Using Machine Learning to Identify Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Dialysis Facility Outcomes Across the United States.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ziad M Ashkar, Raju Gottumukkala
{"title":"Using Machine Learning to Identify Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Dialysis Facility Outcomes Across the United States.","authors":"Ziad M Ashkar, Raju Gottumukkala","doi":"10.31486/toj.25.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite progress in dialysis care, the patient outcomes of mortality, hospitalization, and readmission rates remain unsatisfactory because of complex clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic interactions. For this study, we used unsupervised machine learning to identify clusters of dialysis facilities based on quality metrics and sociodemographic factors, with attention to racial and geographic disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sourced facility-level data from data.cms.gov and sourced ZIP Code Tabulation Area-level sociodemographic data from the 2021 American Community Survey via the US Census Bureau application programming interface. Datasets were linked by ZIP code, standardized, and analyzed using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. We examined geographic patterns by US Census Bureau regions. Analyses were conducted in Python version 3.11.6 (Python Software Foundation) with the following libraries: pandas for data manipulation, scikit-learn for machine learning and principal component analysis, Matplotlib and Seaborn for data visualization, and GeoPandas for geographic mapping and spatial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two facility clusters emerged: Cluster 0 (n=4,609) and Cluster 1 (n=2,857). Cluster 1 was characterized by poorer outcomes (higher mortality, hospitalization, readmission, anemia, catheter use, and hyperphosphatemia); lower rates of fistula use; and lower dialysis adequacy compared to Cluster 0. Cluster 1 facilities were more prevalent in regions with lower income, higher unemployment, and lower college education, and they served populations with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic residents. Geographically, Cluster 1 facilities were concentrated in the southern and western United States. Compared to Cluster 0, a larger share of Cluster 1 facilities were for-profit facilities (91.4% vs 88.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a distinct cluster of underperforming dialysis clinics serving socioeconomically disadvantaged and racially diverse populations. Addressing these disparities requires multifaceted strategies including patient-level, institutional, and policy-level interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"25 3","pages":"170-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.25.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite progress in dialysis care, the patient outcomes of mortality, hospitalization, and readmission rates remain unsatisfactory because of complex clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic interactions. For this study, we used unsupervised machine learning to identify clusters of dialysis facilities based on quality metrics and sociodemographic factors, with attention to racial and geographic disparities.

Methods: We sourced facility-level data from data.cms.gov and sourced ZIP Code Tabulation Area-level sociodemographic data from the 2021 American Community Survey via the US Census Bureau application programming interface. Datasets were linked by ZIP code, standardized, and analyzed using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. We examined geographic patterns by US Census Bureau regions. Analyses were conducted in Python version 3.11.6 (Python Software Foundation) with the following libraries: pandas for data manipulation, scikit-learn for machine learning and principal component analysis, Matplotlib and Seaborn for data visualization, and GeoPandas for geographic mapping and spatial analysis.

Results: Two facility clusters emerged: Cluster 0 (n=4,609) and Cluster 1 (n=2,857). Cluster 1 was characterized by poorer outcomes (higher mortality, hospitalization, readmission, anemia, catheter use, and hyperphosphatemia); lower rates of fistula use; and lower dialysis adequacy compared to Cluster 0. Cluster 1 facilities were more prevalent in regions with lower income, higher unemployment, and lower college education, and they served populations with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic residents. Geographically, Cluster 1 facilities were concentrated in the southern and western United States. Compared to Cluster 0, a larger share of Cluster 1 facilities were for-profit facilities (91.4% vs 88.5%).

Conclusion: This study highlights a distinct cluster of underperforming dialysis clinics serving socioeconomically disadvantaged and racially diverse populations. Addressing these disparities requires multifaceted strategies including patient-level, institutional, and policy-level interventions.

使用机器学习识别美国透析设施结果的地理和社会经济差异。
背景:尽管透析护理取得了进展,但由于复杂的临床、人口统计学和社会经济相互作用,患者死亡率、住院率和再入院率的结果仍然令人不满意。在这项研究中,我们使用无监督机器学习来识别基于质量指标和社会人口因素的透析设施集群,并注意种族和地理差异。方法:我们从data.cms.gov获取设施级数据,并通过美国人口普查局应用程序编程接口从2021年美国社区调查中获取邮政编码制表区域级社会人口统计数据。数据集通过邮政编码链接,标准化,并使用主成分分析和k-means聚类进行分析。我们根据美国人口普查局的区域研究了地理模式。使用Python 3.11.6版本(Python Software Foundation)进行分析,使用以下库:pandas用于数据处理,scikit-learn用于机器学习和主成分分析,Matplotlib和Seaborn用于数据可视化,GeoPandas用于地理制图和空间分析。结果:出现了两个设施集群:集群0 (n= 4609)和集群1 (n= 2857)。第1组的特点是预后较差(高死亡率、住院、再入院、贫血、导管使用和高磷血症);瘘管使用率较低;透析充分性较低。集群1设施在收入较低、失业率较高、大学教育程度较低的地区更为普遍,它们为黑人和西班牙裔居民提供更多的服务。从地理上看,第1组设施集中在美国南部和西部。与第0集群相比,第1集群中营利设施的比重(91.4%比88.5%)更大。结论:这项研究突出了一个独特的集群表现不佳的透析诊所服务于社会经济弱势和种族多样化的人群。解决这些差异需要多方面的战略,包括患者层面、机构层面和政策层面的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochsner Journal
Ochsner Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信