Machine learning model to predict mortality in patients with skin and soft tissue infection in emergency department.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Yu-Wei Chen, Kai-Hsiang Wu, Po-Han Wu, Cheng-Ting Hsiao, Chiao-Hsuan Hsieh, Wen-Chih Fann, Leng-Chieh Lin, Chia-Peng Chang
{"title":"Machine learning model to predict mortality in patients with skin and soft tissue infection in emergency department.","authors":"Yu-Wei Chen, Kai-Hsiang Wu, Po-Han Wu, Cheng-Ting Hsiao, Chiao-Hsuan Hsieh, Wen-Chih Fann, Leng-Chieh Lin, Chia-Peng Chang","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01463-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately predicting mortality in patients with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) remains challenging. Machine learning models offer rapid processing, algorithmic impartiality, and strong predictive accuracy, which may improve early risk stratification in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,294 ED patients diagnosed with SSTIs between March 2015 and December 2020. Five machine learning algorithms-logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed using 20 candidate variables, with model performance evaluated in independent runs. A simplified XGBoost model using only the six most influential predictors was also derived for bedside application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the five models, XGBoost achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.892, sensitivity = 86.9%, specificity = 93.4%). The streamlined six-variable XGBoost model further improved predictive metrics (AUC = 0.922, sensitivity = 88.5%, specificity = 95.4%), matching or slightly surpassing the full model while reducing data requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XGBoost outperformed LR, KNN, SVM, and RF in predicting SSTI mortality, offering both higher accuracy and operational efficiency. Its sequential tree-building, regularization, and robust handling of missing data enable superior discrimination in tabular clinical datasets. The simplified model, requiring only standard admission variables, provides a fast, cost-effective, and highly accurate tool for early identification of high-risk patients in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01463-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurately predicting mortality in patients with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) remains challenging. Machine learning models offer rapid processing, algorithmic impartiality, and strong predictive accuracy, which may improve early risk stratification in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,294 ED patients diagnosed with SSTIs between March 2015 and December 2020. Five machine learning algorithms-logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed using 20 candidate variables, with model performance evaluated in independent runs. A simplified XGBoost model using only the six most influential predictors was also derived for bedside application.

Results: Among the five models, XGBoost achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.892, sensitivity = 86.9%, specificity = 93.4%). The streamlined six-variable XGBoost model further improved predictive metrics (AUC = 0.922, sensitivity = 88.5%, specificity = 95.4%), matching or slightly surpassing the full model while reducing data requirements.

Conclusions: XGBoost outperformed LR, KNN, SVM, and RF in predicting SSTI mortality, offering both higher accuracy and operational efficiency. Its sequential tree-building, regularization, and robust handling of missing data enable superior discrimination in tabular clinical datasets. The simplified model, requiring only standard admission variables, provides a fast, cost-effective, and highly accurate tool for early identification of high-risk patients in the ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习模型预测急诊科皮肤和软组织感染患者的死亡率。
背景:准确预测皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)患者的死亡率仍然具有挑战性。机器学习模型提供快速处理、算法公正性和很强的预测准确性,这可能会改善急诊科(ED)的早期风险分层。方法:回顾性分析2015年3月至2020年12月期间诊断为SSTIs的1294例ED患者的临床资料。五种机器学习算法——逻辑回归(LR)、k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)——使用20个候选变量开发,并在独立运行中评估模型性能。简化的XGBoost模型仅使用6个最具影响力的预测因子,也被导出用于床边应用。结果:5个模型中,XGBoost的AUC = 0.892,灵敏度= 86.9%,特异性= 93.4%,表现最佳。精简的六变量XGBoost模型进一步提高了预测指标(AUC = 0.922,灵敏度= 88.5%,特异性= 95.4%),在降低数据要求的同时,达到或略高于完整模型。结论:XGBoost在预测SSTI死亡率方面优于LR、KNN、SVM和RF,具有更高的准确性和操作效率。它的顺序树构建、正则化和健壮的缺失数据处理使得在表格临床数据集中具有优越的辨别能力。简化模型只需要标准的入院变量,为早期识别急诊科高危患者提供了一种快速、经济、高精度的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信