AI-driven preoperative risk assessment in kidney cancer surgery: A comparative feasibility study of machine learning models

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70080
Julia Mühlbauer, Luise Gottstein, Luisa Egen, Caelan Haney, Alexander Studier-Fischer, Evangelia Christodoulou, Giovanni E. Cacciamani, Keno März, Lena Maier-Hein, Stephan Maurice Michel, Allison Quan, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
{"title":"AI-driven preoperative risk assessment in kidney cancer surgery: A comparative feasibility study of machine learning models","authors":"Julia Mühlbauer,&nbsp;Luise Gottstein,&nbsp;Luisa Egen,&nbsp;Caelan Haney,&nbsp;Alexander Studier-Fischer,&nbsp;Evangelia Christodoulou,&nbsp;Giovanni E. Cacciamani,&nbsp;Keno März,&nbsp;Lena Maier-Hein,&nbsp;Stephan Maurice Michel,&nbsp;Allison Quan,&nbsp;Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Preoperative risk stratification in renal tumour surgery is essential to enable risk-adjusted postoperative patient monitoring. Machine learning (ML) models predicting major complications (MCs) and acute kidney injuries (AKIs) following partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) have not been made, nor have they been compared with traditional logistic regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, setting and participants</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 963 patients who underwent PN and RN between January 2017 and March 2023 at the University Medical Center Mannheim were included. The dataset consisted of 30 variables of interest– 18 descriptive and 12 predictor variables, which allowed for 7 predictor variables per event. The dataset was pre-processed, and ML models were created for MC and AKI. The selected models included Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Stochastic Gradient Boosting, Neural Networks (NNs) and Elastic Net Logistic Regression models (ENETs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and limitations</h3>\n \n <p>For major complications, the NN model had the best model fitting, with an AUROC of 0.762 [95%CI 0.611–0.912], a sensitivity of 0.86 [95%CI 0.80–0.92] and a Brier score of 0.17 [95%CI 0.11–0.23]. For AKI, the best fit model was created using a NN with an AUROC of 0.717 [95%CI 0.611–0.823], a sensitivity of 0.82 [95%CI 0.74–0.90] and a Brier score of 0.24 [95%CI 0.17–0.31]. The best performing models for both outcomes outperformed the ENETs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The ML models provide valuable information for preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing renal tumour surgery. This study suggests that NNs are the most appropriate models to stratify patients regarding the occurrence of MCs and AKIs, respectively. The models are made publicly available for reproducibility.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Preoperative risk stratification in renal tumour surgery is essential to enable risk-adjusted postoperative patient monitoring. Machine learning (ML) models predicting major complications (MCs) and acute kidney injuries (AKIs) following partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) have not been made, nor have they been compared with traditional logistic regression models.

Design, setting and participants

A total of 963 patients who underwent PN and RN between January 2017 and March 2023 at the University Medical Center Mannheim were included. The dataset consisted of 30 variables of interest– 18 descriptive and 12 predictor variables, which allowed for 7 predictor variables per event. The dataset was pre-processed, and ML models were created for MC and AKI. The selected models included Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Stochastic Gradient Boosting, Neural Networks (NNs) and Elastic Net Logistic Regression models (ENETs).

Results and limitations

For major complications, the NN model had the best model fitting, with an AUROC of 0.762 [95%CI 0.611–0.912], a sensitivity of 0.86 [95%CI 0.80–0.92] and a Brier score of 0.17 [95%CI 0.11–0.23]. For AKI, the best fit model was created using a NN with an AUROC of 0.717 [95%CI 0.611–0.823], a sensitivity of 0.82 [95%CI 0.74–0.90] and a Brier score of 0.24 [95%CI 0.17–0.31]. The best performing models for both outcomes outperformed the ENETs.

Conclusions

The ML models provide valuable information for preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing renal tumour surgery. This study suggests that NNs are the most appropriate models to stratify patients regarding the occurrence of MCs and AKIs, respectively. The models are made publicly available for reproducibility.

Abstract Image

人工智能驱动肾癌手术术前风险评估:机器学习模型的比较可行性研究
背景与目的肾肿瘤手术术前风险分层是必要的,使风险调整术后患者监测。机器学习(ML)模型预测部分(PN)或根治性肾切除术(RN)后的主要并发症(MCs)和急性肾损伤(AKIs),也没有与传统的逻辑回归模型进行比较。2017年1月至2023年3月期间在曼海姆大学医学中心接受PN和RN治疗的963名患者被纳入研究。数据集由30个感兴趣的变量组成- 18个描述性变量和12个预测变量,这允许每个事件有7个预测变量。对数据集进行预处理,分别建立MC和AKI的ML模型。选择的模型包括随机森林(RF),支持向量机(svm),随机梯度增强,神经网络(nn)和弹性网络逻辑回归模型(ENETs)。对于主要并发症,NN模型具有最佳的模型拟合,AUROC为0.762 [95%CI 0.611-0.912],敏感性为0.86 [95%CI 0.80-0.92], Brier评分为0.17 [95%CI 0.11-0.23]。对于AKI,使用AUROC为0.717 [95%CI 0.611-0.823],灵敏度为0.82 [95%CI 0.74-0.90], Brier评分为0.24 [95%CI 0.17-0.31]的NN创建最佳拟合模型。两种结果的最佳模型都优于enet。结论ML模型为肾肿瘤手术患者术前风险分层提供了有价值的信息。本研究表明,神经网络是最合适的模型,分别针对MCs和AKIs的发生对患者进行分层。这些模型是公开的,以供再现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信