Refining the Classroom: The Self-Supervised Professor Model for Improved Segmentation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Jacqueline I Bereska, Selina Palic, Leonard F Bereska, Efstratios Gavves, C Yung Nio, Marnix P M Kop, Femke Struik, Freek Daams, Martijn A van Dam, Tom Dijkhuis, Marc G Besselink, Henk A Marquering, Jaap Stoker, Inez M Verpalen
{"title":"Refining the Classroom: The Self-Supervised Professor Model for Improved Segmentation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Jacqueline I Bereska, Selina Palic, Leonard F Bereska, Efstratios Gavves, C Yung Nio, Marnix P M Kop, Femke Struik, Freek Daams, Martijn A van Dam, Tom Dijkhuis, Marc G Besselink, Henk A Marquering, Jaap Stoker, Inez M Verpalen","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01555-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with accurate staging being critical for treatment planning. Automated 3D segmentation models can aid in staging, but segmenting PDAC, especially in cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), is challenging due to the tumor's heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration. This study developed and evaluated a tripartite self-supervised learning architecture for improved 3D segmentation of LAPC, addressing the challenges of heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration in PDAC. We implemented a tripartite architecture consisting of a teacher model, a professor model, and a student model. The teacher model, trained on manually segmented CT scans, generated initial pseudo-segmentations. The professor model refined these segmentations, which were then used to train the student model. We utilized 1115 CT scans from 903 patients for training. Three expert abdominal radiologists manually segmented 30 CT scans from 27 patients with LAPC, serving as reference standards. We evaluated the performance using DICE, Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD). The teacher, professor, and student models achieved average DICE scores of 0.60, 0.73, and 0.75, respectively, with significant boundary accuracy improvements (teacher HD95/MSD, 25.71/5.96 mm; professor, 9.68/1.96 mm; student, 4.79/1.34 mm). Our findings demonstrate that the professor model significantly enhances segmentation accuracy for LAPC (p < 0.01). Both the professor and student models offer substantial improvements over previous work. The introduced tripartite self-supervised learning architecture shows promise for improving automated 3D segmentation of LAPC, potentially aiding in more accurate staging and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01555-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with accurate staging being critical for treatment planning. Automated 3D segmentation models can aid in staging, but segmenting PDAC, especially in cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), is challenging due to the tumor's heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration. This study developed and evaluated a tripartite self-supervised learning architecture for improved 3D segmentation of LAPC, addressing the challenges of heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration in PDAC. We implemented a tripartite architecture consisting of a teacher model, a professor model, and a student model. The teacher model, trained on manually segmented CT scans, generated initial pseudo-segmentations. The professor model refined these segmentations, which were then used to train the student model. We utilized 1115 CT scans from 903 patients for training. Three expert abdominal radiologists manually segmented 30 CT scans from 27 patients with LAPC, serving as reference standards. We evaluated the performance using DICE, Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD). The teacher, professor, and student models achieved average DICE scores of 0.60, 0.73, and 0.75, respectively, with significant boundary accuracy improvements (teacher HD95/MSD, 25.71/5.96 mm; professor, 9.68/1.96 mm; student, 4.79/1.34 mm). Our findings demonstrate that the professor model significantly enhances segmentation accuracy for LAPC (p < 0.01). Both the professor and student models offer substantial improvements over previous work. The introduced tripartite self-supervised learning architecture shows promise for improving automated 3D segmentation of LAPC, potentially aiding in more accurate staging and treatment planning.

改进课堂:自我监督的教授模型用于局部晚期胰腺导管腺癌的改进分割。
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,准确的分期对治疗计划至关重要。自动3D分割模型可以帮助分期,但PDAC的分割,特别是局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC),由于肿瘤的异质外观,不规则形状和广泛浸润,具有挑战性。本研究开发并评估了一种三方自监督学习架构,用于改进LAPC的3D分割,解决了PDAC中异质外观、不规则形状和广泛浸润的挑战。我们实现了一个由教师模型、教授模型和学生模型组成的三方体系结构。教师模型在人工分割的CT扫描上训练,生成初始的伪分割。教授模型对这些分割进行了细化,然后用来训练学生模型。我们使用来自903名患者的1115个CT扫描进行训练。三名腹部放射科专家手工分割了27例LAPC患者的30张CT扫描图,作为参考标准。我们使用DICE、Hausdorff距离(HD95)和平均表面距离(MSD)来评估性能。教师、教授和学生模型的平均DICE得分分别为0.60、0.73和0.75,边界精度显著提高(教师HD95/MSD为25.71/5.96 mm;教授HD95/MSD为9.68/1.96 mm;学生HD95/ 1.34 mm)。结果表明,教授模型显著提高了LAPC的分割精度(p < 0.01)。教授和学生模型都比以前的工作有了实质性的改进。引入的三方自我监督学习架构有望改善LAPC的自动3D分割,可能有助于更准确的分期和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信