Cost-utility analysis of a web-based interactive patient education platform: evidence from a randomized clinical trial for end-stage renal disease patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Modou Diop, Lionel Perrier, Baptiste Haon, Lise Rochaix, Luc Behaghel, Jean-Claude K Dupont, Magali Morelle, Michelle Elias, Laure Esposito, Christophe Legendre, Hélène Longuet, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Evangéline Pillebout
{"title":"Cost-utility analysis of a web-based interactive patient education platform: evidence from a randomized clinical trial for end-stage renal disease patients.","authors":"Modou Diop, Lionel Perrier, Baptiste Haon, Lise Rochaix, Luc Behaghel, Jean-Claude K Dupont, Magali Morelle, Michelle Elias, Laure Esposito, Christophe Legendre, Hélène Longuet, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Evangéline Pillebout","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01828-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic kidney disease and its most severe complication, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), represents an estimated financial burden of €4.4 billion in 2021 in France. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) improves ESRD management and health outcomes. This study explored whether providing access to an interactive web-based TPE platform with community features was cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A within-trial cost-utility analysis was carried out over an 18 months horizon, using data from the PIC-R (Plateforme Interactive Communautaire-dialyse et transplantation Rénale) trial. ESRD or post-transplant patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a control group with no specific TPE program (Control), an intervention group with online TPE (e-TPE) and an intervention group with online TPE coupled with community features such as a patient forum and a chatroom with both patients and health care professionals (e-TPE + chat). The outcome measure was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and per year of full capability (YFC). Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were conducted, and missing data were handled using multiple imputation and selection models. Sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 815 patients assessed for eligibility across 12 French centres, a total of 549 patients were included in the economic analysis: 186 in the Control group, 189 in the e-TPE group and 174 in the e-TPE + chat group. The e-TPE group demonstrated cost savings and slightly higher QALYs compared to the control group, making e-TPE dominant. Conversely, the e-TPE + chat intervention resulted in higher costs without substantial effectiveness gains, making it not cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>e-TPE was deemed cost-effective for ESRD patients, while e-TPE + chat was not. Web-based platforms improve ESRD management when targeted to likely users.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01828-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease and its most severe complication, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), represents an estimated financial burden of €4.4 billion in 2021 in France. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) improves ESRD management and health outcomes. This study explored whether providing access to an interactive web-based TPE platform with community features was cost-effective.

Methods: A within-trial cost-utility analysis was carried out over an 18 months horizon, using data from the PIC-R (Plateforme Interactive Communautaire-dialyse et transplantation Rénale) trial. ESRD or post-transplant patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a control group with no specific TPE program (Control), an intervention group with online TPE (e-TPE) and an intervention group with online TPE coupled with community features such as a patient forum and a chatroom with both patients and health care professionals (e-TPE + chat). The outcome measure was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and per year of full capability (YFC). Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were conducted, and missing data were handled using multiple imputation and selection models. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Among the 815 patients assessed for eligibility across 12 French centres, a total of 549 patients were included in the economic analysis: 186 in the Control group, 189 in the e-TPE group and 174 in the e-TPE + chat group. The e-TPE group demonstrated cost savings and slightly higher QALYs compared to the control group, making e-TPE dominant. Conversely, the e-TPE + chat intervention resulted in higher costs without substantial effectiveness gains, making it not cost-effective.

Conclusions: e-TPE was deemed cost-effective for ESRD patients, while e-TPE + chat was not. Web-based platforms improve ESRD management when targeted to likely users.

基于网络的交互式患者教育平台的成本效用分析:来自终末期肾病患者随机临床试验的证据
慢性肾病及其最严重的并发症终末期肾病(ESRD)预计在2021年在法国造成44亿欧元的经济负担。治疗性患者教育(TPE)改善ESRD管理和健康结果。本研究探讨了提供具有社区特征的基于网络的交互式TPE平台是否具有成本效益。方法:使用PIC-R (platform - Interactive communauire - dialyysis et transplantation rims)试验的数据,进行为期18个月的试验内成本-效用分析。ESRD或移植后患者以1:1:1的比例随机分为没有特定TPE计划的对照组(control)、在线TPE干预组(e-TPE)和在线TPE结合社区功能(如患者论坛和患者和医疗保健专业人员的聊天室)的干预组(e-TPE + chat)。结果测量为每质量调整生命年(QALY)和每完全功能年(YFC)的成本。进行了意向治疗(ITT)和每个方案(PP)分析,并使用多重输入和选择模型处理缺失数据。进行敏感性分析。结果:在12个法国中心评估的815例患者中,共有549例患者被纳入经济分析:对照组186例,e-TPE组189例,e-TPE +聊天组174例。与对照组相比,e-TPE组显示出成本节约和略高的QALYs,使e-TPE占主导地位。相反,e-TPE + chat干预导致成本更高,但没有实质性的效果提高,因此不具有成本效益。结论:e-TPE被认为对ESRD患者具有成本效益,而e-TPE + chat则不然。当针对潜在用户时,基于web的平台可以改进ESRD管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信