Beyond Mortality: Advancements in Post-Mortem Iris Recognition Through Data Collection and Computer-Aided Forensic Examination

IF 5
Rasel Ahmed Bhuyian;Parisa Farmanifard;Renu Sharma;Andrey Kuehlkamp;Aidan Boyd;Patrick J. Flynn;Kevin W. Bowyer;Arun Ross;Dennis Chute;Adam Czajka
{"title":"Beyond Mortality: Advancements in Post-Mortem Iris Recognition Through Data Collection and Computer-Aided Forensic Examination","authors":"Rasel Ahmed Bhuyian;Parisa Farmanifard;Renu Sharma;Andrey Kuehlkamp;Aidan Boyd;Patrick J. Flynn;Kevin W. Bowyer;Arun Ross;Dennis Chute;Adam Czajka","doi":"10.1109/TBIOM.2025.3585093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-mortem iris recognition brings both hope to the forensic community (a short-term but accurate and fast means of verifying identity) as well as concerns to society (its potential illicit use in post-mortem impersonation). These hopes and concerns have grown along with the volume of research in post-mortem iris recognition. Barriers to further progress in post-mortem iris recognition include the difficult nature of data collection, and the resulting small number of approaches designed specifically for comparing iris images of deceased subjects. This paper makes several unique contributions to mitigate these barriers. First, we have collected and we offer a new dataset of NIR (compliant with ISO/IEC 19794-6 where possible) and visible-light iris images collected after demise from 259 subjects, with the largest PMI (post-mortem interval) being 1,674 hours. For one subject, the data has been collected before and after death, the first such case ever published. Second, the collected dataset was combined with publicly-available post-mortem samples to assess the current state of the art in automatic forensic iris recognition with five iris recognition methods and data originating from 338 deceased subjects. These experiments include analyses of how selected demographic factors influence recognition performance. Thirdly, this study implements a model for detecting post-mortem iris images, which can be considered as presentation attacks. Finally, we offer an open-source forensic tool integrating three post-mortem iris recognition methods with explainability elements added to make the comparison process more human-interpretable.","PeriodicalId":73307,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science","volume":"7 4","pages":"808-823"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11063436/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-mortem iris recognition brings both hope to the forensic community (a short-term but accurate and fast means of verifying identity) as well as concerns to society (its potential illicit use in post-mortem impersonation). These hopes and concerns have grown along with the volume of research in post-mortem iris recognition. Barriers to further progress in post-mortem iris recognition include the difficult nature of data collection, and the resulting small number of approaches designed specifically for comparing iris images of deceased subjects. This paper makes several unique contributions to mitigate these barriers. First, we have collected and we offer a new dataset of NIR (compliant with ISO/IEC 19794-6 where possible) and visible-light iris images collected after demise from 259 subjects, with the largest PMI (post-mortem interval) being 1,674 hours. For one subject, the data has been collected before and after death, the first such case ever published. Second, the collected dataset was combined with publicly-available post-mortem samples to assess the current state of the art in automatic forensic iris recognition with five iris recognition methods and data originating from 338 deceased subjects. These experiments include analyses of how selected demographic factors influence recognition performance. Thirdly, this study implements a model for detecting post-mortem iris images, which can be considered as presentation attacks. Finally, we offer an open-source forensic tool integrating three post-mortem iris recognition methods with explainability elements added to make the comparison process more human-interpretable.
超越死亡:通过数据收集和计算机辅助法医检查的死后虹膜识别的进展
死后虹膜识别既给法医界带来了希望(一种短期但准确和快速的身份验证方法),也给社会带来了担忧(它可能被非法用于死后冒充)。随着死后虹膜识别研究的增多,这些希望和担忧也随之增加。死亡后虹膜识别进一步发展的障碍包括数据收集的困难性质,以及由此产生的专门用于比较死者虹膜图像的方法较少。本文为减轻这些障碍做出了一些独特的贡献。首先,我们收集并提供了259名受试者死亡后收集的近红外(尽可能符合ISO/IEC 19794-6)和可见光虹膜图像的新数据集,其中最大的PMI(死后间隔)为1,674小时。其中一个研究对象的数据是在他死前和死后收集的,这是首次发表这样的案例。其次,将收集到的数据集与公开的尸体样本相结合,以评估自动法医虹膜识别的现状,包括五种虹膜识别方法和来自338名死者的数据。这些实验包括分析选择的人口因素如何影响识别性能。第三,本研究实现了一个检测死后虹膜图像的模型,可以认为这是一种呈现攻击。最后,我们提供了一个开源取证工具,集成了三种死后虹膜识别方法,并添加了可解释性元素,使比较过程更易于人类解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信