Xiao-Yan Ding, Hai-Ping Xu, Jing-Ru Zhang, Han Chen
{"title":"Temporal dimensions of oxygen saturation exposure and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-database cohort study","authors":"Xiao-Yan Ding, Hai-Ping Xu, Jing-Ru Zhang, Han Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05652-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies on SpO2 exposure patterns focus solely on SpO2 intensity and neglect exposure duration. We systematically investigated the associations between SpO2 exposure patterns and clinical outcomes from both intensity and temporal dimensions in critically ill patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 121,758 critically ill patients were analyzed. The patient data were obtained from three databases: SICdb (n = 11,324) for continuous exposure analysis using heatmaps, MIMIC-IV (n = 50,110) for cumulative exposure analysis, and eICU (n = 60,324) for validation. We examined the relationships between SpO2 exposure and 28-day mortality using Cox regression and logistic regression models. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed using time-weighted SpO2 as a continuous variable to examine the continuous association between SpO2 values and mortality risk. Both analytical approaches revealed a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and mortality. Heatmap analysis revealed a SpO2 of 93.5–97% as optimal, whereas Cox regression showed that a SpO2 of 96–97% conferred the strongest protection (HR 0.714, 95% CI 0.694–0.733; P < 0.001). Prolonged exposure to SpO2 > 98% had a diminishing effect, whereas SpO2 < 93.5% increased mortality risk (HR 1.236, P < 0.001). External validation confirmed these findings (AUC 0.813). Our study confirms a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and outcomes, emphasizing that oxygenation assessments should consider both intensity and duration. A prolonged SpO2 above 98% or below 94% should be avoided in critically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05652-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most studies on SpO2 exposure patterns focus solely on SpO2 intensity and neglect exposure duration. We systematically investigated the associations between SpO2 exposure patterns and clinical outcomes from both intensity and temporal dimensions in critically ill patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 121,758 critically ill patients were analyzed. The patient data were obtained from three databases: SICdb (n = 11,324) for continuous exposure analysis using heatmaps, MIMIC-IV (n = 50,110) for cumulative exposure analysis, and eICU (n = 60,324) for validation. We examined the relationships between SpO2 exposure and 28-day mortality using Cox regression and logistic regression models. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed using time-weighted SpO2 as a continuous variable to examine the continuous association between SpO2 values and mortality risk. Both analytical approaches revealed a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and mortality. Heatmap analysis revealed a SpO2 of 93.5–97% as optimal, whereas Cox regression showed that a SpO2 of 96–97% conferred the strongest protection (HR 0.714, 95% CI 0.694–0.733; P < 0.001). Prolonged exposure to SpO2 > 98% had a diminishing effect, whereas SpO2 < 93.5% increased mortality risk (HR 1.236, P < 0.001). External validation confirmed these findings (AUC 0.813). Our study confirms a U-shaped relationship between SpO2 and outcomes, emphasizing that oxygenation assessments should consider both intensity and duration. A prolonged SpO2 above 98% or below 94% should be avoided in critically ill patients.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.