Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines: Methodological Guidance Report

Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen B. Guinée, Miranda W. Langendam, Pauline de Heer, Stefanie N. Hofstede, Frank Willem Jansen, Charlotte T. J. Michels, Dutch Expert Panel
{"title":"Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines: Methodological Guidance Report","authors":"Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen,&nbsp;Jeroen B. Guinée,&nbsp;Miranda W. Langendam,&nbsp;Pauline de Heer,&nbsp;Stefanie N. Hofstede,&nbsp;Frank Willem Jansen,&nbsp;Charlotte T. J. Michels,&nbsp;Dutch Expert Panel","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The global healthcare sector significantly contributes to climate change and other environmental impacts. Despite this, environmental sustainability considerations are often missing from evidence-based clinical guidelines. To address this gap, we developed a methodological guidance report focused on integrating environmental sustainability into clinical guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An interdisciplinary expert panel systematically developed this methodological guidance report. Data collection involved expert panel meetings and consultations with stakeholders, based on the development of a sustainability guideline focused on reducing the environmental impact of the operating room (OR). The process included an initial inventory and prioritisation phase, guideline development following the GRADE approach, and finalisation and publication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The generated insights offer a standardised and readily applicable guidance report for integrating environmental sustainability into clinical guidelines across medical disciplines. This allows guideline developers to implement sustainability considerations in clinical guidelines. Environmental sustainability should be addressed at the start of guideline development, involving interdisciplinary experts. Approaches include integrating environmental outcomes into the PICO framework or adding a search question focused on the environmental impact of interventions. Furthermore, environmental sustainability should be integrated in the Evidence-to-Decision framework. If LCAs are included, both the critical appraisal for study quality of LCAs and the GRADE approach for quality of the evidence are recommended.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>This methodological guidance report facilitates a stepwise approach of integrating environmental sustainability into clinical practice through evidence-based guideline development. While further evaluation and implementation in clinical practice is needed, the framework supports more sustainable clinical decision-making and contributes to promoting planetary health.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The global healthcare sector significantly contributes to climate change and other environmental impacts. Despite this, environmental sustainability considerations are often missing from evidence-based clinical guidelines. To address this gap, we developed a methodological guidance report focused on integrating environmental sustainability into clinical guidelines.

Methods

An interdisciplinary expert panel systematically developed this methodological guidance report. Data collection involved expert panel meetings and consultations with stakeholders, based on the development of a sustainability guideline focused on reducing the environmental impact of the operating room (OR). The process included an initial inventory and prioritisation phase, guideline development following the GRADE approach, and finalisation and publication.

Results

The generated insights offer a standardised and readily applicable guidance report for integrating environmental sustainability into clinical guidelines across medical disciplines. This allows guideline developers to implement sustainability considerations in clinical guidelines. Environmental sustainability should be addressed at the start of guideline development, involving interdisciplinary experts. Approaches include integrating environmental outcomes into the PICO framework or adding a search question focused on the environmental impact of interventions. Furthermore, environmental sustainability should be integrated in the Evidence-to-Decision framework. If LCAs are included, both the critical appraisal for study quality of LCAs and the GRADE approach for quality of the evidence are recommended.

Interpretation

This methodological guidance report facilitates a stepwise approach of integrating environmental sustainability into clinical practice through evidence-based guideline development. While further evaluation and implementation in clinical practice is needed, the framework supports more sustainable clinical decision-making and contributes to promoting planetary health.

Abstract Image

将环境可持续性纳入循证临床指南:方法学指导报告
全球医疗保健部门对气候变化和其他环境影响做出了重大贡献。尽管如此,基于证据的临床指南往往缺少对环境可持续性的考虑。为了解决这一差距,我们开发了一份方法指导报告,重点是将环境可持续性纳入临床指南。方法由跨学科专家小组系统编制方法学指导报告。数据收集涉及专家小组会议和与利益相关者的磋商,以制定可持续发展指南为基础,重点是减少手术室(OR)的环境影响。该过程包括初始清单和优先排序阶段,按照GRADE方法制定指南,以及最终定稿和发布。结果生成的见解为将环境可持续性纳入医学学科的临床指南提供了标准化和易于应用的指导报告。这允许指南开发者在临床指南中实施可持续性考虑。环境可持续性应在准则制定之初就得到处理,并由跨学科专家参与。方法包括将环境结果纳入PICO框架或增加一个关注干预措施对环境影响的搜索问题。此外,环境可持续性应纳入从证据到决策的框架。如果包括lca,则建议对lca的研究质量进行批判性评价,并对证据质量采用GRADE方法。本方法学指导报告通过循证指南的制定,促进了将环境可持续性纳入临床实践的逐步方法。虽然需要在临床实践中进一步评价和执行,但该框架支持更可持续的临床决策,并有助于促进地球健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信