A Novel Compressive Sensing Approach for Optimizing Automated Monitoring of Excavation‐Induced Horizontal Displacements

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Cheng Chen, Yang Lyv, Liang‐Tong Zhan, Xin‐Jiang Wei, Xing‐Wang Liu, Guan‐Nian Chen
{"title":"A Novel Compressive Sensing Approach for Optimizing Automated Monitoring of Excavation‐Induced Horizontal Displacements","authors":"Cheng Chen, Yang Lyv, Liang‐Tong Zhan, Xin‐Jiang Wei, Xing‐Wang Liu, Guan‐Nian Chen","doi":"10.1002/nag.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As excavation projects become increasingly complex, the demand for automated monitoring systems has risen due to their ability to provide continuous, real‐time data collection. However, traditional methods using automated inclinometers are cost‐prohibitive because they require a high number of sensors for accurate data acquisition. This study proposes a novel approach based on compressive sensing (CS) theory to interpret excavation‐induced horizontal displacement profiles using data from a reduced number of sensors. Validation with 19,311 displacement profiles from a 30.2‐m deep excavation project in Hangzhou, China, demonstrated the robustness of the method, achieving a maximum root mean square error (RMSE) of 6.42 mm (a 7.9% relative error for a maximum displacement of 80.9 mm), while reducing sensor deployment costs by a factor of 22 compared to traditional inclinometer techniques. The CS‐based approach consistently outperformed traditional regression models and proved effective across various sensor spacing scenarios. An analysis of 405,531 simulated cases provided an RMSE envelope, allowing engineers to balance accuracy and budget constraints when selecting sensor spacing. Additionally, comparative studies of sensor placement schemes revealed that while uniform spacing resulted in lower RMSE values and superior overall reconstruction, non‐uniform spacing more effectively captured maximum horizontal displacements, offering a cost‐efficient solution for applications that prioritize critical displacement monitoring.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As excavation projects become increasingly complex, the demand for automated monitoring systems has risen due to their ability to provide continuous, real‐time data collection. However, traditional methods using automated inclinometers are cost‐prohibitive because they require a high number of sensors for accurate data acquisition. This study proposes a novel approach based on compressive sensing (CS) theory to interpret excavation‐induced horizontal displacement profiles using data from a reduced number of sensors. Validation with 19,311 displacement profiles from a 30.2‐m deep excavation project in Hangzhou, China, demonstrated the robustness of the method, achieving a maximum root mean square error (RMSE) of 6.42 mm (a 7.9% relative error for a maximum displacement of 80.9 mm), while reducing sensor deployment costs by a factor of 22 compared to traditional inclinometer techniques. The CS‐based approach consistently outperformed traditional regression models and proved effective across various sensor spacing scenarios. An analysis of 405,531 simulated cases provided an RMSE envelope, allowing engineers to balance accuracy and budget constraints when selecting sensor spacing. Additionally, comparative studies of sensor placement schemes revealed that while uniform spacing resulted in lower RMSE values and superior overall reconstruction, non‐uniform spacing more effectively captured maximum horizontal displacements, offering a cost‐efficient solution for applications that prioritize critical displacement monitoring.
一种新的压缩感知方法用于优化开挖引起的水平位移的自动监测
随着挖掘工程变得越来越复杂,由于能够提供连续、实时的数据收集,对自动化监控系统的需求也在增加。然而,使用自动测斜仪的传统方法成本过高,因为它们需要大量的传感器才能获得准确的数据。本研究提出了一种基于压缩感知(CS)理论的新方法,通过减少传感器数量的数据来解释开挖引起的水平位移剖面。通过对中国杭州30.2 m深开挖项目的19311条位移剖面的验证,证明了该方法的鲁棒性,实现了6.42 mm的最大均方根误差(RMSE)(最大位移为80.9 mm,相对误差为7.9%),同时与传统的倾角仪技术相比,传感器部署成本降低了22倍。基于CS的方法始终优于传统的回归模型,并在各种传感器间距场景中被证明是有效的。对405,531个模拟案例的分析提供了RMSE包络,允许工程师在选择传感器间距时平衡精度和预算限制。此外,对传感器放置方案的比较研究表明,虽然均匀间距导致RMSE值更低,整体重建效果更好,但非均匀间距更有效地捕获最大水平位移,为优先考虑关键位移监测的应用提供了一种经济高效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信