Racial Disparities in Heart Transplantation: Long-Term Graft Survival and Nonmortality Outcomes.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-10-07 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038892
Steven Anthony Hamilton, Brian Wayda, Yingjie Weng, Shiqi Zhang, Kiran K Khush
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Heart Transplantation: Long-Term Graft Survival and Nonmortality Outcomes.","authors":"Steven Anthony Hamilton, Brian Wayda, Yingjie Weng, Shiqi Zhang, Kiran K Khush","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies have reported conflicting evidence on racial disparities in heart transplant outcomes, often focusing only on short-term mortality rates. We assessed longer-term survival and a broader range of post-heart transplant outcomes by race.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed adult heart transplant recipients from 2017 to 2022 in the SRTR (Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients), categorizing race as Black, non-Hispanic White, or Other. The primary outcome was graft failure at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes included acute rejection, renal dysfunction, and posttransplant diabetes. χ<sup>2</sup> tests and Kaplan-Meier/logistic regression analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 15 873 recipients (63% White, 23% Black, 14% Other), Black recipients were more likely female, publicly insured, and less likely to be college educated. They also had higher use of durable ventricular assist devices and intra-aortic balloon pump at transplant. One-year graft survival was similar across groups (91.8% Black versus 91.1% non-Black), but 3-year survival was lower among Black individuals (83.4% versus 85.7%, <i>P</i>=0.006). After adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical factors, Black recipients had a higher risk of graft failure at 3 years (odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.07-1.39]). Black patients also experienced higher rates of acute rejection (12.4% versus 10.2%), diabetes (10.8% versus 7.1%), and renal dysfunction progression (40.9% versus 37.1%) at 3 years (<i>P</i><0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial disparities in heart transplant outcomes persist, particularly in longer-term survival. These disparities may be partially mediated by differences in posttransplant complications such as rejection, renal dysfunction, and diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038892"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior studies have reported conflicting evidence on racial disparities in heart transplant outcomes, often focusing only on short-term mortality rates. We assessed longer-term survival and a broader range of post-heart transplant outcomes by race.

Methods: We analyzed adult heart transplant recipients from 2017 to 2022 in the SRTR (Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients), categorizing race as Black, non-Hispanic White, or Other. The primary outcome was graft failure at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes included acute rejection, renal dysfunction, and posttransplant diabetes. χ2 tests and Kaplan-Meier/logistic regression analyses were used.

Results: Among 15 873 recipients (63% White, 23% Black, 14% Other), Black recipients were more likely female, publicly insured, and less likely to be college educated. They also had higher use of durable ventricular assist devices and intra-aortic balloon pump at transplant. One-year graft survival was similar across groups (91.8% Black versus 91.1% non-Black), but 3-year survival was lower among Black individuals (83.4% versus 85.7%, P=0.006). After adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical factors, Black recipients had a higher risk of graft failure at 3 years (odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.07-1.39]). Black patients also experienced higher rates of acute rejection (12.4% versus 10.2%), diabetes (10.8% versus 7.1%), and renal dysfunction progression (40.9% versus 37.1%) at 3 years (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusions: Racial disparities in heart transplant outcomes persist, particularly in longer-term survival. These disparities may be partially mediated by differences in posttransplant complications such as rejection, renal dysfunction, and diabetes.

心脏移植的种族差异:长期移植物存活和非死亡率结果。
背景:先前的研究报告了关于心脏移植结果的种族差异的相互矛盾的证据,通常只关注短期死亡率。我们根据种族评估了长期生存和更广泛的心脏移植后结果。方法:我们在SRTR(移植受者科学登记处)中分析了2017年至2022年的成人心脏移植受者,将种族分为黑人、非西班牙裔白人或其他种族。1年和3年的主要结局是移植物衰竭。次要结局包括急性排斥反应、肾功能障碍和移植后糖尿病。采用χ2检验和Kaplan-Meier/logistic回归分析。结果:在15873名受助人(63%白人,23%黑人,14%其他)中,黑人受助人更有可能是女性,有公共保险,受过大学教育的可能性更低。他们在移植手术中使用耐用心室辅助装置和主动脉内球囊泵的比例也更高。1年移植物生存率各组相似(黑人91.8% vs非黑人91.1%),但黑人3年生存率较低(83.4% vs 85.7%, P=0.006)。在调整了社会经济和临床因素后,黑人受者在3年的移植失败风险更高(优势比为1.22 [95% CI, 1.07-1.39])。黑人患者在3年的急性排斥反应(12.4%对10.2%)、糖尿病(10.8%对7.1%)和肾功能障碍进展(40.9%对37.1%)的发生率也更高(结论:心脏移植结果的种族差异仍然存在,特别是在长期生存中。这些差异可能部分由移植后并发症的差异介导,如排斥反应、肾功能障碍和糖尿病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信