Fast and reliable in vitro activity-based detection of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists in e-liquids.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Axelle Timmerman, Cathelijne Lyphout, Nick Verougstraete, Vera Coopman, Christophe Stove
{"title":"Fast and reliable in vitro activity-based detection of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists in e-liquids.","authors":"Axelle Timmerman, Cathelijne Lyphout, Nick Verougstraete, Vera Coopman, Christophe Stove","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-04193-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are marketed as 'legal' cannabis alternatives, but are often much more potent and toxic, increasing the risk of (severe) intoxication. Initially sold as herbal preparations, SCRAs are now increasingly found in e-liquids due to the growing popularity of e-cigarettes. Traditional analytical methods, such as (high-resolution) mass spectrometry, can detect these substances but face limitations regarding time and cost, and require sophisticated equipment and frequently updated mass spectral libraries. Additionally, the continuous emergence of new SCRAs, aiming at evading legislation or detection, further challenges these methods. Activity-based screening, evaluating a sample's inherent cannabinoid activity rather than relying on structural identification, offers an effective alternative. Here, an in vitro CB<sub>1</sub>/β-arrestin2 recruitment assay utilizing the NanoBiT<sup>®</sup> principle was, for the first time, applied to an e-liquid from an intoxicated patient, demonstrating strong cannabinoid activity. Employing the assay to screen a set of 23 e-liquids identified six SCRA positive e-liquids. Moreover, in five e-liquids, a decreased CB<sub>1</sub> activity was observed and experimentally confirmed to be attributable to the presence of the natural cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD). As this could potentially result in a false-negative screening, an adapted protocol was evaluated, incorporating the injection of a CB<sub>1</sub> agonist, CP55,940, while the assay was running. This improved methodology allowed the detection of both SCRAs and CBD in e-liquids. Furthermore, the fast and 'untargeted' nature of this approach makes it a future-proof method for the detection of SCRAs, serving as an effective first-line screening tool, complementing the conventional analytical techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-04193-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are marketed as 'legal' cannabis alternatives, but are often much more potent and toxic, increasing the risk of (severe) intoxication. Initially sold as herbal preparations, SCRAs are now increasingly found in e-liquids due to the growing popularity of e-cigarettes. Traditional analytical methods, such as (high-resolution) mass spectrometry, can detect these substances but face limitations regarding time and cost, and require sophisticated equipment and frequently updated mass spectral libraries. Additionally, the continuous emergence of new SCRAs, aiming at evading legislation or detection, further challenges these methods. Activity-based screening, evaluating a sample's inherent cannabinoid activity rather than relying on structural identification, offers an effective alternative. Here, an in vitro CB1/β-arrestin2 recruitment assay utilizing the NanoBiT® principle was, for the first time, applied to an e-liquid from an intoxicated patient, demonstrating strong cannabinoid activity. Employing the assay to screen a set of 23 e-liquids identified six SCRA positive e-liquids. Moreover, in five e-liquids, a decreased CB1 activity was observed and experimentally confirmed to be attributable to the presence of the natural cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD). As this could potentially result in a false-negative screening, an adapted protocol was evaluated, incorporating the injection of a CB1 agonist, CP55,940, while the assay was running. This improved methodology allowed the detection of both SCRAs and CBD in e-liquids. Furthermore, the fast and 'untargeted' nature of this approach makes it a future-proof method for the detection of SCRAs, serving as an effective first-line screening tool, complementing the conventional analytical techniques.

合成大麻素受体激动剂体外快速、可靠的活性检测方法。
合成大麻素受体激动剂(scra)作为“合法”大麻替代品销售,但往往更强效,毒性更大,增加了(严重)中毒的风险。scra最初作为草药制剂出售,现在由于电子烟的日益普及,scra越来越多地出现在电子液体中。传统的分析方法,如(高分辨率)质谱法,可以检测这些物质,但面临时间和成本的限制,并且需要复杂的设备和经常更新的质谱库。此外,新的scra不断出现,旨在逃避立法或侦查,进一步挑战了这些方法。基于活性的筛选,评估样品的固有大麻素活性,而不是依赖于结构鉴定,提供了一个有效的替代方案。在这里,利用NanoBiT®原理的体外CB1/β-arrestin2招募试验首次应用于中毒患者的电子烟液,显示出强烈的大麻素活性。采用该方法筛选了一组23种电子液体,确定了6种SCRA阳性电子液体。此外,在五种电子液体中,观察到CB1活性降低,并通过实验证实可归因于天然大麻素大麻二酚(CBD)的存在。由于这可能会导致假阴性筛选,因此评估了一种调整后的方案,在检测运行时注射CB1激动剂CP55,940。这种改进的方法允许在电子液体中检测scas和CBD。此外,该方法的快速和“非靶向”特性使其成为一种面向未来的scra检测方法,可作为有效的一线筛选工具,补充传统分析技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信