Do we need internal medicine specialists in physical therapy? Recognizing the need for updating the clinical practice paradigm.

IF 1.9 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1656054
Mansour M Alotaibi
{"title":"Do we need internal medicine specialists in physical therapy? Recognizing the need for updating the clinical practice paradigm.","authors":"Mansour M Alotaibi","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1656054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growing demand for healthcare services and development of healthcare present an opportunity for expanding physical therapy roles into internal medicine. This perspective discusses the potential benefits and limitations of establishing a formal internal medicine specialization for physical therapists (PTs). While PTs already contribute significantly to chronic disease prevention and treatment, their current scope of practice lacks structured training in internal medicine domains such as metabolic, autoimmune, renal, and systemic inflammatory disorders. Integrating internal medicine into PT education and clinical practice could enhance early identification of red flags, embrace interdisciplinary collaboration, and improve non-pharmacological interventions for various internal medicine-related diseases. Nevertheless, this expansion must be approached with caution, ensuring clear scope definitions, adequate training, and collaborative implementation to mitigate risks such as role ambiguity or misdiagnosis. Drawing on global experiences from advanced practice models and emerging literature, this paper calls for a discussion on the feasibility, safety, and value of internal medicine specialization in physical therapy practice. The goal of this perspective is not to replace medical professionals but to augment chronic disease management through targeted evidence-based rehabilitation strategies and preventative approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1656054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1656054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for healthcare services and development of healthcare present an opportunity for expanding physical therapy roles into internal medicine. This perspective discusses the potential benefits and limitations of establishing a formal internal medicine specialization for physical therapists (PTs). While PTs already contribute significantly to chronic disease prevention and treatment, their current scope of practice lacks structured training in internal medicine domains such as metabolic, autoimmune, renal, and systemic inflammatory disorders. Integrating internal medicine into PT education and clinical practice could enhance early identification of red flags, embrace interdisciplinary collaboration, and improve non-pharmacological interventions for various internal medicine-related diseases. Nevertheless, this expansion must be approached with caution, ensuring clear scope definitions, adequate training, and collaborative implementation to mitigate risks such as role ambiguity or misdiagnosis. Drawing on global experiences from advanced practice models and emerging literature, this paper calls for a discussion on the feasibility, safety, and value of internal medicine specialization in physical therapy practice. The goal of this perspective is not to replace medical professionals but to augment chronic disease management through targeted evidence-based rehabilitation strategies and preventative approaches.

我们需要内科专家做物理治疗吗?认识到需要更新临床实践范式。
对医疗保健服务的需求不断增长和医疗保健的发展为将物理治疗角色扩展到内科提供了机会。这一观点讨论了为物理治疗师(PTs)建立正式的内科专业的潜在好处和局限性。虽然PTs已经在慢性疾病的预防和治疗方面做出了重大贡献,但他们目前的实践范围缺乏在内科领域的结构化培训,如代谢、自身免疫、肾脏和全身炎症性疾病。将内科医学纳入PT教育和临床实践可以提高早期识别危险信号,拥抱跨学科合作,并改善各种内科相关疾病的非药物干预。然而,这种扩展必须谨慎处理,确保明确的范围定义、充分的培训和协作实现,以减轻诸如角色模糊或误诊等风险。借鉴全球先进的实践模式和新兴文献的经验,本文呼吁讨论内科专业化在物理治疗实践中的可行性、安全性和价值。这种观点的目标不是取代医疗专业人员,而是通过有针对性的循证康复策略和预防方法来增强慢性病管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信