Non-adherence to medications prescribed to patients with heart failure in general practice: prevalence, risk factors and association with mortality and hospitalisation.
Tarita Murray-Thomas, Alex Bottle, Jamil Mayet, Puja Myles
{"title":"Non-adherence to medications prescribed to patients with heart failure in general practice: prevalence, risk factors and association with mortality and hospitalisation.","authors":"Tarita Murray-Thomas, Alex Bottle, Jamil Mayet, Puja Myles","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In the UK, pharmacological management of patients with heart failure (HF) occurs predominantly in general practice. Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we examined the prevalence and risk factors for medication non-adherence and its association with hospitalisation and mortality over a 9-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 127 927 patients, ≥18 years old in England with incident HF diagnosed during 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated non-adherence to any ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, over 24 months. Non-adherence was based on proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as PDC<80%. Risk factors for non-adherence and all-cause mortality were examined using multiple logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Rates of any-cause emergency hospitalisations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and HF mortality was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk models. PDC was also assessed as a continuous variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 43.6% of patients were non-adherent to therapy. Crude rates of emergency admissions, all-cause, CVD and HF mortality overall were 306.8/1000, 119.6/1000, 44.6/1000 and 3.3/1000 person-years, respectively. The strongest predictor of non-adherence was any-cause hospitalisation ≤12 months prior. Non-adherence was associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.33) and significantly associated with CVD-related mortality (subdistribution HR (SHR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23), HF deaths (SHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) and any-cause emergency admissions (SHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.13). In the analysis treating PDC as a continuous variable, every 10% decrease in PDC levels was associated with a 6% increased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.06) and was significantly associated with CVD, but not HF mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication non-adherence over 24 months was relatively high and associated with poorer health outcomes. Interventions to improve adherence among patients with HF are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: In the UK, pharmacological management of patients with heart failure (HF) occurs predominantly in general practice. Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we examined the prevalence and risk factors for medication non-adherence and its association with hospitalisation and mortality over a 9-year period.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 127 927 patients, ≥18 years old in England with incident HF diagnosed during 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated non-adherence to any ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, over 24 months. Non-adherence was based on proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as PDC<80%. Risk factors for non-adherence and all-cause mortality were examined using multiple logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Rates of any-cause emergency hospitalisations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and HF mortality was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk models. PDC was also assessed as a continuous variable.
Results: About 43.6% of patients were non-adherent to therapy. Crude rates of emergency admissions, all-cause, CVD and HF mortality overall were 306.8/1000, 119.6/1000, 44.6/1000 and 3.3/1000 person-years, respectively. The strongest predictor of non-adherence was any-cause hospitalisation ≤12 months prior. Non-adherence was associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.33) and significantly associated with CVD-related mortality (subdistribution HR (SHR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23), HF deaths (SHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) and any-cause emergency admissions (SHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.13). In the analysis treating PDC as a continuous variable, every 10% decrease in PDC levels was associated with a 6% increased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.06) and was significantly associated with CVD, but not HF mortality.
Conclusion: Medication non-adherence over 24 months was relatively high and associated with poorer health outcomes. Interventions to improve adherence among patients with HF are needed.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.