{"title":"Quantum attacks on Sum of Even-Mansour construction utilizing online classical queries","authors":"Zhenqiang Li, Shuqin Fan, Fei Gao, Yonglin Hao, Hongwei Sun, Xichao Hu, Dandan Li","doi":"10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00374-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Sum of Even-Mansour (<span>SoEM</span>) construction, proposed by Chen et al. at Crypto 2019, has become the basis for designing some symmetric schemes, such as the nonce-based MAC scheme <span>\\(\\text{nEHtM}_{p}\\)</span> and the nonce-based encryption scheme CENCPP<sup>∗</sup>. In this paper, we make the first attempt to study the quantum security of <span>SoEM</span> under the Q1 model where the targeted encryption oracle can only respond to classical queries rather than quantum ones. Firstly, we propose a quantum key recovery attack on <span>SoEM21</span> with a time complexity of <span>\\(\\tilde{O}(2^{n/3})\\)</span> along with <span>\\(O(2^{n/3})\\)</span> online classical queries. Compared with the current best classical result which requires <span>\\(O(2^{2n/3})\\)</span> time, our method offers a quadratic time speedup while maintaining the same number of queries. The time complexity of our attack is less than that observed for quantum exhaustive search by a factor of <span>\\(2^{n/6}\\)</span>. We further propose classical and quantum key recovery attacks on the generalized <span>SoEM</span><i>s</i>1 construction (consisting of <span>\\(s\\geq 2\\)</span> independent public permutations), revealing that the application of quantum algorithms can provide a quadratic acceleration over the pure classical methods. Our results also imply that the quantum security of <span>SoEM21</span> cannot be strengthened merely by increasing the number of permutations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":547,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Quantum Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://epjquantumtechnology.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00374-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Quantum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00374-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Sum of Even-Mansour (SoEM) construction, proposed by Chen et al. at Crypto 2019, has become the basis for designing some symmetric schemes, such as the nonce-based MAC scheme \(\text{nEHtM}_{p}\) and the nonce-based encryption scheme CENCPP∗. In this paper, we make the first attempt to study the quantum security of SoEM under the Q1 model where the targeted encryption oracle can only respond to classical queries rather than quantum ones. Firstly, we propose a quantum key recovery attack on SoEM21 with a time complexity of \(\tilde{O}(2^{n/3})\) along with \(O(2^{n/3})\) online classical queries. Compared with the current best classical result which requires \(O(2^{2n/3})\) time, our method offers a quadratic time speedup while maintaining the same number of queries. The time complexity of our attack is less than that observed for quantum exhaustive search by a factor of \(2^{n/6}\). We further propose classical and quantum key recovery attacks on the generalized SoEMs1 construction (consisting of \(s\geq 2\) independent public permutations), revealing that the application of quantum algorithms can provide a quadratic acceleration over the pure classical methods. Our results also imply that the quantum security of SoEM21 cannot be strengthened merely by increasing the number of permutations.
期刊介绍:
Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics.
EPJ Quantum Technology covers theoretical and experimental advances in subjects including but not limited to the following:
Quantum measurement, metrology and lithography
Quantum complex systems, networks and cellular automata
Quantum electromechanical systems
Quantum optomechanical systems
Quantum machines, engineering and nanorobotics
Quantum control theory
Quantum information, communication and computation
Quantum thermodynamics
Quantum metamaterials
The effect of Casimir forces on micro- and nano-electromechanical systems
Quantum biology
Quantum sensing
Hybrid quantum systems
Quantum simulations.