Pericardial segmentation: a proposed model to quantify disease burden.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Louis Jonas Giliomee, Janette Verster, Innocent Maposa, Anton Doubell, Pieter-Paul Strauss Robbertse, Philip Herbst
{"title":"Pericardial segmentation: a proposed model to quantify disease burden.","authors":"Louis Jonas Giliomee, Janette Verster, Innocent Maposa, Anton Doubell, Pieter-Paul Strauss Robbertse, Philip Herbst","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac MR (CMR) provides a comprehensive assessment of pericardial structure, tissue characteristics and constriction-related haemodynamics, making it an excellent tool for assessing the complex mechanisms that underlie constrictive pericarditis. To facilitate the reproducible quantification of pericardial disease burden, this article introduces the first standardised pericardial segmentation model validated against anatomical specimens, obtainable using standard CMR sectioning planes, and designed with equal weighting of individual pericardial segments for ease of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was created by assessing 100 morphologically normal forensic cardiac specimens with an equal gender distribution and a broad age range. Direct measurements of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) surface areas were obtained on standard cardiac short-axis forensic dissection slices. To assess variability in respective LV and RV segment sizes, data from the 100 specimens were compared with an idealised model developed to have identical respective LV and RV segment sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the LV and RV contributed similar areas (49.9% and 50.1%, respectively) of the total ventricular surface area. The LV pericardial area was well represented by those 11 segments of the 17-segment American Heart Association model that borders pericardium (measuring 4.51%±0.2% of the total pericardial area, per segment). The RV surface area was best represented by nine novel segments (measuring 5.54%±0.3% of the total pericardial area, per segment). A correlation between the measured and idealised models showed a mean difference of only 0.04% and 0.02% per segment for the LV and RV, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pericardial segmentation model, validated against anatomical specimens and obtainable using only standard CMR views, incorporates equal-sized LV and RV pericardial segments to ensure clinical usability. By enabling quantification of disease distribution and burden across both ventricles, the model has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and enhance precision in pericardial research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac MR (CMR) provides a comprehensive assessment of pericardial structure, tissue characteristics and constriction-related haemodynamics, making it an excellent tool for assessing the complex mechanisms that underlie constrictive pericarditis. To facilitate the reproducible quantification of pericardial disease burden, this article introduces the first standardised pericardial segmentation model validated against anatomical specimens, obtainable using standard CMR sectioning planes, and designed with equal weighting of individual pericardial segments for ease of use.

Methods: The model was created by assessing 100 morphologically normal forensic cardiac specimens with an equal gender distribution and a broad age range. Direct measurements of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) surface areas were obtained on standard cardiac short-axis forensic dissection slices. To assess variability in respective LV and RV segment sizes, data from the 100 specimens were compared with an idealised model developed to have identical respective LV and RV segment sizes.

Results: On average, the LV and RV contributed similar areas (49.9% and 50.1%, respectively) of the total ventricular surface area. The LV pericardial area was well represented by those 11 segments of the 17-segment American Heart Association model that borders pericardium (measuring 4.51%±0.2% of the total pericardial area, per segment). The RV surface area was best represented by nine novel segments (measuring 5.54%±0.3% of the total pericardial area, per segment). A correlation between the measured and idealised models showed a mean difference of only 0.04% and 0.02% per segment for the LV and RV, respectively.

Conclusions: This pericardial segmentation model, validated against anatomical specimens and obtainable using only standard CMR views, incorporates equal-sized LV and RV pericardial segments to ensure clinical usability. By enabling quantification of disease distribution and burden across both ventricles, the model has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and enhance precision in pericardial research.

心包分割:一种量化疾病负担的拟议模型。
背景:心脏MR (Cardiac MR)可以全面评估心包结构、组织特征和收缩相关的血流动力学,使其成为评估收缩性心包炎复杂机制的绝佳工具。为了便于心包疾病负担的可重复性量化,本文介绍了第一个标准化的心包分割模型,该模型通过解剖标本进行验证,可使用标准CMR切面获得,并设计为单个心包段的权重相等,以方便使用。方法:选取100例形态学正常的法医心脏标本,性别分布均匀,年龄范围广。在标准心脏短轴法医解剖切片上直接测量左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)表面积。为了评估左室和右室节段大小的可变性,将来自100个标本的数据与开发的具有相同左室和右室节段大小的理想模型进行比较。结果:平均而言,左室和右室占总心室表面积的面积相似,分别为49.9%和50.1%。美国心脏协会模型的17节段心包边界的11节段很好地代表了左室心包面积(每节段占总心包面积的4.51%±0.2%)。9个新节段最能代表右心室表面积(每节段约占总心包面积的5.54%±0.3%)。测量模型和理想模型之间的相关性显示,左心室和右心室每节段的平均差异分别只有0.04%和0.02%。结论:该心包分割模型通过解剖标本验证,仅使用标准CMR视图即可获得,包含等大小的左、右心包段,以确保临床可用性。通过量化两个心室的疾病分布和负担,该模型有可能改善临床决策并提高心包研究的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信