{"title":"Does ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates compromise the radiographic diagnosis of simulated internal root resorption?","authors":"Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Taruska Ventorini Vasconcelos, Frederico Sampaio Neves, Matheus L Oliveira","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of ambient exposure of photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates and digital enhancement on detecting internal root resorption (IRR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five single-rooted teeth were selected, including 15 with artificially induced IRR (via 3-hour immersion in 37% hydrochloric acid) and 20 controls. Three repeated periapical radiographs were acquired of each tooth using the parallelling technique and PSP plates from the Express, VistaScan Mini, and CS 7600 digital radiographic imaging systems. For each set of 3 X-ray exposures, prior to scanning, one PSP plate was kept shielded from ambient light, another was exposed to ambient light for 5 seconds, while the third was exposed for 10 seconds. The presence of IRR in the total sample of 315 radiographs was assessed by 4 independent examiners using a 5-point scale. Initially, digital enhancement was not allowed, and these images were considered originals. A second round was conducted with adjustments permitted (enhanced radiographs). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared using 2-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found among different light exposure times across all systems (P > .05). In the CS 7600, enhanced radiographs showed significantly higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared to originals (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambient light exposure of PSP for up to 10 seconds does not compromise IRR diagnosis. Digital enhancement in CS 7600 may increase detection but reduce specificity, requiring cautious interpretation to avoid overdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of ambient exposure of photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates and digital enhancement on detecting internal root resorption (IRR).
Methods: Thirty-five single-rooted teeth were selected, including 15 with artificially induced IRR (via 3-hour immersion in 37% hydrochloric acid) and 20 controls. Three repeated periapical radiographs were acquired of each tooth using the parallelling technique and PSP plates from the Express, VistaScan Mini, and CS 7600 digital radiographic imaging systems. For each set of 3 X-ray exposures, prior to scanning, one PSP plate was kept shielded from ambient light, another was exposed to ambient light for 5 seconds, while the third was exposed for 10 seconds. The presence of IRR in the total sample of 315 radiographs was assessed by 4 independent examiners using a 5-point scale. Initially, digital enhancement was not allowed, and these images were considered originals. A second round was conducted with adjustments permitted (enhanced radiographs). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared using 2-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).
Results: No significant differences were found among different light exposure times across all systems (P > .05). In the CS 7600, enhanced radiographs showed significantly higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared to originals (P < .05).
Conclusions: Ambient light exposure of PSP for up to 10 seconds does not compromise IRR diagnosis. Digital enhancement in CS 7600 may increase detection but reduce specificity, requiring cautious interpretation to avoid overdiagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X