Goat supplementation in dry tropical agroforestry: assessment of methodologies for estimation of nutrient intake

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Valdi de Lima Júnior, Divan Soares da Silva, Carlo Aldrovandi Torreão Marques, Jacira Neves da Costa Torreão, Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel, Tairon Pannunzio Dias-Silva, Ângela Maria Vieira Batista, Ariosvaldo Nunes de Medeiros
{"title":"Goat supplementation in dry tropical agroforestry: assessment of methodologies for estimation of nutrient intake","authors":"Valdi de Lima Júnior,&nbsp;Divan Soares da Silva,&nbsp;Carlo Aldrovandi Torreão Marques,&nbsp;Jacira Neves da Costa Torreão,&nbsp;Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel,&nbsp;Tairon Pannunzio Dias-Silva,&nbsp;Ângela Maria Vieira Batista,&nbsp;Ariosvaldo Nunes de Medeiros","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01269-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forage intake by grazing ruminants cannot be measured directly, which requires specific methodologies for its estimation, that generally involve the use of markers. The purpose of this study was to test methodologies for estimating dry matter intake (DMI) in supplemented grazing goats in dry tropical agroforestry (Caatinga). It was used eight esophagus-fistulated animals grazing in the semi-arid region, and receiving concentrate-based supplementation (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% based on body weight, BW). The methods used to estimate intake were: ingestive behavior (IB), in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and indigestible acid detergent fiber (iADF). The data was subjected to joint analysis of variance, analysis of variance and regression (regression analysis only for the effect of supplementation). The average DMI values obtained using the estimation methods were subjected to mean comparison tests. The estimates of total DMI in relation to BW using IB, IVDMD and iADF methods were 1.47, 3.21 and 2.96% of BW, respectively. Forage intake obtained through IB and IVDMD methods was not affected by the increase in supplementation levels, showing average values of 143.5 and 513.6 g DM/day, respectively. Method IB underestimated DMI in comparison to IVDMD. in vitro dry matter digestibility and indigestible acid detergent fiber methods are suitable for estimating DM intake of goats in dry tropical agroforestry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01269-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forage intake by grazing ruminants cannot be measured directly, which requires specific methodologies for its estimation, that generally involve the use of markers. The purpose of this study was to test methodologies for estimating dry matter intake (DMI) in supplemented grazing goats in dry tropical agroforestry (Caatinga). It was used eight esophagus-fistulated animals grazing in the semi-arid region, and receiving concentrate-based supplementation (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% based on body weight, BW). The methods used to estimate intake were: ingestive behavior (IB), in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and indigestible acid detergent fiber (iADF). The data was subjected to joint analysis of variance, analysis of variance and regression (regression analysis only for the effect of supplementation). The average DMI values obtained using the estimation methods were subjected to mean comparison tests. The estimates of total DMI in relation to BW using IB, IVDMD and iADF methods were 1.47, 3.21 and 2.96% of BW, respectively. Forage intake obtained through IB and IVDMD methods was not affected by the increase in supplementation levels, showing average values of 143.5 and 513.6 g DM/day, respectively. Method IB underestimated DMI in comparison to IVDMD. in vitro dry matter digestibility and indigestible acid detergent fiber methods are suitable for estimating DM intake of goats in dry tropical agroforestry.

干燥热带农林业中山羊的补充:营养摄入量估算方法的评估
放牧反刍动物的采食量不能直接测量,这需要具体的估算方法,通常涉及使用标记。本研究的目的是试验估算热带干旱区农林业(Caatinga)补饲山羊干物质采食量(DMI)的方法。试验选用半干旱区放牧的8只食管瘘动物,分别按体重(BW)添加0、0.5、1.0和1.5%的精料。采食量的估算方法为:摄食行为(IB)、体外干物质消化率(IVDMD)和不消化酸性洗涤纤维(iADF)。对数据进行联合方差分析、方差分析和回归分析(仅对补充效果进行回归分析)。用估计方法得到的平均DMI值进行均值比较检验。使用IB、IVDMD和iADF方法估计的总DMI与体重的关系分别为1.47%、3.21%和2.96%。IB法和IVDMD法采食量不受饲粮添加水平的影响,平均采食量分别为143.5和513.6 g DM/d。方法与IVDMD相比,IB低估了DMI。体外干物质消化率法和不消化酸性洗涤纤维法适用于估算热带干燥农林业山羊的干物质采食量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信