A Tick of the Clock: Finding the Sweet Spot in Tilt Table Test. The Effectiveness of Short-Duration Head-Up Tilt Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Suspected Vasovagal Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Syncope Unit
{"title":"A Tick of the Clock: Finding the Sweet Spot in Tilt Table Test. The Effectiveness of Short-Duration Head-Up Tilt Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Suspected Vasovagal Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Syncope Unit","authors":"Parvin Kalhor, Parichehr Ghahari, Nader Asgari, Arash Jalali, Saeed Sadeghian","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The head-up tilt test (HUTT) has been markedly changed over the years, especially in the specified time for the passive and active phases. However, a consensus-based protocol has yet to be established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Seven hundred twenty-four patients suspected of vasovagal syncope who underwent HUTT through one of the protocols of 15to 20-min testing for each active/passive phase (the whole test duration was 30 or 40 min, respectively) were evaluated. Then, the positive responses were recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>470 (64.9%) and 254 (35.1%) patients in the 15- and 20-min groups, respectively. Overall, 238 patients (50.6%) in the 15-min group and 140 patients (55.1%) in the 20-min group had positive responses (<i>p</i> = 0.25). There was no significant difference in the number of positive responses between the 15- and 20-min groups in any of the passive (<i>p</i> = 0.53) and active (<i>p</i> = 0.3) phases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The 15-min HUTT protocol has similar results to the 20-min protocol. Saving 10 min for each test has several potential benefits, such as increasing patient acceptance, decreasing patient discomfort, and enabling the conduct of more tests in a day in a syncope unit.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70190","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The head-up tilt test (HUTT) has been markedly changed over the years, especially in the specified time for the passive and active phases. However, a consensus-based protocol has yet to be established.
Methods
Seven hundred twenty-four patients suspected of vasovagal syncope who underwent HUTT through one of the protocols of 15to 20-min testing for each active/passive phase (the whole test duration was 30 or 40 min, respectively) were evaluated. Then, the positive responses were recorded.
Results
470 (64.9%) and 254 (35.1%) patients in the 15- and 20-min groups, respectively. Overall, 238 patients (50.6%) in the 15-min group and 140 patients (55.1%) in the 20-min group had positive responses (p = 0.25). There was no significant difference in the number of positive responses between the 15- and 20-min groups in any of the passive (p = 0.53) and active (p = 0.3) phases.
Conclusion
The 15-min HUTT protocol has similar results to the 20-min protocol. Saving 10 min for each test has several potential benefits, such as increasing patient acceptance, decreasing patient discomfort, and enabling the conduct of more tests in a day in a syncope unit.