Combining participatory and modeling approaches to investigate factors and drivers of soil erosion risk in mixed crop-livestock farms

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Martina Re, Stefano De Leo, Martina Occelli, Heitor Mancini Teixeira, Marcello Mele, Sara Burbi, Paolo Bàrberi, Alberto Mantino
{"title":"Combining participatory and modeling approaches to investigate factors and drivers of soil erosion risk in mixed crop-livestock farms","authors":"Martina Re,&nbsp;Stefano De Leo,&nbsp;Martina Occelli,&nbsp;Heitor Mancini Teixeira,&nbsp;Marcello Mele,&nbsp;Sara Burbi,&nbsp;Paolo Bàrberi,&nbsp;Alberto Mantino","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01036-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil erosion threatens mixed farms in marginal areas, endangering their cultural and economic role in territories where pastoralist systems are already under pressure for climatic, socioeconomic, and generational factors. The rise in extreme rainfall events worsens soil loss on farmland, underscoring the need to co-develop practices that boost climate resilience in agriculture. This study helps fill the gap in understanding how the integration of farmers’ perceptions with spatial modeling can inform land management strategies. We combined farmers’ perceptions, model predictions, and farm management to provide an integrated assessment of the soil erosion. We represented the geographical distribution of soil erosion risk through geographical information systems-based RUSLE modeling. Farmers’ perceptions on soil erosion were assessed through surveys and fuzzy cognitive mapping conducted across 25 sheep farms. Our model shows that 37% of cropland is at risk, mainly due to land topography and soil cover. Fuzzy cognitive maps reveal that farmers are aware of the main environmental and human-linked soil erosion drivers. Farmers recognize cropping system design, especially using perennial forage instead of annual crops, as key to reducing soil erosion, and also see temporary ditches, reduced tillage, and agroforestry as effective measures. Utilizing a multivariate ordinal logistic regression, we showed that sheep farmers with a higher education level tend to perceive higher soil erosion risk. The number of conservation measures adopted increases when farmers are more aware of soil erosion issues, when they identify a higher number of fuzzy cognitive map connections, and when the predicted soil erosion risk is higher. Farmers’ perceptions of erosion risks and soil conservation measures aligned with model predictions on soil erosion, highlighting the importance of systematically involving farmers in research and policy design. Their detailed mental models enhance environmental models and should be considered in the European Common Agricultural Policy for sustainable rural development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-025-01036-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01036-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil erosion threatens mixed farms in marginal areas, endangering their cultural and economic role in territories where pastoralist systems are already under pressure for climatic, socioeconomic, and generational factors. The rise in extreme rainfall events worsens soil loss on farmland, underscoring the need to co-develop practices that boost climate resilience in agriculture. This study helps fill the gap in understanding how the integration of farmers’ perceptions with spatial modeling can inform land management strategies. We combined farmers’ perceptions, model predictions, and farm management to provide an integrated assessment of the soil erosion. We represented the geographical distribution of soil erosion risk through geographical information systems-based RUSLE modeling. Farmers’ perceptions on soil erosion were assessed through surveys and fuzzy cognitive mapping conducted across 25 sheep farms. Our model shows that 37% of cropland is at risk, mainly due to land topography and soil cover. Fuzzy cognitive maps reveal that farmers are aware of the main environmental and human-linked soil erosion drivers. Farmers recognize cropping system design, especially using perennial forage instead of annual crops, as key to reducing soil erosion, and also see temporary ditches, reduced tillage, and agroforestry as effective measures. Utilizing a multivariate ordinal logistic regression, we showed that sheep farmers with a higher education level tend to perceive higher soil erosion risk. The number of conservation measures adopted increases when farmers are more aware of soil erosion issues, when they identify a higher number of fuzzy cognitive map connections, and when the predicted soil erosion risk is higher. Farmers’ perceptions of erosion risks and soil conservation measures aligned with model predictions on soil erosion, highlighting the importance of systematically involving farmers in research and policy design. Their detailed mental models enhance environmental models and should be considered in the European Common Agricultural Policy for sustainable rural development.

结合参与式和建模方法研究农牧混合农场土壤侵蚀风险的因素和驱动因素
土壤侵蚀威胁着边缘地区的混合农场,危及其在放牧系统已经受到气候、社会经济和代际因素压力的地区的文化和经济作用。极端降雨事件的增加加剧了农田的土壤流失,凸显了共同开发提高农业气候适应能力的做法的必要性。这项研究有助于填补理解农民感知与空间建模的整合如何为土地管理策略提供信息的空白。我们将农民的看法、模型预测和农场管理结合起来,提供了对土壤侵蚀的综合评估。通过基于地理信息系统的RUSLE模型表征土壤侵蚀风险的地理分布。农民对土壤侵蚀的看法通过调查和模糊认知地图在25个绵羊农场进行评估。我们的模型显示,37%的农田处于危险之中,主要是由于土地地形和土壤覆盖。模糊认知地图显示,农民意识到主要的环境和人为土壤侵蚀驱动因素。农民认识到耕作制度的设计,特别是使用多年生牧草代替一年生作物,是减少土壤侵蚀的关键,他们还认为临时沟渠、减少耕作和农林业是有效的措施。利用多元有序逻辑回归分析发现,受教育程度越高的牧羊户土壤侵蚀风险越高。当农民对土壤侵蚀问题的认识程度越高、识别出的模糊认知图连接数越多、预测的土壤侵蚀风险越高时,采取的保护措施就越多。农民对侵蚀风险和土壤保持措施的看法与模型对土壤侵蚀的预测一致,突出了系统地让农民参与研究和政策设计的重要性。他们详细的思维模式加强了环境模式,应在促进可持续农村发展的欧洲共同农业政策中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信