Intervention fidelity and behaviour change mechanisms in a health promotion intervention for women following gestational diabetes mellitus: Secondary analysis of the Face-it RCT.
Nanna Husted Jensen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sharleen O'Reilly, Helle Terkildsen Maindal
{"title":"Intervention fidelity and behaviour change mechanisms in a health promotion intervention for women following gestational diabetes mellitus: Secondary analysis of the Face-it RCT.","authors":"Nanna Husted Jensen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sharleen O'Reilly, Helle Terkildsen Maindal","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We evaluated the fidelity of the Face-it intervention and its impact on behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised controlled trial, 277 women were allocated to usual care or an intervention comprising three home visits, digital platform health coaching and cross-sectoral communication to support health behaviour change during the first year after delivery. Behaviour change mechanisms included social support, motivation, self-efficacy, risk perception and health literacy. High fidelity was defined as completing three home visits and ≥ 9 coaching contacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the intervention group, 86.4 % completed ≥ 2 home visits, 88.6 % registered digitally with a median (IQR) of 10.0 (3.0-20.0) contacts. At one-year after delivery, the high-fidelity group (n = 73; 39.7 %) had higher odds of perceiving moderate/high diabetes risk (OR 2.42; 95 % CI 1.06-5.51) and higher health literacy (adjusted difference 0.20; 95 % CI 0.04-0.35), whereas no difference was found for social support, motivation and self-efficacy compared with usual care. No difference was observed between the low fidelity and the usual care group in behaviour change mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Face-it intervention achieved acceptable fidelity. High fidelity appears essential for improving risk perception, health literacy and supporting behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: We evaluated the fidelity of the Face-it intervention and its impact on behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 277 women were allocated to usual care or an intervention comprising three home visits, digital platform health coaching and cross-sectoral communication to support health behaviour change during the first year after delivery. Behaviour change mechanisms included social support, motivation, self-efficacy, risk perception and health literacy. High fidelity was defined as completing three home visits and ≥ 9 coaching contacts.
Results: Within the intervention group, 86.4 % completed ≥ 2 home visits, 88.6 % registered digitally with a median (IQR) of 10.0 (3.0-20.0) contacts. At one-year after delivery, the high-fidelity group (n = 73; 39.7 %) had higher odds of perceiving moderate/high diabetes risk (OR 2.42; 95 % CI 1.06-5.51) and higher health literacy (adjusted difference 0.20; 95 % CI 0.04-0.35), whereas no difference was found for social support, motivation and self-efficacy compared with usual care. No difference was observed between the low fidelity and the usual care group in behaviour change mechanisms.
Conclusions: The Face-it intervention achieved acceptable fidelity. High fidelity appears essential for improving risk perception, health literacy and supporting behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent GDM.