Evaluation of Paediatric Nursing Students' Medication Calculation Competence: An Observational Study Using a Gamified Contest.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70295
Pablo Buck Sainz-Rozas, Evelin Balaguer-López, Pablo García-Molina, Pedro García Martínez
{"title":"Evaluation of Paediatric Nursing Students' Medication Calculation Competence: An Observational Study Using a Gamified Contest.","authors":"Pablo Buck Sainz-Rozas, Evelin Balaguer-López, Pablo García-Molina, Pedro García Martínez","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyse the general ability of second-degree nursing students at the -REDACTED- to calculate, prepare, and administer paediatric medication.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study was carried out through a gamified educational innovation project: \"Medication Contest\" following the STROBE statement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included all 224 students enrolled in the second year of nursing. The expert faculty created and validated an ad hoc questionnaire with 30 multiple-choice questions. These responses were analysed to evaluate mathematical, conceptual, and concentration-related competencies. Secondary variables were calculated, and correlations with the total score were examined. All variables were correlated with the final score, and their predictive capacities were analysed. To differentiate competencies, the 50 highest scores were compared to the rest of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 224 participants, 50 qualified for the second phase, with 37 achieving the best results. The median final score was 3/30 (IQR 6.3), differentiating 8.8 and 2.3 (p < 0.001) between those included and not in the top 50. Twenty-three primary variables and all secondary variables significantly correlated with the total score. Mathematical competence was the main predictor variable of the final score (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.609). All secondary variables were discriminatory.</p><p><strong>Public contribution: </strong>The general ability to calculate, prepare, and administer paediatric medication in the 2nd year nursing population is deficient. Mathematical competence is the predictor variable of the final score, identifying an area of intervention and the evaluation on which to intervene.</p><p><strong>Tweetable abstract: </strong>Gamification enhances medication calculation training for nursing students through competitive quizzes and simulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 9","pages":"e70295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To analyse the general ability of second-degree nursing students at the -REDACTED- to calculate, prepare, and administer paediatric medication.

Design: A descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study was carried out through a gamified educational innovation project: "Medication Contest" following the STROBE statement.

Methods: The study included all 224 students enrolled in the second year of nursing. The expert faculty created and validated an ad hoc questionnaire with 30 multiple-choice questions. These responses were analysed to evaluate mathematical, conceptual, and concentration-related competencies. Secondary variables were calculated, and correlations with the total score were examined. All variables were correlated with the final score, and their predictive capacities were analysed. To differentiate competencies, the 50 highest scores were compared to the rest of the participants.

Results: Out of the 224 participants, 50 qualified for the second phase, with 37 achieving the best results. The median final score was 3/30 (IQR 6.3), differentiating 8.8 and 2.3 (p < 0.001) between those included and not in the top 50. Twenty-three primary variables and all secondary variables significantly correlated with the total score. Mathematical competence was the main predictor variable of the final score (R2 = 0.609). All secondary variables were discriminatory.

Public contribution: The general ability to calculate, prepare, and administer paediatric medication in the 2nd year nursing population is deficient. Mathematical competence is the predictor variable of the final score, identifying an area of intervention and the evaluation on which to intervene.

Tweetable abstract: Gamification enhances medication calculation training for nursing students through competitive quizzes and simulations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿科护生用药计算能力评价:游戏化竞赛观察性研究。
目的:分析二年级护生计算、准备和给药儿科药物的一般能力。设计:根据STROBE声明,通过游戏化教育创新项目“药物竞赛”进行描述性、分析性和横断面研究。方法:研究对象为224名护理二年级学生。专家团队创建并验证了一份包含30道选择题的临时问卷。对这些回答进行分析,以评估数学、概念和与注意力相关的能力。计算次要变量,并检验与总分的相关性。所有变量均与最终得分相关,并分析其预测能力。为了区分能力,将得分最高的50名与其他参与者进行比较。结果:在224名参与者中,有50人进入第二阶段,其中37人达到最佳效果。最终中位评分为3/30 (IQR 6.3),分8.8分和2.3分(p 2 = 0.609)。所有次要变量均具有歧视性。公众贡献:一般能力计算,准备和管理儿科药物的第二年护理人口是不足的。数学能力是最终得分的预测变量,确定干预的领域和干预的评估。摘要:通过竞争性测验和模拟,游戏化增强了护理学生的药物计算训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信