graduation. We recommend that institutions engage in strategic planning and policymaking as part of their collective effort to reduce engineering student attrition.

Abstract Image

人工智能在工程教育研究中的应用:利用机器学习模型预测工程本科学生的毕业坚持性
工科学生的流失一直是高等教育中一个令人担忧的问题。尽管有迹象表明,选择离开工程专业的学生可能会在其他更符合他们兴趣的领域做出有意义的贡献,但仍然有必要为那些选择留在工程专业的学生提供必要的资源、指导和有利的环境,让他们茁壮成长。本研究探讨了工程学院(CoE)学生坚持毕业的预测因素,考察了大学前准备(SAT分数)、核心课程的学习成绩、人口统计学因素和参与课外活动。我们分析了来自美国R1大学CoE的10年数据集(2007年秋季至2016年秋季),包括16,292个观测值。机器学习技术,包括降维(前向、后向和单向逐步回归)、可解释的人工智能和预测建模(k近邻、逻辑回归、决策树、人工神经网络和梯度增强),被用于识别持久性的重要预测因子。结果坚持的关键预测因素包括学生前两年的gpa和SAT数学。其他因素,虽然不是所有模型都排在很高的位置,包括物理211,CHM 110和MAT 140(分别是物理1,化学1和微积分1)的表现。人口统计和参与课外活动也有助于坚持,尽管没有学术因素那么重要。机器学习模型的发现扩展了Tinto的坚持理论,并确定了预测工程专业学生坚持到毕业的关键因素。我们建议各院校参与战略规划和政策制定,作为减少工程专业学生流失的集体努力的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信