Paradigm shift of agroforestry in Slovakia: from an unknown concept to a concrete policy support scheme in less than 5 years

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Anna Mária Mitrová, Milada Šťastná, Ladislav Bakay
{"title":"Paradigm shift of agroforestry in Slovakia: from an unknown concept to a concrete policy support scheme in less than 5 years","authors":"Anna Mária Mitrová,&nbsp;Milada Šťastná,&nbsp;Ladislav Bakay","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01270-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite growing EU-level support, agroforestry remains poorly developed in many Central and Eastern European countries, including Slovakia. This study presents the first sociological assessment of agroforestry development in Slovakia, focusing on stakeholder perceptions, system preferences, and policy barriers. Using a qualitative, multi-actor case study approach, we conducted participatory fieldwork, focus groups, and open-ended surveys between 2022 and 2023. Findings reveal rapid growth in awareness and interest following targeted engagement activities. Stakeholders identified silvopastoral systems as particularly suitable for abandoned upland areas and silvoarable systems for intensively farmed lowlands. Environmental and cultural benefits—such as biodiversity enhancement, landscape aesthetics, and microclimate regulation—were key motivators, whereas economic incentives played a secondary role. However, structural barriers persist. Respondents cited legal ambiguity, limited advisory services, and restrictive implementation of the first agroforestry support measure under the CAP Strategic Plan (2023–2027) as major obstacles. Many viewed the policy as overly prescriptive and poorly aligned with on-the-ground realities. We conclude that participatory, context-specific approaches are essential to designing effective agroforestry policy. Slovakia’s experience offers broader lessons for post-socialist countries aiming to integrate agroforestry into multifunctional land-use systems under the European Green Deal and CAP reforms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01270-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01270-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing EU-level support, agroforestry remains poorly developed in many Central and Eastern European countries, including Slovakia. This study presents the first sociological assessment of agroforestry development in Slovakia, focusing on stakeholder perceptions, system preferences, and policy barriers. Using a qualitative, multi-actor case study approach, we conducted participatory fieldwork, focus groups, and open-ended surveys between 2022 and 2023. Findings reveal rapid growth in awareness and interest following targeted engagement activities. Stakeholders identified silvopastoral systems as particularly suitable for abandoned upland areas and silvoarable systems for intensively farmed lowlands. Environmental and cultural benefits—such as biodiversity enhancement, landscape aesthetics, and microclimate regulation—were key motivators, whereas economic incentives played a secondary role. However, structural barriers persist. Respondents cited legal ambiguity, limited advisory services, and restrictive implementation of the first agroforestry support measure under the CAP Strategic Plan (2023–2027) as major obstacles. Many viewed the policy as overly prescriptive and poorly aligned with on-the-ground realities. We conclude that participatory, context-specific approaches are essential to designing effective agroforestry policy. Slovakia’s experience offers broader lessons for post-socialist countries aiming to integrate agroforestry into multifunctional land-use systems under the European Green Deal and CAP reforms.

斯洛伐克农林业的范式转变:在不到5年的时间里从一个未知的概念到一个具体的政策支持方案
尽管欧盟一级的支持越来越多,但在包括斯洛伐克在内的许多中欧和东欧国家,农林业仍然不发达。本研究提出了斯洛伐克农林业发展的第一个社会学评估,重点关注利益相关者的看法、制度偏好和政策障碍。采用定性、多参与者案例研究方法,我们在2022年至2023年间进行了参与性实地调查、焦点小组和开放式调查。调查结果显示,在有针对性的参与活动之后,意识和兴趣迅速增长。利益相关者认为,森林放牧系统特别适合于废弃的高地地区,而森林耕作系统则适合于集约耕种的低地。环境和文化利益——如生物多样性的增强、景观美学和小气候调节——是主要的激励因素,而经济激励则起着次要的作用。然而,结构性障碍依然存在。受访者认为,法律含糊不清、咨询服务有限以及CAP战略计划(2023-2027)下第一项农林业支持措施的限制性实施是主要障碍。许多人认为该政策过于规范,与实际情况不符。我们的结论是,参与性的、针对具体情况的方法对于设计有效的农林业政策至关重要。斯洛伐克的经验为旨在根据《欧洲绿色协议》和CAP改革将农林业纳入多功能土地利用系统的后社会主义国家提供了更广泛的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信