Does ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates compromise the radiographic diagnosis of simulated internal root resorption?

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Taruska Ventorini Vasconcelos, Frederico Sampaio Neves, Matheus L Oliveira
{"title":"Does ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates compromise the radiographic diagnosis of simulated internal root resorption?","authors":"Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Taruska Ventorini Vasconcelos, Frederico Sampaio Neves, Matheus L Oliveira","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of ambient exposure of photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates and digital enhancement on detecting internal root resorption (IRR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five single-rooted teeth were selected, including 15 with artificially induced IRR (via 3-hour immersion in 37% hydrochloric acid) and 20 controls. Three repeated periapical radiographs were acquired of each tooth using the parallelling technique and PSP plates from the Express, VistaScan Mini, and CS 7600 digital radiographic imaging systems. For each set of 3 X-ray exposures, prior to scanning, one PSP plate was kept shielded from ambient light, another was exposed to ambient light for 5 seconds, while the third was exposed for 10 seconds. The presence of IRR in the total sample of 315 radiographs was assessed by 4 independent examiners using a 5-point scale. Initially, digital enhancement was not allowed, and these images were considered originals. A second round was conducted with adjustments permitted (enhanced radiographs). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared using 2-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found among different light exposure times across all systems (P > .05). In the CS 7600, enhanced radiographs showed significantly higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared to originals (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambient light exposure of PSP for up to 10 seconds does not compromise IRR diagnosis. Digital enhancement in CS 7600 may increase detection but reduce specificity, requiring cautious interpretation to avoid overdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of ambient exposure of photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates and digital enhancement on detecting internal root resorption (IRR).

Methods: Thirty-five single-rooted teeth were selected, including 15 with artificially induced IRR (via 3-hour immersion in 37% hydrochloric acid) and 20 controls. Three repeated periapical radiographs were acquired of each tooth using the parallelling technique and PSP plates from the Express, VistaScan Mini, and CS 7600 digital radiographic imaging systems. For each set of 3 X-ray exposures, prior to scanning, one PSP plate was kept shielded from ambient light, another was exposed to ambient light for 5 seconds, while the third was exposed for 10 seconds. The presence of IRR in the total sample of 315 radiographs was assessed by 4 independent examiners using a 5-point scale. Initially, digital enhancement was not allowed, and these images were considered originals. A second round was conducted with adjustments permitted (enhanced radiographs). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared using 2-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).

Results: No significant differences were found among different light exposure times across all systems (P > .05). In the CS 7600, enhanced radiographs showed significantly higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared to originals (P < .05).

Conclusions: Ambient light exposure of PSP for up to 10 seconds does not compromise IRR diagnosis. Digital enhancement in CS 7600 may increase detection but reduce specificity, requiring cautious interpretation to avoid overdiagnosis.

光刺激荧光粉片的环境光暴露会影响模拟内根吸收的影像学诊断吗?
目的:评价光刺激荧光粉(PSP)板环境暴露和数字增强对检测根内吸收(IRR)的影响。方法:选择35颗单根牙,其中人工诱导IRR 15颗(37%盐酸浸泡3小时),对照组20颗。采用Express、VistaScan Mini和CS 7600数字放射成像系统的平行技术和PSP板对每颗牙进行3次尖周x线片重复拍摄。每组三次x射线曝光,在扫描前,一个PSP板与环境光隔绝,另一个暴露在环境光下5秒,第三个暴露在环境光下10秒。在315张x光片的总样本中,IRR的存在由四名独立检查员使用五分制进行评估。最初,数字增强是不允许的,这些图像被认为是原件。在允许调整的情况下进行第二轮检查(增强x线片)。计算灵敏度、特异度和ROC曲线下面积,采用双因素方差分析(α = 0.05)进行比较。结果:不同光照时间在各系统间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。在CS 7600中,增强x线片与原始x线片相比显示出更高的灵敏度和更低的特异性(p)。结论:PSP环境光暴露10秒不会影响IRR的诊断。CS 7600的数字增强可能增加检出率,但降低特异性,需要谨慎解释,避免过度诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书