Optimization of 99mTc-SPECT in the presence of 90Y for radioembolization.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Camiel E M Kerckhaert, Martijn M A Dietze, Rob van Rooij, Marjolein B M Meddens, Niek Wijnen, Maarten L J Smits, Marnix G E H Lam, Hugo W A M de Jong
{"title":"Optimization of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-SPECT in the presence of <sup>90</sup>Y for radioembolization.","authors":"Camiel E M Kerckhaert, Martijn M A Dietze, Rob van Rooij, Marjolein B M Meddens, Niek Wijnen, Maarten L J Smits, Marnix G E H Lam, Hugo W A M de Jong","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00798-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>99m</sup>Tc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) imaging is part of the standard work-up procedure for radioembolization using <sup>90</sup>Y microspheres. In certain scenarios, it may be warranted to visualize the distribution of <sup>99m</sup>Tc in co-presence of <sup>90</sup>Y, for example when validating intra-procedural <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA imaging after <sup>90</sup>Y-therapy to enable single-session radioembolization. Another instance involves additional <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA administration during the therapeutic procedure itself, e.g. when initial imaging reveals insufficient targeting of a specific liver segment. In these situations, crosstalk from <sup>90</sup>Y can result in reduced <sup>99m</sup>Tc image quality and quantitative accuracy. This study investigates the feasibility and optimal method of <sup>99m</sup>Tc SPECT imaging from combined <sup>99m</sup>Tc+<sup>90</sup>Y data using phantom experiments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An anthropomorphic torso phantom with two liver tumor inserts was filled with <sup>99m</sup>Tc without (single-isotope) and with <sup>90</sup>Y (dual-isotope) in various activities and isotope concentrations. Three collimators (low energy high resolution: LEHR, medium energy: ME, and high energy: HE) and three methods to compensate for <sup>90</sup>Y crosstalk in the <sup>99m</sup>Tc photo peak window (Monte Carlo-based, dual-energy-window and triple-energy-window correction) were evaluated. No substantial dead-time effects were observed in the clinically relevant activity range, up to approximately 12 GBq <sup>99m</sup>Tc+<sup>90</sup>Y (ratio 1:20) with LEHR, 29 GBq with ME and > 30 GBq with HE. Compared to the clinical standard (single-isotope <sup>99m</sup>Tc imaging with LEHR collimator), contrast recovery typically decreased from 70.0 ± 1.3% to 49.0 ± 0.9% (LEHR), 61.2 ± 1.5% (ME) or 62.1 ± 1.4% (HE) due to <sup>90</sup>Y crosstalk. Compensation methods increased contrast recovery, with Monte Carlo-based correction combined with a ME or HE collimator yielding the best recovery at 68.5 ± 1.6% and 68.3 ± 1.5%, respectively. Visual image quality in terms of resolution and scatter contamination was superior when using a ME collimator. Lung shunt fractions were also severely affected by <sup>90</sup>Y crosstalk when using LEHR, but could be effectively mitigated using a ME or HE collimator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>99m</sup>Tc imaging in the presence of <sup>90</sup>Y leads to substantial image degradation due to crosstalk effects. Monte Carlo-based crosstalk compensation in combination with a ME or HE collimator was identified as the most accurate, robust and visually optimal reconstruction method for <sup>99m</sup>Tc SPECT from dual-isotope data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00798-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) imaging is part of the standard work-up procedure for radioembolization using 90Y microspheres. In certain scenarios, it may be warranted to visualize the distribution of 99mTc in co-presence of 90Y, for example when validating intra-procedural 99mTc-MAA imaging after 90Y-therapy to enable single-session radioembolization. Another instance involves additional 99mTc-MAA administration during the therapeutic procedure itself, e.g. when initial imaging reveals insufficient targeting of a specific liver segment. In these situations, crosstalk from 90Y can result in reduced 99mTc image quality and quantitative accuracy. This study investigates the feasibility and optimal method of 99mTc SPECT imaging from combined 99mTc+90Y data using phantom experiments.

