Cultivating allyship in academia: towards culturally responsive ethics and methodologies in western agroforestry research

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Hannah L. Hemmelgarn
{"title":"Cultivating allyship in academia: towards culturally responsive ethics and methodologies in western agroforestry research","authors":"Hannah L. Hemmelgarn","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01242-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a practice of integrating perennial agricultural systems with long-term land stewardship, agroforestry is rooted in Indigenous cultural and ecological contexts that extend around the world and through centuries. However, the modern science of agroforestry has largely been conducted within Western and Westernized institutions where researchers, many of them non-Indigenous, are typically trained in ways that contrast with Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies, and that can result in extraction and exploitation of Indigenous knowledges. This reflexive review of relevant research approaches and methodologies considers how non-Native agroforestry scientists can begin to shift away from patterns of exploitation in land-based research, and move instead towards cultivating allyship and cultural humility, ethically centering Indigenous contributions and perspectives. Drawing from ethics guidelines, community-based and participatory action research methodologies, Indigenous methodologies, and intercultural case studies, and written from my perspective as a non-Native academic in agroforestry in the United States, this paper contributes to the limited literature on methodological praxis as allyship in land-based research, towards elucidating approaches that can create new patterns of respect, responsibility, and relational accountability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01242-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01242-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a practice of integrating perennial agricultural systems with long-term land stewardship, agroforestry is rooted in Indigenous cultural and ecological contexts that extend around the world and through centuries. However, the modern science of agroforestry has largely been conducted within Western and Westernized institutions where researchers, many of them non-Indigenous, are typically trained in ways that contrast with Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies, and that can result in extraction and exploitation of Indigenous knowledges. This reflexive review of relevant research approaches and methodologies considers how non-Native agroforestry scientists can begin to shift away from patterns of exploitation in land-based research, and move instead towards cultivating allyship and cultural humility, ethically centering Indigenous contributions and perspectives. Drawing from ethics guidelines, community-based and participatory action research methodologies, Indigenous methodologies, and intercultural case studies, and written from my perspective as a non-Native academic in agroforestry in the United States, this paper contributes to the limited literature on methodological praxis as allyship in land-based research, towards elucidating approaches that can create new patterns of respect, responsibility, and relational accountability.

培养学术界的盟友关系:西方农林业研究中的文化响应伦理和方法
作为一种将多年生农业系统与长期土地管理相结合的做法,农林业植根于世界各地数百年来的土著文化和生态背景。然而,现代农林业科学在很大程度上是在西方和西方化的机构中进行的,在这些机构中,研究人员(其中许多是非土著)通常以与土著本体论和认识论相反的方式接受培训,这可能导致对土著知识的提取和利用。这篇对相关研究方法和方法的反思性综述考虑了非土著农林业科学家如何开始从陆地研究中的剥削模式转变为培养盟友关系和文化谦逊,在伦理上以土著的贡献和观点为中心。本文借鉴了伦理准则、社区和参与性行动研究方法、土著方法和跨文化案例研究,并从我作为美国农林业非土著学者的角度出发,对陆地研究中方法论实践的有限文献做出了贡献,阐明了可以创造尊重、责任和关系问责新模式的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信