[Appropriateness of Emergency Department Transfers of Nursing Home Residents: Concordance Between Geriatrician and Emergency Physician Assessment in a Retrospective Study].

IF 0.3
Abrar-Ahmad Zulfiqar, Adrien De Oliveira
{"title":"[Appropriateness of Emergency Department Transfers of Nursing Home Residents: Concordance Between Geriatrician and Emergency Physician Assessment in a Retrospective Study].","authors":"Abrar-Ahmad Zulfiqar, Adrien De Oliveira","doi":"10.1684/pnv.2025.1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency department (ED) visits are frequent among nursing home residents, with one in four admitted at least once a year and one in ten admitted at least twice. The main objective of this study was to analyze ED visits by nursing home residents and to assess the concordance between the opinions of a geriatrician and an emergency physician This was a monocentric, retrospective, descriptive study conducted at the Rouen University Hospital ED. All elderly patients referred from nursing homes between January 1 and March 31, 2018, were included. The mean age of patients was 87.6 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.08. A Charlson comorbidity index >6 was found in 73% of cases, and only three medical records mentioned advance directives. Polypharmacy (≥7 medications) was present in 34% of cases, and dementia in 70%. The most common reason for ED referral was cardio-respiratory failure. The mean length of stay in the ED exceeded seven hours. Concordance analysis showed almost perfect agreement between geriatricians and emergency physicians, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.84. Overall, 68% of visits were deemed appropriate, 26.4% inappropriate, and 5.6% indeterminate. Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups regarding the FRENCH triage scale (p<0.01). Patients whose transfer was judged appropriate were significantly more likely to present with pain (p<0.01). The implementation of a relevance score could improve the evaluation of nursing home resident transfers to the ED, a decision that carries significant clinical consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":520632,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrie et psychologie neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement","volume":"23 3","pages":"340-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrie et psychologie neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2025.1241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) visits are frequent among nursing home residents, with one in four admitted at least once a year and one in ten admitted at least twice. The main objective of this study was to analyze ED visits by nursing home residents and to assess the concordance between the opinions of a geriatrician and an emergency physician This was a monocentric, retrospective, descriptive study conducted at the Rouen University Hospital ED. All elderly patients referred from nursing homes between January 1 and March 31, 2018, were included. The mean age of patients was 87.6 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.08. A Charlson comorbidity index >6 was found in 73% of cases, and only three medical records mentioned advance directives. Polypharmacy (≥7 medications) was present in 34% of cases, and dementia in 70%. The most common reason for ED referral was cardio-respiratory failure. The mean length of stay in the ED exceeded seven hours. Concordance analysis showed almost perfect agreement between geriatricians and emergency physicians, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.84. Overall, 68% of visits were deemed appropriate, 26.4% inappropriate, and 5.6% indeterminate. Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups regarding the FRENCH triage scale (p<0.01). Patients whose transfer was judged appropriate were significantly more likely to present with pain (p<0.01). The implementation of a relevance score could improve the evaluation of nursing home resident transfers to the ED, a decision that carries significant clinical consequences.

[疗养院居民急诊科转院的适宜性:一项回顾性研究中老年病专家和急诊医生评估的一致性]。
急诊科(ED)访问频繁的疗养院居民,四分之一的入院至少一年一次,十分之一的入院至少两次。本研究的主要目的是分析疗养院居民的急诊科就诊情况,并评估老年病专家和急诊医生意见之间的一致性。这是一项在鲁昂大学医院急诊科进行的单中心、回顾性、描述性研究。2018年1月1日至3月31日期间从疗养院转诊的所有老年患者都被纳入其中。患者平均年龄87.6岁,男女比2.08。在73%的病例中发现Charlson合并症指数bb60,只有3份医疗记录提到了预先指示。34%的病例存在多重用药(≥7种药物),70%的病例存在痴呆。转到急诊科的最常见原因是心肺衰竭。在急诊科的平均停留时间超过7小时。一致性分析显示,老年病医生和急诊医生之间几乎完全一致,科恩卡帕系数为0.84。总体而言,68%的访问被认为是适当的,26.4%的访问被认为是不适当的,5.6%的访问不确定。卡方分析显示两组在法国分诊量表上有显著差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书