Giuseppina Pennisi, Giorgio Gianquinto, Leo F. M. Marcelis, Michael Martin, Francesco Orsini
{"title":"Vertical farming: productivity, environmental impact, and resource use. A review","authors":"Giuseppina Pennisi, Giorgio Gianquinto, Leo F. M. Marcelis, Michael Martin, Francesco Orsini","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01055-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vertical farming is gaining attention as an indoor growing system because it enables standardised and intense production, thanks to fully controlled growing settings where environmental parameters can be precisely tuned to satisfy plants’ needs. While vertical farming is claimed to feature high use efficiencies of land, water, and nutrient resources, its high energy use is behind some recent major bankruptcies and hinders large-scale uptake of the technology. Thus, a critical analysis of the productive, economic, and environmental performances of vertical farming is needed. Here, we review the state of the art of vertical farming, with the aim to provide quantitative data on productivity and environmental performance, with a focus on resource use efficiency, which can also be used for benchmarking. The article elaborates on how vertical farming compares with open-field and greenhouse production of leafy greens (in particular lettuce). Lettuce yield (as fresh weight, FW, per cultivation area) in vertical farms commonly averages 60 to 105 kg FW m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, with energy use efficiency of approximately 0.08–0.13 kg FW kWh<sup>−1</sup>, and water use efficiency of approximately 140 g FW L<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O. The higher greenhouse gas emissions of vertical farming technology systems (on average, 2.9 kg CO<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> FW) as compared with traditional systems are discussed and compared to impacts associated with transport in longer supply chains or those caused by energy-intensive greenhouse technologies that enable cultivation in harsh environments. The potential for consistent production throughout seasons in vertical farming suggests that looking at yearly yield only (rather than their monthly trends) may be misleading when addressing a stable food supply in a specific region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-025-01055-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01055-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vertical farming is gaining attention as an indoor growing system because it enables standardised and intense production, thanks to fully controlled growing settings where environmental parameters can be precisely tuned to satisfy plants’ needs. While vertical farming is claimed to feature high use efficiencies of land, water, and nutrient resources, its high energy use is behind some recent major bankruptcies and hinders large-scale uptake of the technology. Thus, a critical analysis of the productive, economic, and environmental performances of vertical farming is needed. Here, we review the state of the art of vertical farming, with the aim to provide quantitative data on productivity and environmental performance, with a focus on resource use efficiency, which can also be used for benchmarking. The article elaborates on how vertical farming compares with open-field and greenhouse production of leafy greens (in particular lettuce). Lettuce yield (as fresh weight, FW, per cultivation area) in vertical farms commonly averages 60 to 105 kg FW m−2 year−1, with energy use efficiency of approximately 0.08–0.13 kg FW kWh−1, and water use efficiency of approximately 140 g FW L−1 H2O. The higher greenhouse gas emissions of vertical farming technology systems (on average, 2.9 kg CO2 kg−1 FW) as compared with traditional systems are discussed and compared to impacts associated with transport in longer supply chains or those caused by energy-intensive greenhouse technologies that enable cultivation in harsh environments. The potential for consistent production throughout seasons in vertical farming suggests that looking at yearly yield only (rather than their monthly trends) may be misleading when addressing a stable food supply in a specific region.
垂直农业作为一种室内种植系统正受到越来越多的关注,因为它能够实现标准化和集约化生产,这要归功于完全可控的种植环境,环境参数可以精确地调整以满足植物的需求。虽然垂直农业据称具有土地、水和营养资源的高效利用,但其高能耗是最近一些主要破产的原因,并阻碍了该技术的大规模采用。因此,需要对垂直农业的生产、经济和环境表现进行批判性分析。在这里,我们回顾了垂直农业的现状,目的是提供关于生产力和环境绩效的定量数据,重点是资源利用效率,这也可以用于基准测试。这篇文章详细阐述了垂直种植与露天种植和温室种植绿叶蔬菜(尤其是生菜)的比较。垂直农场的生菜产量(以鲜重计,FW,每种植面积)通常平均为60至105 kg FW m−2年−1年,能源利用效率约为0.08-0.13 kg FW kWh−1,水利用效率约为140 g FW L−1 H2O。与传统系统相比,垂直农业技术系统的温室气体排放量更高(平均为2.9 kg CO2 kg - 1 FW),并与较长供应链中运输相关的影响或在恶劣环境中进行种植的能源密集型温室技术造成的影响进行了比较。垂直农业在整个季节中保持一致产量的潜力表明,在解决特定地区稳定的粮食供应问题时,只看年产量(而不是月度趋势)可能会产生误导。
期刊介绍:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences.
ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels.
Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.