Safety and Effectiveness of Allergen Immunotherapy in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S546044
Ana I Tabar, Julio Delgado-Romero, Eloína González-Mancebo, Javier Domínguez-Ortega, Lorena Soto-Retes
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Allergen Immunotherapy in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma.","authors":"Ana I Tabar, Julio Delgado-Romero, Eloína González-Mancebo, Javier Domínguez-Ortega, Lorena Soto-Retes","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S546044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an established treatment for mild to moderate allergic asthma. However, limited data are available regarding its safety and efficacy in patients with severe asthma. This study aimed to gather real-world evidence (RWE) on the safety and effectiveness of AIT in individuals with severe asthma caused by sensitization to at least 1 allergen, who were either currently undergoing AIT or had received it within the past five years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in Spain, including patients aged ≥6 years with severe asthma (Spanish Guideline for Asthma Management [GEMA] steps 5-6 and Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] step 5) sensitized to at least 1 allergen who had received AIT within the previous 5 years, to evaluate safety and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 93 patients (54.8% female) with a median age of 40.3 years, including 5 under 14. A total of 16 systemic reactions (SRs) were reported in 8 patients (8.6%), mostly immediate (13/16) and occurring during the initiation phase (12/16), all in patients receiving subcutaneous immunotherapy. Most SRs were mild to moderate, except for 2 severe reactions in 1 patient. Only 3 patients discontinued treatment. Significant improvements in both FeNO and FEV<sub>1</sub> (%) were observed after 6 and 12 months of AIT, respectively. Quality of Life (through mini-AQLQ) scores improved at 1, 2 and 3 years after initiation of AIT compared to baseline. The number of patients who did not require rescue medication for asthma was significantly higher after starting AIT than before treatment. AIT was also associated with a 75.8% reduction in the number of emergency visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of AIT in patients with well-controlled severe asthma in routine clinical practice. Additional prospective real-world studies are needed to better understand the efficacy of AIT in severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1311-1326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S546044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an established treatment for mild to moderate allergic asthma. However, limited data are available regarding its safety and efficacy in patients with severe asthma. This study aimed to gather real-world evidence (RWE) on the safety and effectiveness of AIT in individuals with severe asthma caused by sensitization to at least 1 allergen, who were either currently undergoing AIT or had received it within the past five years.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Spain, including patients aged ≥6 years with severe asthma (Spanish Guideline for Asthma Management [GEMA] steps 5-6 and Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] step 5) sensitized to at least 1 allergen who had received AIT within the previous 5 years, to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

Results: The study included 93 patients (54.8% female) with a median age of 40.3 years, including 5 under 14. A total of 16 systemic reactions (SRs) were reported in 8 patients (8.6%), mostly immediate (13/16) and occurring during the initiation phase (12/16), all in patients receiving subcutaneous immunotherapy. Most SRs were mild to moderate, except for 2 severe reactions in 1 patient. Only 3 patients discontinued treatment. Significant improvements in both FeNO and FEV1 (%) were observed after 6 and 12 months of AIT, respectively. Quality of Life (through mini-AQLQ) scores improved at 1, 2 and 3 years after initiation of AIT compared to baseline. The number of patients who did not require rescue medication for asthma was significantly higher after starting AIT than before treatment. AIT was also associated with a 75.8% reduction in the number of emergency visits.

Conclusion: This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of AIT in patients with well-controlled severe asthma in routine clinical practice. Additional prospective real-world studies are needed to better understand the efficacy of AIT in severe asthma.

过敏原免疫治疗对严重过敏性哮喘患者的安全性和有效性。
目的:过敏原免疫疗法(AIT)是一种治疗轻中度过敏性哮喘的有效方法。然而,关于其在严重哮喘患者中的安全性和有效性的数据有限。本研究旨在收集真实世界的证据(RWE),证明对至少1种过敏原致敏引起的严重哮喘患者正在接受AIT治疗或在过去5年内接受过AIT治疗的AIT治疗的安全性和有效性。方法:在西班牙进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了年龄≥6岁的严重哮喘患者(西班牙哮喘管理指南[GEMA]步骤5-6和全球哮喘倡议[GINA]步骤5),这些患者在过去5年内接受了AIT,对至少1种过敏原敏感,以评估安全性和有效性。结果:纳入93例患者,其中女性54.8%,中位年龄40.3岁,14岁以下5例。8例患者(8.6%)共报告了16例全身反应(SRs),大多数是立即发生的(13/16),发生在起始期(12/16),所有患者均接受皮下免疫治疗。除1例患者中2例严重反应外,大多数SRs为轻至中度反应。只有3例患者停止治疗。在AIT治疗6个月和12个月后分别观察到FeNO和FEV1(%)的显著改善。与基线相比,AIT开始后1年、2年和3年的生活质量(通过mini-AQLQ)评分均有所改善。开始AIT治疗后,不需要抢救药物治疗哮喘的患者数量明显高于治疗前。该技术还使急诊次数减少了75.8%。结论:本研究在常规临床实践中证实了AIT治疗控制良好的重症哮喘患者的安全性和有效性。需要更多的前瞻性现实研究来更好地了解AIT治疗严重哮喘的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信