Improving Constitutive Modelling of Soft Organic Clays With New Experimental Insight

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Ching‐Yu Chao, Stefano Muraro, Cristina Jommi
{"title":"Improving Constitutive Modelling of Soft Organic Clays With New Experimental Insight","authors":"Ching‐Yu Chao, Stefano Muraro, Cristina Jommi","doi":"10.1002/nag.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The engineering response of soft organic clays is controlled by anisotropy, stress history and the nature of organic matter. The behaviour of these soils has been investigated extensively over compression triaxial paths, and models are available to successfully reproduce available experimental observations. However, open questions remain about the response over stress paths other than compression. In this study, an organic diatomaceous clay from the Netherlands was subjected to an extensive experimental programme, which included monotonic and non‐monotonic axis‐symmetric stress paths in both compression and extension. The comprehensive study introduces a new dataset to support the development and calibration of constitutive approaches. The collected experimental data revealed some limitations in current elastic–plastic models, which were addressed by introducing greater flexibility in the shape of the yield function and enhancing previous rotational hardening rules. The new model, named JMC‐clay, is assessed and validated over a variety of stress paths. The comparison between experimental data and numerical simulations demonstrates the ability of the model to accurately describe the pre‐failure behaviour. The findings emphasise that the model performance is particularly sensitive to elastic–plastic compressibility more than any other parameter. It is suggested that the true bottleneck in the practical implementation of this class of anisotropic formulations is their accurate initialisation, rather than calibration.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The engineering response of soft organic clays is controlled by anisotropy, stress history and the nature of organic matter. The behaviour of these soils has been investigated extensively over compression triaxial paths, and models are available to successfully reproduce available experimental observations. However, open questions remain about the response over stress paths other than compression. In this study, an organic diatomaceous clay from the Netherlands was subjected to an extensive experimental programme, which included monotonic and non‐monotonic axis‐symmetric stress paths in both compression and extension. The comprehensive study introduces a new dataset to support the development and calibration of constitutive approaches. The collected experimental data revealed some limitations in current elastic–plastic models, which were addressed by introducing greater flexibility in the shape of the yield function and enhancing previous rotational hardening rules. The new model, named JMC‐clay, is assessed and validated over a variety of stress paths. The comparison between experimental data and numerical simulations demonstrates the ability of the model to accurately describe the pre‐failure behaviour. The findings emphasise that the model performance is particularly sensitive to elastic–plastic compressibility more than any other parameter. It is suggested that the true bottleneck in the practical implementation of this class of anisotropic formulations is their accurate initialisation, rather than calibration.
改进软质有机粘土本构模型的实验新见解
软质有机粘土的工程响应受各向异性、应力历史和有机质性质的控制。这些土壤的行为已经在压缩三轴路径上进行了广泛的研究,并且有模型可以成功地再现现有的实验观察结果。然而,除了压缩之外,对应力路径的响应仍然存在悬而未决的问题。在这项研究中,来自荷兰的有机硅藻质粘土进行了广泛的实验程序,其中包括压缩和拉伸中的单调和非单调轴对称应力路径。这项综合研究引入了一个新的数据集来支持本构方法的开发和校准。收集的实验数据揭示了当前弹塑性模型的一些局限性,通过在屈服函数的形状中引入更大的灵活性和增强先前的旋转硬化规则来解决这些问题。新模型被命名为JMC‐clay,在各种应力路径上进行了评估和验证。实验数据与数值模拟结果的对比表明,该模型能够准确地描述破坏前的行为。研究结果强调,模型性能对弹塑性压缩率的敏感性高于其他任何参数。这表明,在这类各向异性公式的实际实施中,真正的瓶颈是它们的精确初始化,而不是校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信