AI in power systems: a systematic review of key matters of concern

Q2 Energy
Felipe Henao, Robert Edgell, Ambar Sharma, Jeffrey Olney
{"title":"AI in power systems: a systematic review of key matters of concern","authors":"Felipe Henao,&nbsp;Robert Edgell,&nbsp;Ambar Sharma,&nbsp;Jeffrey Olney","doi":"10.1186/s42162-025-00529-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have generated both excitement and concern within the power sector. While AI holds significant promise, enabling improved forecasting of renewable energy generation, enhanced grid resilience, and better supply-demand balancing, it also raises critical issues around transparency, data privacy, accountability, and fairness in power distribution. Despite the growing body of research on AI applications in power systems, there is a lack of structured understanding of the key socio-technical matters of concern (MCs) surrounding its integration. This paper addresses this gap by conducting a <i>systematic literature review combined with qualitative text analysis</i> to identify and synthesize the most prominent socio-technical concerns in the academic discourse. We analyzed a curated sample of peer-reviewed papers published between 1987 and 2024, focusing on high-impact journals in the field. Our analysis reveals four major categories of concern: (1) <i>Operational Concerns</i>-relating to AI’s reliability, efficiency, and integration with existing grid systems; (2) <i>Sustainability Concerns</i>-centered on energy consumption, environmental impact, and AI’s role in the energy transition; (3) <i>Trust Concerns</i>-including transparency, explainability, cybersecurity, and ethics; and (4) <i>Regulatory and Economic Concerns</i>-covering issues of accountability, regulatory compliance, and cost-effectiveness. By mapping these concerns into a cohesive analytical framework, this study contributes to the literature by offering a clearer understanding of AI’s sociotechnical challenges in the power sector. The framework also informs future research and policymaking efforts aimed at the responsible and sustainable deployment of AI in power systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":538,"journal":{"name":"Energy Informatics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s42162-025-00529-1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42162-025-00529-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have generated both excitement and concern within the power sector. While AI holds significant promise, enabling improved forecasting of renewable energy generation, enhanced grid resilience, and better supply-demand balancing, it also raises critical issues around transparency, data privacy, accountability, and fairness in power distribution. Despite the growing body of research on AI applications in power systems, there is a lack of structured understanding of the key socio-technical matters of concern (MCs) surrounding its integration. This paper addresses this gap by conducting a systematic literature review combined with qualitative text analysis to identify and synthesize the most prominent socio-technical concerns in the academic discourse. We analyzed a curated sample of peer-reviewed papers published between 1987 and 2024, focusing on high-impact journals in the field. Our analysis reveals four major categories of concern: (1) Operational Concerns-relating to AI’s reliability, efficiency, and integration with existing grid systems; (2) Sustainability Concerns-centered on energy consumption, environmental impact, and AI’s role in the energy transition; (3) Trust Concerns-including transparency, explainability, cybersecurity, and ethics; and (4) Regulatory and Economic Concerns-covering issues of accountability, regulatory compliance, and cost-effectiveness. By mapping these concerns into a cohesive analytical framework, this study contributes to the literature by offering a clearer understanding of AI’s sociotechnical challenges in the power sector. The framework also informs future research and policymaking efforts aimed at the responsible and sustainable deployment of AI in power systems.

电力系统中的人工智能:对关键问题的系统回顾
人工智能(AI)的最新进展在电力行业引起了兴奋和担忧。虽然人工智能具有重大前景,可以改善可再生能源发电的预测,增强电网弹性,更好地实现供需平衡,但它也提出了透明度、数据隐私、问责制和配电公平等关键问题。尽管关于人工智能在电力系统中的应用的研究越来越多,但围绕其集成的关键社会技术问题(MCs)缺乏结构化的理解。本文通过进行系统的文献综述,结合定性文本分析来识别和综合学术话语中最突出的社会技术问题,从而解决了这一差距。我们分析了1987年至2024年间发表的经过同行评审的论文样本,重点关注该领域的高影响力期刊。我们的分析揭示了四个主要的问题类别:(1)操作问题——与人工智能的可靠性、效率和与现有电网系统的集成有关;(2)可持续性关注——以能源消耗、环境影响和人工智能在能源转型中的作用为中心;(3)信任问题——包括透明度、可解释性、网络安全和道德;(4)监管和经济问题——涵盖问责制、监管合规和成本效益等问题。通过将这些问题映射到一个有凝聚力的分析框架中,本研究通过更清晰地理解人工智能在电力部门面临的社会技术挑战,为文献做出了贡献。该框架还为未来的研究和政策制定工作提供信息,旨在负责任和可持续地在电力系统中部署人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Informatics
Energy Informatics Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信