Foveal Serous Retinal Detachment with Inferior Staphyloma: Long-Term Treatment Response to Anti-VEGF and Photodynamic Therapy.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jae Won Jun, Soyoung Jeon, Goeun Park, Hyun Goo Kang, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Min Kim, Sung Soo Kim, Suk Ho Byeon, Junwon Lee
{"title":"Foveal Serous Retinal Detachment with Inferior Staphyloma: Long-Term Treatment Response to Anti-VEGF and Photodynamic Therapy.","authors":"Jae Won Jun, Soyoung Jeon, Goeun Park, Hyun Goo Kang, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Min Kim, Sung Soo Kim, Suk Ho Byeon, Junwon Lee","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the treatment response and long-term prognosis of foveal serous retinal detachment (SRD) associated with inferior staphyloma to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment and photodynamic therapy (PDT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Treatment-naïve patients who underwent >24 months of follow-up were included. We analyzed inter-visit changes in the foveal subretinal fluid (SRF) height after anti-VEGF treatment or PDT compared to no treatment and long-term prognosis of best-corrected visual acuity in choroidal neovascularization (CNV)-free patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were enrolled, and the mean follow-up duration was 4.81 years. In 14 CNV-free patients, 11 received anti-VEGF injections, three patients underwent PDT, and two patients had both treatments. During the follow-up period, there were a total of 243 inter-visit events (88 injections and 155 observations without treatment). At the last visit of patients who received the treatment, complete resolution was more significantly achieved in the CNV group than in the CNV-free group (<i>p</i>=0.028). In CNV-free patients, visual acuity improved when complete resolution was achieved; otherwise, it generally decreased. After adjusting for confounding factors, analyses showed no statistically significant differences in inter-visit changes of foveal SRF height between the anti-VEGF treatment and no treatment cases (absolute value, rate, subgroup categorized as ±20% of change; <i>p</i>=0.733, <i>p</i>=0.916, <i>p</i>=0.277; respectively). All patients who underwent PDT did not show complete resolution or maintained improvement of SRF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with anti-VEGF and PDT do not seem to be effective for foveal SRD of CNV-free inferior staphyloma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 10","pages":"666-674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the treatment response and long-term prognosis of foveal serous retinal detachment (SRD) associated with inferior staphyloma to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment and photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Materials and methods: Treatment-naïve patients who underwent >24 months of follow-up were included. We analyzed inter-visit changes in the foveal subretinal fluid (SRF) height after anti-VEGF treatment or PDT compared to no treatment and long-term prognosis of best-corrected visual acuity in choroidal neovascularization (CNV)-free patients.

Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, and the mean follow-up duration was 4.81 years. In 14 CNV-free patients, 11 received anti-VEGF injections, three patients underwent PDT, and two patients had both treatments. During the follow-up period, there were a total of 243 inter-visit events (88 injections and 155 observations without treatment). At the last visit of patients who received the treatment, complete resolution was more significantly achieved in the CNV group than in the CNV-free group (p=0.028). In CNV-free patients, visual acuity improved when complete resolution was achieved; otherwise, it generally decreased. After adjusting for confounding factors, analyses showed no statistically significant differences in inter-visit changes of foveal SRF height between the anti-VEGF treatment and no treatment cases (absolute value, rate, subgroup categorized as ±20% of change; p=0.733, p=0.916, p=0.277; respectively). All patients who underwent PDT did not show complete resolution or maintained improvement of SRF.

Conclusion: Treatment with anti-VEGF and PDT do not seem to be effective for foveal SRD of CNV-free inferior staphyloma.

中央凹浆液性视网膜脱离伴下葡萄肿:抗vegf和光动力疗法的长期治疗反应。
目的:评价抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)和光动力治疗(PDT)对中央凹浆液性视网膜脱离(SRD)合并下葡萄肿的治疗效果及远期预后。材料和方法:Treatment-naïve接受>24个月随访的患者。我们分析了在无脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的患者中,抗vegf治疗或PDT治疗后与未治疗相比,中央凹视网膜下液(SRF)高度的访间变化和最佳矫正视力的长期预后。结果:19例患者入组,平均随访时间4.81年。在14例无cnv患者中,11例接受了抗vegf注射,3例接受了PDT治疗,2例接受了两种治疗。随访期间共发生243次访间事件(88次注射,155次未治疗观察)。在接受治疗的患者最后一次访视时,CNV组的完全缓解明显优于无CNV组(p=0.028)。在无cnv患者中,当达到完全分辨率时,视力得到改善;否则,它一般会下降。校正混杂因素后,分析显示抗vegf治疗组与未治疗组访间中央凹SRF高度变化差异无统计学意义(绝对值、发生率、亚组分别为±20%变化,p=0.733、p=0.916、p=0.277)。所有接受PDT治疗的患者都没有表现出完全的缓解或SRF的持续改善。结论:抗vegf联合PDT治疗无cnv下葡萄肿中央凹SRD无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信