Effective teamwork within healthcare - Let's finally make it happen! A realist evaluation.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kehoe A, Ellawala A, Karunaratne D, Tiffin P A, Crampton P E S
{"title":"Effective teamwork within healthcare - Let's finally make it happen! A realist evaluation.","authors":"Kehoe A, Ellawala A, Karunaratne D, Tiffin P A, Crampton P E S","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2561782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective teamwork is essential for the successful functioning of healthcare. Breakdowns in teamwork are frequently flagged as contributing to major patient safety issues. Current research indicates a lack of knowledge regarding key factors that impact upon teamwork and how medical educators can best prepare students. This study explores how doctors work within healthcare teams; exploring barriers and enablers to effective teamworking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A realist evaluation was used to understand the contextual influences and subsequent mechanisms that impact teamwork outcomes. Phase 1 included a realist literature review and scoping interviews with key stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 9). Phase 2 included 63 realist interviews representing a wide range of professional groups, roles and demographics across the UK healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial program theory developed in Phase 1 was refined during Phase 2, integrating and extending the dispersed and patchy current evidence on the contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes of teamwork. Enablers included building a positive and supportive culture, effective communication, leaders who are understanding and approachable, clearly defined roles and respect, and continuity and experience of those in newer roles. Barriers included high service demands and work pressures, power imbalances and negative hierarchy, a lack of support for those new to teams and organisations, poor communication, poor leadership, a lack of appreciation and understanding of the needs of differing groups within teams, and finally EDI issues. There were particular difficulties for those in newer roles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We have identified that team dynamics are likely to be hindered by transient teams, lack of support, dysfunctional leadership and communication, and non-approachable colleagues. There are currently clear difficulties in how doctors interact with those in newer roles, and the ways in which team members are integrated into teams. This is the first research to develop a teamworking programme theory that can be used to support educators, institutions and regulators.[Box: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2561782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective teamwork is essential for the successful functioning of healthcare. Breakdowns in teamwork are frequently flagged as contributing to major patient safety issues. Current research indicates a lack of knowledge regarding key factors that impact upon teamwork and how medical educators can best prepare students. This study explores how doctors work within healthcare teams; exploring barriers and enablers to effective teamworking.

Methods: A realist evaluation was used to understand the contextual influences and subsequent mechanisms that impact teamwork outcomes. Phase 1 included a realist literature review and scoping interviews with key stakeholders (n = 9). Phase 2 included 63 realist interviews representing a wide range of professional groups, roles and demographics across the UK healthcare.

Results: The initial program theory developed in Phase 1 was refined during Phase 2, integrating and extending the dispersed and patchy current evidence on the contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes of teamwork. Enablers included building a positive and supportive culture, effective communication, leaders who are understanding and approachable, clearly defined roles and respect, and continuity and experience of those in newer roles. Barriers included high service demands and work pressures, power imbalances and negative hierarchy, a lack of support for those new to teams and organisations, poor communication, poor leadership, a lack of appreciation and understanding of the needs of differing groups within teams, and finally EDI issues. There were particular difficulties for those in newer roles.

Discussion: We have identified that team dynamics are likely to be hindered by transient teams, lack of support, dysfunctional leadership and communication, and non-approachable colleagues. There are currently clear difficulties in how doctors interact with those in newer roles, and the ways in which team members are integrated into teams. This is the first research to develop a teamworking programme theory that can be used to support educators, institutions and regulators.[Box: see text].

在医疗保健中有效的团队合作-让我们最终实现它!一个现实主义的评价。
有效的团队合作对于医疗保健的成功运作至关重要。团队合作中的故障经常被标记为导致重大患者安全问题的原因。目前的研究表明,缺乏关于影响团队合作的关键因素以及医学教育者如何最好地为学生做好准备的知识。本研究探讨了医生如何在医疗团队中工作;探索有效团队合作的障碍和推动因素。方法:采用现实主义评价法来了解影响团队合作结果的情境影响及其后续机制。第一阶段包括现实主义文献回顾和与关键利益相关者的范围界定访谈(n = 9)。第二阶段包括63个现实主义访谈,代表了英国医疗保健领域广泛的专业群体、角色和人口统计数据。结果:在第一阶段形成的最初的计划理论在第二阶段得到了完善,整合和扩展了关于团队合作的背景、机制和结果的分散和不完整的现有证据。促成因素包括建立积极和支持性的文化,有效的沟通,理解和平易近人的领导者,明确定义的角色和尊重,以及新角色的连续性和经验。障碍包括高服务需求和工作压力,权力不平衡和消极的等级制度,缺乏对团队和组织新成员的支持,沟通不端,领导力低下,缺乏对团队内不同群体需求的欣赏和理解,最后是EDI问题。对于那些新角色的人来说,尤其困难。讨论:我们已经确定,团队动态可能会受到短暂团队,缺乏支持,功能失调的领导和沟通,以及不可接近的同事的阻碍。目前,医生如何与新角色的医生互动,以及团队成员如何融入团队,都存在明显的困难。这是第一个开发团队合作计划理论的研究,可以用来支持教育工作者、机构和监管机构。[方框:见文本]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信