Balancing innovation and ethics: promote academic integrity through support and effective use of GenAI tools in higher education

Daniel Kangwa, Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri, Antony Fute
{"title":"Balancing innovation and ethics: promote academic integrity through support and effective use of GenAI tools in higher education","authors":"Daniel Kangwa,&nbsp;Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri,&nbsp;Antony Fute","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00689-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the balance between innovation and ethics in using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in higher education, focusing on the role of institutional guidelines in enhancing academic integrity. It thematically synthesised findings from studies published between 2021 and 2024 to assess the impact of academic support, self-regulation, and institutional regulations on the ethical use of GenAI tools. Results indicate that academic support, like resource availability, training, and technical guidance, are crucial to effectively integrating GenAI tools. Their perceived usefulness and ease of use improve learning outcomes and skill development, particularly in critical thinking and problem-solving. Similarly, self-regulation contributed to maintaining academic integrity, with adaptive learning and personalised feedback playing significant roles. Institutional regulations, including data privacy, bias, and fairness guidelines, also enhance responsible use for academic skills development and prevent academic malpractice. Additionally, while proper training and technical guidance are essential to promote perceived usefulness and ease of use, culturally relevant GenAI tools improve learning engagement. Hence, this study concludes that a comprehensive approach, incorporating academic support, self-regulation, and clear institutional guidelines, harnesses the benefits of GenAI tools while ensuring ethical standards in academic skills development. Thus, adequate academic support and self-regulation are essential for maximising the benefits of GenAI tools in higher education. Indeed, institutions should focus on providing comprehensive training, technical guidance, and culturally relevant tools to enhance student learning and skills development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 4","pages":"3497 - 3530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00689-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the balance between innovation and ethics in using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in higher education, focusing on the role of institutional guidelines in enhancing academic integrity. It thematically synthesised findings from studies published between 2021 and 2024 to assess the impact of academic support, self-regulation, and institutional regulations on the ethical use of GenAI tools. Results indicate that academic support, like resource availability, training, and technical guidance, are crucial to effectively integrating GenAI tools. Their perceived usefulness and ease of use improve learning outcomes and skill development, particularly in critical thinking and problem-solving. Similarly, self-regulation contributed to maintaining academic integrity, with adaptive learning and personalised feedback playing significant roles. Institutional regulations, including data privacy, bias, and fairness guidelines, also enhance responsible use for academic skills development and prevent academic malpractice. Additionally, while proper training and technical guidance are essential to promote perceived usefulness and ease of use, culturally relevant GenAI tools improve learning engagement. Hence, this study concludes that a comprehensive approach, incorporating academic support, self-regulation, and clear institutional guidelines, harnesses the benefits of GenAI tools while ensuring ethical standards in academic skills development. Thus, adequate academic support and self-regulation are essential for maximising the benefits of GenAI tools in higher education. Indeed, institutions should focus on providing comprehensive training, technical guidance, and culturally relevant tools to enhance student learning and skills development.

Abstract Image

平衡创新和道德:通过在高等教育中支持和有效使用GenAI工具来促进学术诚信
本研究探讨了在高等教育中使用生成式人工智能(GenAI)工具的创新与伦理之间的平衡,重点关注了制度指南在加强学术诚信方面的作用。它按主题综合了2021年至2024年间发表的研究结果,以评估学术支持、自我监管和机构监管对基因人工智能工具伦理使用的影响。结果表明,学术支持,如资源可用性、培训和技术指导,对于有效整合GenAI工具至关重要。它们的实用性和易用性提高了学习成果和技能发展,特别是在批判性思维和解决问题方面。同样,自我调节有助于保持学术诚信,适应性学习和个性化反馈发挥了重要作用。机构法规,包括数据隐私、偏见和公平准则,也加强了对学术技能发展的负责任使用,防止学术不端行为。此外,虽然适当的培训和技术指导对于提高感知有用性和易用性至关重要,但与文化相关的GenAI工具可以提高学习参与度。因此,本研究得出结论,一种综合的方法,包括学术支持、自我监管和明确的制度指导方针,可以利用GenAI工具的好处,同时确保学术技能发展的道德标准。因此,充分的学术支持和自我监管对于在高等教育中最大化GenAI工具的好处至关重要。事实上,教育机构应该专注于提供全面的培训、技术指导和与文化相关的工具,以加强学生的学习和技能发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信