Predictive value of Shanghai score system in patients with drug-induced type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Vincenzo Russo, Alfredo Caturano, Federico Migliore, Federico Guerra, Pietro Francia, Martina Nesti, Giulio Conte, Alessandro Paoletti Perini, Giuseppe Mascia, Stefano Albani, Procolo Marchese, Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono, Gregory Dendramis, Andrea Rossi, Andrea Ottonelli Ghidini, Pasquale Notarstefano, Luigi Sciarra, Zefferino Palamà, Enrico Baldi, Roberto Floris, Gerardo Nigro
{"title":"Predictive value of Shanghai score system in patients with drug-induced type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern.","authors":"Vincenzo Russo, Alfredo Caturano, Federico Migliore, Federico Guerra, Pietro Francia, Martina Nesti, Giulio Conte, Alessandro Paoletti Perini, Giuseppe Mascia, Stefano Albani, Procolo Marchese, Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono, Gregory Dendramis, Andrea Rossi, Andrea Ottonelli Ghidini, Pasquale Notarstefano, Luigi Sciarra, Zefferino Palamà, Enrico Baldi, Roberto Floris, Gerardo Nigro","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02738-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Shanghai score system was developed to enhance the risk stratification in Brugada Syndrome (BrS); however, its prognostic value in drug-induced type 1 BrS remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved 698 patients with drug-induced type 1 BrS, confirmed via pharmacologic challenge (flecainide or ajmaline), from 21 centers in Italy and Switzerland. Patients were classified according to the Shanghai score system: probable/definite BrS (score ≥ 3.5) and possible BrS (score < 3.5). The primary outcome was appropriate ICD therapy or sudden cardiac death (SCD)/sustained ventricular arrhythmias; the secondary outcome includes the identification of clinical predictors of primary outcome events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study population included 239 patients (34.2%) with probable/definite BrS and 459 (65.8%) patients with possible BrS. During a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 20 patients (2.9%) experienced the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower event rate in possible BrS (0.11% over 10 years) compared to probable/definite BrS (0.42%). SCN5A pathogenic variants were a significant predictor of primary endpoint in the possible BrS group (OR: 12.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shanghai score system for BrS diagnosis may be useful as a tool for risk stratification of life-threatening arrhythmias among patients with drug-induced type I BrS ECG. Identifying the SCN5A mutations is of pivotal importance for refining the risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02738-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Shanghai score system was developed to enhance the risk stratification in Brugada Syndrome (BrS); however, its prognostic value in drug-induced type 1 BrS remains unclear.

Methods: This study involved 698 patients with drug-induced type 1 BrS, confirmed via pharmacologic challenge (flecainide or ajmaline), from 21 centers in Italy and Switzerland. Patients were classified according to the Shanghai score system: probable/definite BrS (score ≥ 3.5) and possible BrS (score < 3.5). The primary outcome was appropriate ICD therapy or sudden cardiac death (SCD)/sustained ventricular arrhythmias; the secondary outcome includes the identification of clinical predictors of primary outcome events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used.

Results: Our study population included 239 patients (34.2%) with probable/definite BrS and 459 (65.8%) patients with possible BrS. During a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 20 patients (2.9%) experienced the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower event rate in possible BrS (0.11% over 10 years) compared to probable/definite BrS (0.42%). SCN5A pathogenic variants were a significant predictor of primary endpoint in the possible BrS group (OR: 12.5).

Conclusions: Shanghai score system for BrS diagnosis may be useful as a tool for risk stratification of life-threatening arrhythmias among patients with drug-induced type I BrS ECG. Identifying the SCN5A mutations is of pivotal importance for refining the risk stratification.

上海评分系统对药物性1型Brugada心电图的预测价值。
背景:开发上海评分系统是为了加强Brugada综合征(BrS)的风险分层;然而,其在药物诱导的1型BrS中的预后价值尚不清楚。方法:本研究纳入698例药物诱导的1型BrS患者,通过药理学挑战(flecainide或ajmaline)证实,来自意大利和瑞士的21个中心。根据上海评分系统对患者进行分类:可能/明确BrS(评分≥3.5)和可能BrS(评分)。结果:我们的研究人群中有239例(34.2%)为可能/明确BrS, 459例(65.8%)为可能BrS。在中位57.4个月的随访期间,20名患者(2.9%)经历了主要结局。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,可能BrS的发生率(10年0.11%)明显低于可能/确定BrS的发生率(0.42%)。在可能的BrS组中,SCN5A致病变异是主要终点的重要预测因子(OR: 12.5)。结论:BrS上海评分系统可作为药物致I型BrS心电图患者发生危及生命心律失常的风险分层工具。确定SCN5A突变对于完善风险分层具有关键意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信