Association of preoperative beta-blocker interruption on postoperative morbidity and mortality: a historical cohort study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Suzanne Flier, J Andrew McClure, Britney Le, Philip M Jones, Kelly Vogt, Marko Mrkobrada, Blayne Welk, Luc Dubois
{"title":"Association of preoperative beta-blocker interruption on postoperative morbidity and mortality: a historical cohort study.","authors":"Suzanne Flier, J Andrew McClure, Britney Le, Philip M Jones, Kelly Vogt, Marko Mrkobrada, Blayne Welk, Luc Dubois","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-03027-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to investigate the impact that patient-initiated beta-blocker interruption on the morning of surgery has on postoperative adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a historical cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical procedures at two hospitals belonging to a single academic institution from 2014 to 2018 in the Canadian province of Ontario. We used electronic medical records to identify the initial cohort and collect patient information, including medication interruption. These data were linked to administrative data holdings, which we used to capture study outcomes, including 30-day and 90-day mortality and a composite outcome representing several adverse events. We used logistic regression to evaluate between-group differences in study outcomes and included a covariate representing propensity for beta-blocker interruption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 4,971 patients, 22.2% of whom experienced a preoperative beta-blocker interruption. As compared with patients who continued their medication, those with a beta-blocker interruption had significantly decreased odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 1.00; P = 0.049) and 90-day mortality (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.90; P = 0.02) in adjusted analyses. Following adjustment, beta-blocker interruption was not significantly associated with any of the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study suggest that preoperative acute beta-blocker interruption is significantly associated with decreased 30-day and 90-day postoperative all-cause mortality. These data challenge the long-held assumption that patients on beta-blockers should continue these medications during the perioperative period and indicate that a proper controlled trial is needed to assess the impact of withholding beta-blockers prior to major surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-03027-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the impact that patient-initiated beta-blocker interruption on the morning of surgery has on postoperative adverse outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical procedures at two hospitals belonging to a single academic institution from 2014 to 2018 in the Canadian province of Ontario. We used electronic medical records to identify the initial cohort and collect patient information, including medication interruption. These data were linked to administrative data holdings, which we used to capture study outcomes, including 30-day and 90-day mortality and a composite outcome representing several adverse events. We used logistic regression to evaluate between-group differences in study outcomes and included a covariate representing propensity for beta-blocker interruption.

Results: The final cohort included 4,971 patients, 22.2% of whom experienced a preoperative beta-blocker interruption. As compared with patients who continued their medication, those with a beta-blocker interruption had significantly decreased odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 1.00; P = 0.049) and 90-day mortality (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.90; P = 0.02) in adjusted analyses. Following adjustment, beta-blocker interruption was not significantly associated with any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Results from this study suggest that preoperative acute beta-blocker interruption is significantly associated with decreased 30-day and 90-day postoperative all-cause mortality. These data challenge the long-held assumption that patients on beta-blockers should continue these medications during the perioperative period and indicate that a proper controlled trial is needed to assess the impact of withholding beta-blockers prior to major surgery.

术前阻断剂中断与术后发病率和死亡率的关系:一项历史队列研究。
目的:我们的目的是调查患者在手术早晨开始的β受体阻滞剂中断对术后不良结局的影响。方法:我们对2014年至2018年在加拿大安大略省同一学术机构的两家医院连续接受选择性外科手术的患者进行了一项历史队列研究。我们使用电子医疗记录来确定初始队列并收集患者信息,包括药物中断。这些数据与管理数据相关联,我们使用这些数据来获取研究结果,包括30天和90天死亡率以及代表几种不良事件的综合结果。我们使用逻辑回归来评估研究结果的组间差异,并纳入了一个协变量,代表β受体阻滞剂中断的倾向。结果:最终的队列包括4,971例患者,其中22.2%的患者术前β受体阻滞剂中断。在校正分析中,与继续用药的患者相比,阻断剂中断患者的30天死亡率(比值比[OR], 0.42; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.18至1.00;P = 0.049)和90天死亡率(比值比[OR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28至0.90;P = 0.02)显著降低。调整后,阻断剂中断与任何次要结局均无显著相关。结论:本研究的结果表明,术前急性阻断剂中断与术后30天和90天全因死亡率的降低显著相关。这些数据挑战了长期以来的假设,即服用-受体阻滞剂的患者应在围手术期继续服用这些药物,并表明需要进行适当的对照试验来评估在大手术前不服用-受体阻滞剂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信