João Pedro Vasconcelos Paolinelli, Taiana de Alencar, Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha, Mariana Linhares Pereira, Genival Araujo dos Santos Júnior
{"title":"Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review","authors":"João Pedro Vasconcelos Paolinelli, Taiana de Alencar, Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha, Mariana Linhares Pereira, Genival Araujo dos Santos Júnior","doi":"10.1111/jep.70285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>The implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in healthcare systems is multifactorial and complex. Some studies summarize the implementation research of these services in both outpatient and inpatient contexts. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis to understand how the implementation process occurs in Primary Health Care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To map, at an international level, the studies on the implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This scoping review followed the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in May 2023 across six electronic databases, grey literature, and the references of the selected studies. Original studies that described the implementation process of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently assessed the studies based on eligibility criteria and extracted data from the selected articles. Data were presented descriptively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 97 studies were included, with 85.6% (<i>n</i> = 83) conducted in developed countries. A significant emphasis was observed on qualitative and mixed-methods research, accounting for 46.4% (<i>n</i> = 45) of the studies. Only 22.7% (<i>n</i> = 22) of the studies utilized theoretical models as research guides, while 96.9% (<i>n</i> = 94), did not report on the implementation phase. Comprehensive Medication Management (36.8%, <i>n</i> = 35) was the most cited type of service. The most assessed implementation outcome was feasibility, at 73.2% (<i>n</i> = 71). A total of 47.4% (<i>n</i> = 46) assessed outcomes related to the implemented service, which included clinical, economic, and/or humanistic aspects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed numerous publications on the implementation of clinical services provided by pharmacists in primary care. These findings can guide future research on the implementation of these services and highlight the need for developing and underdeveloped countries to explore this topic further.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale
The implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in healthcare systems is multifactorial and complex. Some studies summarize the implementation research of these services in both outpatient and inpatient contexts. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis to understand how the implementation process occurs in Primary Health Care.
Aim
To map, at an international level, the studies on the implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care.
Method
This scoping review followed the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in May 2023 across six electronic databases, grey literature, and the references of the selected studies. Original studies that described the implementation process of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently assessed the studies based on eligibility criteria and extracted data from the selected articles. Data were presented descriptively.
Results
A total of 97 studies were included, with 85.6% (n = 83) conducted in developed countries. A significant emphasis was observed on qualitative and mixed-methods research, accounting for 46.4% (n = 45) of the studies. Only 22.7% (n = 22) of the studies utilized theoretical models as research guides, while 96.9% (n = 94), did not report on the implementation phase. Comprehensive Medication Management (36.8%, n = 35) was the most cited type of service. The most assessed implementation outcome was feasibility, at 73.2% (n = 71). A total of 47.4% (n = 46) assessed outcomes related to the implemented service, which included clinical, economic, and/or humanistic aspects.
Conclusion
This study revealed numerous publications on the implementation of clinical services provided by pharmacists in primary care. These findings can guide future research on the implementation of these services and highlight the need for developing and underdeveloped countries to explore this topic further.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.