Comparison of methods for identifying the optimal treatment duration in randomized trials for antibiotics.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09050-y
Suzanne M Dufault, Brian H Aldana, Patrick P J Phillips
{"title":"Comparison of methods for identifying the optimal treatment duration in randomized trials for antibiotics.","authors":"Suzanne M Dufault, Brian H Aldana, Patrick P J Phillips","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09050-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment must strike a delicate balance: it must be long enough to achieve desirable efficacy yet short enough to prevent the development of toxicities, adverse events, and mitigate other arduous aspects related to patient burden. Historically, the approach used to determine duration of antibiotic treatment has been inefficient, severely impacting the refinement of therapeutics for tuberculosis (TB) where treatment duration, and its complications, can be extensive. Many of the challenges in duration-ranging have parallels and proposed solutions in the field of dose-ranging where the literature is substantially more established and where the traditions of qualitative, pairwise comparison studies have been replaced with model-based approaches. Such methods are more efficient and allow for interpolation between the doses observed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work examines the utility of cutting-edge dose-finding methods (such as MCP-Mod) for duration-ranging of TB treatments. We compare the operating characteristics of the adapted model-based duration-ranging methodologies against standard qualitative methods for the purposes of estimating optimal duration and describing the duration-response relationship, using a simulation study motivated by a Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Response Over Continuous Intervention (MAMS-ROCI) clinical trial design. We explore three specific targets: (1) power to detect a duration-response relationship, (2) ability to accurately reproduce the duration-response curve, and (3) ability to estimate the optimal duration within an acceptable margin of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that model-based methods outperform standard qualitative comparisons on every target examined, particularly when the sample size is constrained to that of a typical Phase II trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the success of the next era in TB therapeutics duration evaluation trials, and antibiotics duration-ranging more broadly, will meaningfully rely on the ability to simultaneously pair innovative model-based statistical methods with re-imagined study designs such as MAMS-ROCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09050-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment must strike a delicate balance: it must be long enough to achieve desirable efficacy yet short enough to prevent the development of toxicities, adverse events, and mitigate other arduous aspects related to patient burden. Historically, the approach used to determine duration of antibiotic treatment has been inefficient, severely impacting the refinement of therapeutics for tuberculosis (TB) where treatment duration, and its complications, can be extensive. Many of the challenges in duration-ranging have parallels and proposed solutions in the field of dose-ranging where the literature is substantially more established and where the traditions of qualitative, pairwise comparison studies have been replaced with model-based approaches. Such methods are more efficient and allow for interpolation between the doses observed.

Methods: This work examines the utility of cutting-edge dose-finding methods (such as MCP-Mod) for duration-ranging of TB treatments. We compare the operating characteristics of the adapted model-based duration-ranging methodologies against standard qualitative methods for the purposes of estimating optimal duration and describing the duration-response relationship, using a simulation study motivated by a Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Response Over Continuous Intervention (MAMS-ROCI) clinical trial design. We explore three specific targets: (1) power to detect a duration-response relationship, (2) ability to accurately reproduce the duration-response curve, and (3) ability to estimate the optimal duration within an acceptable margin of error.

Results: We find that model-based methods outperform standard qualitative comparisons on every target examined, particularly when the sample size is constrained to that of a typical Phase II trial.

Conclusions: We conclude that the success of the next era in TB therapeutics duration evaluation trials, and antibiotics duration-ranging more broadly, will meaningfully rely on the ability to simultaneously pair innovative model-based statistical methods with re-imagined study designs such as MAMS-ROCI.

抗生素随机试验中确定最佳治疗时间的方法比较。
背景:抗生素治疗的最佳持续时间必须达到一个微妙的平衡:它必须足够长以达到理想的疗效,但也必须足够短以防止毒性、不良事件的发展,并减轻与患者负担相关的其他艰巨方面。从历史上看,用于确定抗生素治疗持续时间的方法效率低下,严重影响了结核病治疗方法的改进,因为结核病的治疗持续时间及其并发症可能很长。持续时间范围的许多挑战在剂量范围领域也有相似之处,并提出了解决办法,在剂量范围领域,文献基本上更为成熟,定性的两两比较研究的传统已被基于模型的方法所取代。这种方法更有效,并允许在观察到的剂量之间进行插值。方法:这项工作考察了尖端剂量测定方法(如MCP-Mod)在持续时间范围内的结核病治疗中的效用。为了估计最佳持续时间和描述持续时间-反应关系,我们使用了一项由多臂多阶段连续干预反应(MAMS-ROCI)临床试验设计驱动的模拟研究,比较了基于适应模型的持续时间范围方法与标准定性方法的操作特征。我们探讨了三个具体目标:(1)检测持续时间-响应关系的能力,(2)准确再现持续时间-响应曲线的能力,以及(3)在可接受的误差范围内估计最佳持续时间的能力。结果:我们发现基于模型的方法在每一个被检查的目标上都优于标准的定性比较,特别是当样本量受限于典型的II期试验时。结论:我们得出结论,结核病治疗持续时间评估试验的下一个时代的成功,以及更广泛的抗生素持续时间范围,将有意义地依赖于同时将创新的基于模型的统计方法与重新设想的研究设计(如MAMS-ROCI)结合起来的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信