Results: An anthropomorphic torso phantom with two liver tumor inserts was filled with 99mTc without (single-isotope) and with 90Y (dual-isotope) in various activities and isotope concentrations. Three collimators (low energy high resolution: LEHR, medium energy: ME, and high energy: HE) and three methods to compensate for 90Y crosstalk in the 99mTc photo peak window (Monte Carlo-based, dual-energy-window and triple-energy-window correction) were evaluated. No substantial dead-time effects were observed in the clinically relevant activity range, up to approximately 12 GBq 99mTc+90Y (ratio 1:20) with LEHR, 29 GBq with ME and > 30 GBq with HE. Compared to the clinical standard (single-isotope 99mTc imaging with LEHR collimator), contrast recovery typically decreased from 70.0 ± 1.3% to 49.0 ± 0.9% (LEHR), 61.2 ± 1.5% (ME) or 62.1 ± 1.4% (HE) due to 90Y crosstalk. Compensation methods increased contrast recovery, with Monte Carlo-based correction combined with a ME or HE collimator yielding the best recovery at 68.5 ± 1.6% and 68.3 ± 1.5%, respectively. Visual image quality in terms of resolution and scatter contamination was superior when using a ME collimator. Lung shunt fractions were also severely affected by 90Y crosstalk when using LEHR, but could be effectively mitigated using a ME or HE collimator.

Conclusion: 99mTc imaging in the presence of 90Y leads to substantial image degradation due to crosstalk effects. Monte Carlo-based crosstalk compensation in combination with a ME or HE collimator was identified as the most accurate, robust and visually optimal reconstruction method for 99mTc SPECT from dual-isotope data.

90Y存在下99mTc-SPECT放射栓塞的优化。
背景:99mtc巨聚集白蛋白(MAA)成像是使用90Y微球放射栓塞的标准检查程序的一部分。在某些情况下,可能需要在90Y同时存在的情况下可视化99mTc的分布,例如,在90Y治疗后验证术中99mTc- maa成像以实现单次放射栓塞。另一个例子涉及在治疗过程中额外给药99mTc-MAA,例如当初始成像显示特定肝段靶向不足时。在这些情况下,来自90Y的串扰可能导致99mTc图像质量和定量精度降低。本研究通过幻像实验探讨了99mTc+90Y组合数据进行99mTc SPECT成像的可行性和最佳方法。结果:一个具有两个肝脏肿瘤插入的仿人躯干假体充满了不同活性和同位素浓度的99mTc(无单同位素)和90Y(双同位素)。评估了三种准直器(低能量高分辨率:LEHR,中能量:ME和高能:HE)和三种补偿99mTc光峰窗口90Y串扰的方法(基于蒙特卡罗的、双能量窗口和三能量窗口校正)。在临床相关活动范围内未观察到实质性的死期效应,LEHR组高达约12 GBq 99mTc+90Y(比例1:20),ME组为29 GBq, HE组为30 GBq。与临床标准(LEHR准直器单同位素99mTc成像)相比,由于90Y串扰,对比度恢复通常从70.0±1.3%下降到49.0±0.9% (LEHR), 61.2±1.5% (ME)或62.1±1.4% (HE)。补偿方法提高了对比度恢复,蒙特卡罗校正结合ME或HE准直器的对比度恢复效果最好,分别为68.5±1.6%和68.3±1.5%。当使用ME准直器时,在分辨率和散射污染方面的视觉图像质量是优越的。当使用LEHR时,肺分流分数也受到90Y串扰的严重影响,但可以使用ME或HE准直器有效地减轻。结论:99mTc成像在90Y存在下,由于串扰效应导致图像严重退化。基于蒙特卡罗的串扰补偿结合ME或HE准直器被认为是最准确、鲁棒和视觉最优的99mTc双同位素SPECT重建方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信