Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
João Pedro Vasconcelos Paolinelli, Taiana de Alencar, Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha, Mariana Linhares Pereira, Genival Araujo dos Santos Júnior
{"title":"Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review","authors":"João Pedro Vasconcelos Paolinelli,&nbsp;Taiana de Alencar,&nbsp;Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha,&nbsp;Mariana Linhares Pereira,&nbsp;Genival Araujo dos Santos Júnior","doi":"10.1111/jep.70285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>The implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in healthcare systems is multifactorial and complex. Some studies summarize the implementation research of these services in both outpatient and inpatient contexts. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis to understand how the implementation process occurs in Primary Health Care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To map, at an international level, the studies on the implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This scoping review followed the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in May 2023 across six electronic databases, grey literature, and the references of the selected studies. Original studies that described the implementation process of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently assessed the studies based on eligibility criteria and extracted data from the selected articles. Data were presented descriptively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 97 studies were included, with 85.6% (<i>n</i> = 83) conducted in developed countries. A significant emphasis was observed on qualitative and mixed-methods research, accounting for 46.4% (<i>n</i> = 45) of the studies. Only 22.7% (<i>n</i> = 22) of the studies utilized theoretical models as research guides, while 96.9% (<i>n</i> = 94), did not report on the implementation phase. Comprehensive Medication Management (36.8%, <i>n</i> = 35) was the most cited type of service. The most assessed implementation outcome was feasibility, at 73.2% (<i>n</i> = 71). A total of 47.4% (<i>n</i> = 46) assessed outcomes related to the implemented service, which included clinical, economic, and/or humanistic aspects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed numerous publications on the implementation of clinical services provided by pharmacists in primary care. These findings can guide future research on the implementation of these services and highlight the need for developing and underdeveloped countries to explore this topic further.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

The implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in healthcare systems is multifactorial and complex. Some studies summarize the implementation research of these services in both outpatient and inpatient contexts. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis to understand how the implementation process occurs in Primary Health Care.

Aim

To map, at an international level, the studies on the implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care.

Method

This scoping review followed the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in May 2023 across six electronic databases, grey literature, and the references of the selected studies. Original studies that described the implementation process of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently assessed the studies based on eligibility criteria and extracted data from the selected articles. Data were presented descriptively.

Results

A total of 97 studies were included, with 85.6% (n = 83) conducted in developed countries. A significant emphasis was observed on qualitative and mixed-methods research, accounting for 46.4% (n = 45) of the studies. Only 22.7% (n = 22) of the studies utilized theoretical models as research guides, while 96.9% (n = 94), did not report on the implementation phase. Comprehensive Medication Management (36.8%, n = 35) was the most cited type of service. The most assessed implementation outcome was feasibility, at 73.2% (n = 71). A total of 47.4% (n = 46) assessed outcomes related to the implemented service, which included clinical, economic, and/or humanistic aspects.

Conclusion

This study revealed numerous publications on the implementation of clinical services provided by pharmacists in primary care. These findings can guide future research on the implementation of these services and highlight the need for developing and underdeveloped countries to explore this topic further.

Abstract Image

初级卫生保健中临床药学服务的实施:范围审查。
理由:临床药学服务在卫生保健系统的实施是多因素和复杂的。一些研究总结了这些服务在门诊和住院情况下的实施研究。然而,文献缺乏一个全面的综合,以了解实施过程如何发生在初级卫生保健。目的:在国际范围内对初级卫生保健中临床药学服务的实施情况进行研究。方法:该范围综述遵循JBI范围综述证据综合手册的建议。我们于2023年5月对6个电子数据库、灰色文献和所选研究的参考文献进行了系统检索。描述初级卫生保健中临床药学服务实施过程的原始研究符合纳入条件。两名研究人员根据入选标准独立评估研究,并从选定的文章中提取数据。数据以描述性方式呈现。结果:共纳入97项研究,85.6% (n = 83)来自发达国家。定性和混合方法研究占研究总数的46.4% (n = 45)。只有22.7% (n = 22)的研究使用理论模型作为研究指导,而96.9% (n = 94)的研究没有报告实施阶段。综合用药管理(36.8%,n = 35)是被引用最多的服务类型。评估最多的实施结果是可行性,占73.2% (n = 71)。共有47.4% (n = 46)评估了与实施服务相关的结果,包括临床、经济和/或人文方面。结论:本研究揭示了大量关于初级保健中药剂师提供的临床服务实施的出版物。这些发现可以指导未来关于这些服务实施的研究,并强调发展中国家和不发达国家进一步探索这一主题的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信