Aghnia J Putri, Decan Jiang, Zoltan Czigany, Arianeb Mehrabi, Markus Wolfgang Buechler, Uta Merle, Christoph Michalski, Peri Husen
{"title":"Validation of MELD 3.0 and ReMELD-Na scoring systems: a German clinical cohort study.","authors":"Aghnia J Putri, Decan Jiang, Zoltan Czigany, Arianeb Mehrabi, Markus Wolfgang Buechler, Uta Merle, Christoph Michalski, Peri Husen","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03846-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, introduced in 2002, has since been refined. MELD 3.0, launched in 2023 in the United States, improves mortality prediction by incorporating sex and albumin. Since March 2025, Germany started to use reMELD-Na to improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT). This study compares the performance of original MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 with and without albumin, and reMELD-Na for patients waitlisted for LT in a large German transplant center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 206 listed patients from 2017 to 2021 for LT. Reclassification patterns along with predictive accuracy for three-month survival and overall survival (OS) of five different MELD scores were assessed using Harrell's c-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 33.9 months, 100 patients (51.5%) underwent LT, with a post-transplant survival rate of 70%. Thirty-eight patients (18.4%) received LT and sixteen patients died within the first three months after listing. ReMELD-Na and MELD 3.0 without albumin demonstrated the highest discrimination for three-month survival (c-index 0.848 and 0.827, respectively). Original MELD showed the poorest discrimination. MELD 3.0 without albumin showed the best overall performance in predicting OS (c-index 0.827) in males, while reMELD-Na performed best in females (c-index 0.705). Females with higher original MELD scores tended to receive even higher scores with MELD 3.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first German study to validate reMELD-Na and MELD 3.0, showing superior predictive performance over original MELD. MELD 3.0 may better reflect disease severity in women at advanced stages due to more upward reclassification.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03846-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, introduced in 2002, has since been refined. MELD 3.0, launched in 2023 in the United States, improves mortality prediction by incorporating sex and albumin. Since March 2025, Germany started to use reMELD-Na to improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT). This study compares the performance of original MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 with and without albumin, and reMELD-Na for patients waitlisted for LT in a large German transplant center.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 206 listed patients from 2017 to 2021 for LT. Reclassification patterns along with predictive accuracy for three-month survival and overall survival (OS) of five different MELD scores were assessed using Harrell's c-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC).
Results: Over a median follow-up of 33.9 months, 100 patients (51.5%) underwent LT, with a post-transplant survival rate of 70%. Thirty-eight patients (18.4%) received LT and sixteen patients died within the first three months after listing. ReMELD-Na and MELD 3.0 without albumin demonstrated the highest discrimination for three-month survival (c-index 0.848 and 0.827, respectively). Original MELD showed the poorest discrimination. MELD 3.0 without albumin showed the best overall performance in predicting OS (c-index 0.827) in males, while reMELD-Na performed best in females (c-index 0.705). Females with higher original MELD scores tended to receive even higher scores with MELD 3.0.
Conclusion: This is the first German study to validate reMELD-Na and MELD 3.0, showing superior predictive performance over original MELD. MELD 3.0 may better reflect disease severity in women at advanced stages due to more upward reclassification.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.