{"title":"Improving Constitutive Modelling of Soft Organic Clays With New Experimental Insight","authors":"Ching‐Yu Chao, Stefano Muraro, Cristina Jommi","doi":"10.1002/nag.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The engineering response of soft organic clays is controlled by anisotropy, stress history and the nature of organic matter. The behaviour of these soils has been investigated extensively over compression triaxial paths, and models are available to successfully reproduce available experimental observations. However, open questions remain about the response over stress paths other than compression. In this study, an organic diatomaceous clay from the Netherlands was subjected to an extensive experimental programme, which included monotonic and non‐monotonic axis‐symmetric stress paths in both compression and extension. The comprehensive study introduces a new dataset to support the development and calibration of constitutive approaches. The collected experimental data revealed some limitations in current elastic–plastic models, which were addressed by introducing greater flexibility in the shape of the yield function and enhancing previous rotational hardening rules. The new model, named JMC‐clay, is assessed and validated over a variety of stress paths. The comparison between experimental data and numerical simulations demonstrates the ability of the model to accurately describe the pre‐failure behaviour. The findings emphasise that the model performance is particularly sensitive to elastic–plastic compressibility more than any other parameter. It is suggested that the true bottleneck in the practical implementation of this class of anisotropic formulations is their accurate initialisation, rather than calibration.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The engineering response of soft organic clays is controlled by anisotropy, stress history and the nature of organic matter. The behaviour of these soils has been investigated extensively over compression triaxial paths, and models are available to successfully reproduce available experimental observations. However, open questions remain about the response over stress paths other than compression. In this study, an organic diatomaceous clay from the Netherlands was subjected to an extensive experimental programme, which included monotonic and non‐monotonic axis‐symmetric stress paths in both compression and extension. The comprehensive study introduces a new dataset to support the development and calibration of constitutive approaches. The collected experimental data revealed some limitations in current elastic–plastic models, which were addressed by introducing greater flexibility in the shape of the yield function and enhancing previous rotational hardening rules. The new model, named JMC‐clay, is assessed and validated over a variety of stress paths. The comparison between experimental data and numerical simulations demonstrates the ability of the model to accurately describe the pre‐failure behaviour. The findings emphasise that the model performance is particularly sensitive to elastic–plastic compressibility more than any other parameter. It is suggested that the true bottleneck in the practical implementation of this class of anisotropic formulations is their accurate initialisation, rather than calibration.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.