Hearing Rehabilitation with Osia®2 in Patients with Bonebridge® Failure.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ji Min Yun, Yunbin Nam, Gerard Lapina, In Seok Moon
{"title":"Hearing Rehabilitation with Osia<sup>®</sup>2 in Patients with Bonebridge<sup>®</sup> Failure.","authors":"Ji Min Yun, Yunbin Nam, Gerard Lapina, In Seok Moon","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the clinical performance and patient satisfaction of the Osia<sup>®</sup>2 system with the Bonebridge<sup>®</sup> system in patients requiring reimplantation owing to Bonebridge<sup>®</sup> device malfunction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on seven patients who initially received Bonebridge<sup>®</sup> and subsequently underwent reimplantation with Osia<sup>®</sup>2 following device failure. Audiological outcomes were evaluated using pure tone audiometry and the Korean Hearing in Noise Test. Subjective outcomes were assessed with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Osia<sup>®</sup>2 provided greater low-frequency gain and comparable high-frequency gain compared to Bonebridge<sup>®</sup>. The median hearing gain with Osia<sup>®</sup>2 was 60.0 dB (interquartile range, 48.75-83.0), consistent with previous findings for this model and higher than those reported for the earlier Osia<sup>®</sup> model. Patient questionnaires indicated significant improvements in APHAB and SSQ scores with Osia<sup>®</sup>2 compared to both unaided and Bonebridge<sup>®</sup>-aided conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Osia<sup>®</sup>2 system demonstrated audiological outcomes and patient satisfaction comparable to the Bonebridge<sup>®</sup> system in this reimplantation cohort. Osia<sup>®</sup>2 may be a favorable option for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss or single-sided deafness, pending further studies on long-term device reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 10","pages":"695-702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical performance and patient satisfaction of the Osia®2 system with the Bonebridge® system in patients requiring reimplantation owing to Bonebridge® device malfunction.

Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on seven patients who initially received Bonebridge® and subsequently underwent reimplantation with Osia®2 following device failure. Audiological outcomes were evaluated using pure tone audiometry and the Korean Hearing in Noise Test. Subjective outcomes were assessed with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Results: Osia®2 provided greater low-frequency gain and comparable high-frequency gain compared to Bonebridge®. The median hearing gain with Osia®2 was 60.0 dB (interquartile range, 48.75-83.0), consistent with previous findings for this model and higher than those reported for the earlier Osia® model. Patient questionnaires indicated significant improvements in APHAB and SSQ scores with Osia®2 compared to both unaided and Bonebridge®-aided conditions.

Conclusion: The Osia®2 system demonstrated audiological outcomes and patient satisfaction comparable to the Bonebridge® system in this reimplantation cohort. Osia®2 may be a favorable option for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss or single-sided deafness, pending further studies on long-term device reliability.

Osia®2在骨桥失败患者中的听力康复
目的:本研究旨在比较Osia®2系统与Bonebridge®系统在因Bonebridge®装置故障而需要再植的患者中的临床表现和患者满意度。材料和方法:对7例最初接受Bonebridge®并随后在器械失效后接受Osia®2再植入术的患者进行回顾性图表回顾。使用纯音测听和韩国人噪音听力测试评估听力学结果。主观结果用助听器效益简表(APHAB)和语音、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)进行评估。结果:与Bonebridge®相比,Osia®2提供了更高的低频增益和相当的高频增益。Osia®2的中位听力增益为60.0 dB(四分位数范围48.75-83.0),与该模型先前的研究结果一致,高于早期Osia®模型的研究结果。患者问卷显示,与非辅助和Bonebridge辅助条件相比,Osia®2在APHAB和SSQ评分方面有显著改善。结论:Osia®2系统在该再植队列中表现出与Bonebridge®系统相当的听力学结果和患者满意度。对于传导性或混合性听力损失或单侧耳聋患者,Osia®2可能是一个有利的选择,有待于设备长期可靠性的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信