{"title":"The differential effects of emotion regulation strategies on L2 achievement emotions: A structural equation modelling approach","authors":"Deliang Man , Qian Zhou , Li Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the burgeoning interest in emotional well-being, few studies have considered how students strategically manage their emotions in L2 learning. Informed by the ERAS model (Harley et al., 2019), this study surveyed the emotion regulation (ER) strategies deployed by a cohort of L2 learners (<em>N</em> = 403) as they prepared for a high-stakes English proficiency test. The focus is on the differential effects of five types of ER strategies (i.e., situation selection, situation modification, attention redirection, cognitive change, and response modulation) on three achievement emotions (i.e., enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom). The study shows that students tended to rely most on attention redirection and least on cognitive change in their test preparation. However, structural equation modelling showed that situation modification and response modulation were associated with higher levels of positive emotion and lower levels of negative emotions, suggesting they may be the most effective ER strategies in L2 contexts. Attention redirection significantly and positively predicted all three emotions. The other two strategies (situation selection and cognitive change) were suggested to intensify negative emotions and diminish positive emotion. ER strategies explained the largest proportion of variance in enjoyment, followed by anxiety and boredom. This study has implications for emotion regulation interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103854"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the burgeoning interest in emotional well-being, few studies have considered how students strategically manage their emotions in L2 learning. Informed by the ERAS model (Harley et al., 2019), this study surveyed the emotion regulation (ER) strategies deployed by a cohort of L2 learners (N = 403) as they prepared for a high-stakes English proficiency test. The focus is on the differential effects of five types of ER strategies (i.e., situation selection, situation modification, attention redirection, cognitive change, and response modulation) on three achievement emotions (i.e., enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom). The study shows that students tended to rely most on attention redirection and least on cognitive change in their test preparation. However, structural equation modelling showed that situation modification and response modulation were associated with higher levels of positive emotion and lower levels of negative emotions, suggesting they may be the most effective ER strategies in L2 contexts. Attention redirection significantly and positively predicted all three emotions. The other two strategies (situation selection and cognitive change) were suggested to intensify negative emotions and diminish positive emotion. ER strategies explained the largest proportion of variance in enjoyment, followed by anxiety and boredom. This study has implications for emotion regulation interventions.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.