CT radiation exposure and management of delayed pseudoaneurysms in pediatric liver and spleen injuries: A multicenter study

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Atsushi Tanikawa, Daisuke Kudo, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Morihiro Katsura, Katsunori Ono, Yohei Inaba, Shigeki Kushimoto
{"title":"CT radiation exposure and management of delayed pseudoaneurysms in pediatric liver and spleen injuries: A multicenter study","authors":"Atsushi Tanikawa,&nbsp;Daisuke Kudo,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Ohbe,&nbsp;Morihiro Katsura,&nbsp;Katsunori Ono,&nbsp;Yohei Inaba,&nbsp;Shigeki Kushimoto","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Minimizing radiation exposure and preventing pseudoaneurysm rupture are crucial for pediatric patients with delayed pseudoaneurysm following blunt liver and/or spleen injuries. However, the radiation exposure from follow-up CT scans in patients managed conservatively or with prophylactic embolization remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate radiation exposure from CT scans based on these management strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This research was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, retrospective observational study that included pediatric patients (≤16 years old) who sustained blunt liver and/or spleen injuries at 83 institutions in Japan from 2008 to 2019. Patients diagnosed with delayed pseudoaneurysm, defined as a newly detected pseudoaneurysm on or after the second day post-injury, were included. This descriptive study compared CT-related radiation exposure and rupture rates between patients with and without prophylactic embolization, with radiation exposure assessed using dose length product.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty patients had delayed pseudoaneurysm. Of these, 28 (56%) did not receive prophylactic embolization. The sum of dose length product in patients with delayed pseudoaneurysm not receiving prophylactic embolization was 4203 (1802–7503) mGy·cm, compared with 2492 (1258–4457) mGy·cm in those receiving prophylactic embolization (<i>p</i> = 0.12). Then, pseudoaneurysm rupture occurred in 32% of no prophylactic embolization patients, whereas no ruptures were observed in the embolization group (<i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pediatric patients not receiving prophylactic embolization trended to have high radiation exposure from CT scans and had a higher rate of ruptured delayed pseudoaneurysm compared to those receiving embolization. These findings support further study of strategies to reduce rupture risk and radiation exposure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Minimizing radiation exposure and preventing pseudoaneurysm rupture are crucial for pediatric patients with delayed pseudoaneurysm following blunt liver and/or spleen injuries. However, the radiation exposure from follow-up CT scans in patients managed conservatively or with prophylactic embolization remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate radiation exposure from CT scans based on these management strategies.

Methods

This research was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, retrospective observational study that included pediatric patients (≤16 years old) who sustained blunt liver and/or spleen injuries at 83 institutions in Japan from 2008 to 2019. Patients diagnosed with delayed pseudoaneurysm, defined as a newly detected pseudoaneurysm on or after the second day post-injury, were included. This descriptive study compared CT-related radiation exposure and rupture rates between patients with and without prophylactic embolization, with radiation exposure assessed using dose length product.

Results

Fifty patients had delayed pseudoaneurysm. Of these, 28 (56%) did not receive prophylactic embolization. The sum of dose length product in patients with delayed pseudoaneurysm not receiving prophylactic embolization was 4203 (1802–7503) mGy·cm, compared with 2492 (1258–4457) mGy·cm in those receiving prophylactic embolization (p = 0.12). Then, pseudoaneurysm rupture occurred in 32% of no prophylactic embolization patients, whereas no ruptures were observed in the embolization group (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Pediatric patients not receiving prophylactic embolization trended to have high radiation exposure from CT scans and had a higher rate of ruptured delayed pseudoaneurysm compared to those receiving embolization. These findings support further study of strategies to reduce rupture risk and radiation exposure.

Abstract Image

儿童肝脾损伤迟发性假性动脉瘤的CT放射暴露与治疗:一项多中心研究
目的减少辐射暴露和预防假性动脉瘤破裂是治疗钝性肝和/或脾脏损伤后迟发性假性动脉瘤的关键。然而,保守治疗或预防性栓塞治疗患者随访CT扫描的辐射暴露情况尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估基于这些管理策略的CT扫描辐射暴露。本研究是对一项多中心回顾性观察性研究的二次分析,该研究纳入了2008年至2019年日本83家机构中遭受钝性肝和/或脾脏损伤的儿科患者(≤16岁)。被诊断为延迟性假性动脉瘤的患者,定义为在损伤后第二天或之后新发现的假性动脉瘤。这项描述性研究比较了预防性栓塞和非预防性栓塞患者的ct相关辐射暴露和破裂率,并使用剂量长度乘积评估辐射暴露。结果50例患者出现迟发性假性动脉瘤。其中28例(56%)未接受预防性栓塞治疗。未接受预防性栓塞治疗的延迟性假性动脉瘤患者的剂量长度乘积总和为4203 (1802-7503)mGy·cm,而接受预防性栓塞治疗的患者的剂量长度乘积总和为2492 (1258-4457)mGy·cm (p = 0.12)。未预防性栓塞的患者中假性动脉瘤破裂发生率为32%,而栓塞组未发生破裂(p = 0.003)。结论未接受预防性栓塞治疗的儿童患者CT扫描有高辐射暴露倾向,延迟性假性动脉瘤破裂率高于接受栓塞治疗的儿童。这些发现支持进一步研究降低破裂风险和辐射暴露的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信