The differential effects of emotion regulation strategies on L2 achievement emotions: A structural equation modelling approach

IF 5.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Deliang Man , Qian Zhou , Li Zhang
{"title":"The differential effects of emotion regulation strategies on L2 achievement emotions: A structural equation modelling approach","authors":"Deliang Man ,&nbsp;Qian Zhou ,&nbsp;Li Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the burgeoning interest in emotional well-being, few studies have considered how students strategically manage their emotions in L2 learning. Informed by the ERAS model (Harley et al., 2019), this study surveyed the emotion regulation (ER) strategies deployed by a cohort of L2 learners (<em>N</em> = 403) as they prepared for a high-stakes English proficiency test. The focus is on the differential effects of five types of ER strategies (i.e., situation selection, situation modification, attention redirection, cognitive change, and response modulation) on three achievement emotions (i.e., enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom). The study shows that students tended to rely most on attention redirection and least on cognitive change in their test preparation. However, structural equation modelling showed that situation modification and response modulation were associated with higher levels of positive emotion and lower levels of negative emotions, suggesting they may be the most effective ER strategies in L2 contexts. Attention redirection significantly and positively predicted all three emotions. The other two strategies (situation selection and cognitive change) were suggested to intensify negative emotions and diminish positive emotion. ER strategies explained the largest proportion of variance in enjoyment, followed by anxiety and boredom. This study has implications for emotion regulation interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103854"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the burgeoning interest in emotional well-being, few studies have considered how students strategically manage their emotions in L2 learning. Informed by the ERAS model (Harley et al., 2019), this study surveyed the emotion regulation (ER) strategies deployed by a cohort of L2 learners (N = 403) as they prepared for a high-stakes English proficiency test. The focus is on the differential effects of five types of ER strategies (i.e., situation selection, situation modification, attention redirection, cognitive change, and response modulation) on three achievement emotions (i.e., enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom). The study shows that students tended to rely most on attention redirection and least on cognitive change in their test preparation. However, structural equation modelling showed that situation modification and response modulation were associated with higher levels of positive emotion and lower levels of negative emotions, suggesting they may be the most effective ER strategies in L2 contexts. Attention redirection significantly and positively predicted all three emotions. The other two strategies (situation selection and cognitive change) were suggested to intensify negative emotions and diminish positive emotion. ER strategies explained the largest proportion of variance in enjoyment, followed by anxiety and boredom. This study has implications for emotion regulation interventions.
情绪调节策略对二语成就情绪的差异影响:结构方程建模方法
尽管人们对情绪健康的兴趣日益浓厚,但很少有研究考虑到学生在第二语言学习中如何策略性地管理他们的情绪。根据ERAS模型(Harley et al., 2019),本研究调查了一组第二语言学习者(N = 403)在准备高风险英语水平测试时采用的情绪调节(ER)策略。研究了情境选择、情境修正、注意力重定向、认知改变和反应调节五种情境策略对三种成就情绪(享受、焦虑和无聊)的差异影响。研究表明,在备考过程中,学生往往最依赖于注意力转移,而最不依赖于认知变化。然而,结构方程模型显示情境修正和反应调节与高水平的积极情绪和低水平的消极情绪相关,表明它们可能是第二语言情境中最有效的ER策略。注意重定向对三种情绪均有显著正向预测。情境选择和认知改变是强化消极情绪和削弱积极情绪的两种策略。ER策略解释了最大比例的享受差异,其次是焦虑和无聊。本研究对情绪调节干预具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信