Andrea Matteucci, Michela Bonanni, Luca Sgarra, Carlo Pignalberi, Stefano Aquilani, Stefania Angela Di Fusco, Marco Valerio Mariani, Nicola Pierucci, Carlo Lavalle, Silvio Fedele, Federico Nardi, Furio Colivicchi
{"title":"Wearable cardioverter defibrillator for transient arrhythmic risk and sudden cardiac death prevention: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrea Matteucci, Michela Bonanni, Luca Sgarra, Carlo Pignalberi, Stefano Aquilani, Stefania Angela Di Fusco, Marco Valerio Mariani, Nicola Pierucci, Carlo Lavalle, Silvio Fedele, Federico Nardi, Furio Colivicchi","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a common cause of cardiovascular mortality, often triggered by ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of myocardial vulnerability. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) offers temporary protection against SCD, particularly when an implantable device is contraindicated or premature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of the WCD in appropriately terminating life-threatening arrhythmias such as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), preventing sudden cardiac death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically reviewed 40 studies comprising 59 647 adults fitted with a WCD for primary or secondary SCD prevention. Random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled incidence of appropriate WCD intervention was 3% (95% CI 2% to 3%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=88.9%). The prediction interval ranged from 1% to 8%, indicating that future studies conducted in selected high-risk populations may observe significantly higher WCD intervention. Life-threatening arrhythmias were higher during early follow-up (≤60 days). An appropriate daily WCD wearing time significantly influenced the results. Gender, age, ejection fraction and study design were not significant modifiers. No publication bias was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WCD represents an effective strategy for preventing SCD in early high-risk settings, with its benefit closely linked to adherence and appropriate patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a common cause of cardiovascular mortality, often triggered by ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of myocardial vulnerability. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) offers temporary protection against SCD, particularly when an implantable device is contraindicated or premature.
Objectives: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of the WCD in appropriately terminating life-threatening arrhythmias such as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), preventing sudden cardiac death.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically reviewed 40 studies comprising 59 647 adults fitted with a WCD for primary or secondary SCD prevention. Random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were performed.
Results: The pooled incidence of appropriate WCD intervention was 3% (95% CI 2% to 3%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=88.9%). The prediction interval ranged from 1% to 8%, indicating that future studies conducted in selected high-risk populations may observe significantly higher WCD intervention. Life-threatening arrhythmias were higher during early follow-up (≤60 days). An appropriate daily WCD wearing time significantly influenced the results. Gender, age, ejection fraction and study design were not significant modifiers. No publication bias was detected.
Conclusions: The WCD represents an effective strategy for preventing SCD in early high-risk settings, with its benefit closely linked to adherence and appropriate patient selection.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.